Abstract
This paper is concerned with multidisciplinary practice (MDP) in the emerging field of requirements engineering (RE). It is argued that multidisciplinary requirements engineering practice is ineffective. MDP in RE is introduced, exemplified, and problems identified. The incommensurability of conflicting paradigms may be a possible underlying cause of such problems. Accommodation of alternative paradigms is discussed, and criteria for support to overcome the problems of MDP are proposed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austin, A. E. (1990), Discussion on Accommodation, in E. G. Guba (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog, Sage Publications.
Burrel, G. & Morgan, G. (1979), Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, Heinemann.
Checkland, P. B. (1981), Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley&Sons.
Chua, W. (1986), “Radical Developments in Accounting Thought”, Accounting Review 61(4), 601–632.
Crandall, D. (1990), Peering at Paradigms through the Prism of Practice Improvement, in E. G. Guba (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog, Sage Publications.
Denley, I. (1999), Dialectic Approach to Multidisciplinary Practice in Requirements Engineering, PhD thesis, University College London, London, UK.
Firestone, W. (1990), Accommodation: Towards a Paradigm-Praxis Dialectic, in E. G. Guba (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog, Sage Publications, pp. 105–24.
Gasson, S. (1995), User Involvement in Decision Making in Information Systems Development, in B. Dahlbom, F. Kämmerer, F. Ljundberg, J. Stage & C. Sørensen (eds.), Proceedings of IRIS 18, Gothenberg Studies in Informatics, Report 7. http://iris.informatik.gu.se/conference/iris18/iris1826.html.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989), Fourth Generation Evaluation, Sage Publications.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994), Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research, in N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), The Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, chapter 6, pp. 105–17.
Hughes, J., Randall, D. & Shapiro, D. (1993), “From Ethnographic Records to System Design: Some Experiences from the Field”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1(3), 123–41.
Jackson, N. & Carter, P. (1991), “In Defence of Paradigm Incommensurability”, Organization Studies 12, 109–27.
Kitchener, R. (1986), Piaget’s Theory of Knowledge, Yale University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolution, University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolution, second edition, University of Chicago Press.
LeCompte, M. D. (1990), Emergent Paradigms: How New? How Necessary, in E. G. Guba (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog, Sage Publications, pp. 167–87.
Lincoln, Y. (1990), The Making of a Constructivist, in E. G. Guba (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog, Sage Publications, pp.67–87.
Long, J. & Dowell, J. (1989), Conceptions of the Discipline of HCI: Craft, Applied Science and Engineering, in A. Sutcliffe & L. Macaulay (eds.), People and Computers V (Proceedings of HCI’89), Cambridge University Press, pp.9–34.
Macaulay, L. A. (1996), Requirements Engineering, Springer-Verlag.
Reinharz, S. (1981), Implementing New Paradigm Research: A Model for Training and Practice, in P. Reason & J. Rowan (eds.), Human Inquiry: A Sourcebook of New Paradigm Research, John Wiley&Sons, pp.415–36.
Sankey, H. (1994), The Incommensurability Thesis, Avebury.
Scaife, M., Curtis, E. & Hill, C. (1994), “Interdisciplinary Collaboration: A Case Study of Software Development for Fashion Designers”, Interacting with Computers 6(4), 395–410.
Schon, D. A. (1983), The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals think in Action, Basic Books.
Skrtic, T. M. (1990), Social Accommodation: Towards a Dialogical Discourse in Educational Inquiry, in E. G. Guba (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog, Sage Publications, pp. 125–35.
Sommerville, I., Rodden, T., Sawyer, P., Bentley, R. & Twidale, M. (1993), Integrating Ethonography into the Requirements Engineering Process, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE’93), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 165–173.
Sommerville, I., Sawyer, P. & Viller, S. (1998), Viewpoints for Requirements Elicitation: A Practical Approach, in Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE’98), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp.74–81.
Stamper, R. (1994), Social Norms in Requirements Analysis—An Outline of MEASUR, in M. Jirotka & J. Goguen (eds.), Requirements Engineering: Social and Technical Issues, Academic Press.
Sutcliffe, A. G. (1997), A Technique Combination Approach to Requirements Engineering, in J. Mylopoulos (ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE’97), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp.65–74.
Weaver, G. & Gioia, D. (1995), “Paradigms Lost: Incommensurability vs. Structurationist Inquiry”, Organization Studies 15(4), 565–589.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag London
About this paper
Cite this paper
Denley, I., Long, J. (2001). Multidisciplinary Practice in Requirements Engineering: Problems and Criteria for Support. In: Blandford, A., Vanderdonckt, J., Gray, P. (eds) People and Computers XV—Interaction without Frontiers. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0353-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0353-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-515-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0353-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive