The Nile Basin is characterised by a number of asymmetries. First, the water endowments and use are asymmetrical. The eight upstream riparians provide all the surface water in the basin but they make negligible use of these surface waters. Downstream Egypt and the Sudan are arid but benefit from a notional total use of the flowing surface waters. A second asymmetry is that the upstream riparians are also well endowed with soil water. Soil water cannot be shared except in traded commodities and these non-shareable soil waters are probably twice the volume of the technically shareable surface waters. The third asymmetry is in adaptive capacity.
Egypt has adapted to its serious water deficits since the early 1970s by achieving water security by diversifying and strengthening its economy. Its diversified economy has enabled it to import food and embedded virtual water. The upstream riparians have achieved much lower levels of adaptive capacity. The fourth and most important asymmetry is a consequence of Egypt's adaptive capacity. There is a marked asymmetry in power relations in the Nile Basin. Egypt is the basin hegemon. A hegemon is a first amongst assumed equals. Its interests have been asserted in basin hydropolitics and are expressed in de facto allocations and in the existing Nile Water Agreements — 1929 and 1959 — between Egypt and the Sudan. Its interests continue to be influential across the basin in the initiatives that emerged in the 1990s as an organisation established in 1999 — The Nile Basin Initiative.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Allan, J. A., 2001. The Middle East Water Question: hydropolitics and the global economy. London, I. B. Tauris.
Burke, J. & P. Steduto, 2007. Personal communication of senior professional staff of FAO.
Cascao, A., 2008a. Ethiopia: challenges to Egyptian hegemony in the Nile Basin, Water Policy — Special Issue on Power and Hydropolitics: Hydro-Hegemony [forthcoming].
Cascao, A., 2008b. From conflict to cooperation in the Nile River Basin — The complex political dynamics in the management of international water resources, Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, University of London, King's College.
Chapagain, A. K., 2006. Globalisation of Water: Opportunities and Threats of Virtual Water Trade. UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education. Ph. D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands.
Chapagain, A. K. & A. Y. Hoekstra, 2004a. Water Footprints of Nations, Volume 1: Main Report. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 16. Delft, Netherlands: UNESCO-IHE Delft.
Chapagain, A. K. & A.Y. Hoekstra, 2004b. Water Footprints of Nations, Volume 2: Appendices. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 16. Delft, Netherlands: UNESCO-IHE Delft.
Conway, D., A. Persechino & S. Ardoin, 2007. Water Resources in Sub-Saharan Africa: Understanding and Managing Variability, Norwich, UEA.
de Fraiture, C., X. Cai, U. Amarasinghe, M. Rosengrant & D. Molden, 2007. Does International Cereal Trade Save Water? The Impact of Virtual Water Trade on Global Water Use. Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute.
Dorosh, P., H.-G. Wang & L. You, 2008. Crop production and road connectivity in Sub-Saharan Africa: preliminary findings of a spatial analysis, Unpublished paper, World Bank, Washington.
FAO, 2006a. Estimates of green and blue water in the Nile Basin riparians, Unpublished dataset prepared by the FAO Soil and Water Divison.
FAO, 2006b. World Agriculture: Towards 2030/2050 — Prospects for food, nutrition, agriculture and major commodity groups. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, June 2006.
FAO, 2008. Database with estimates of blue and green water in the Nile Basin, FAO Land and Water Division. Rome, FAO.
Greco, F., 2003. The Disi water system in Jordan: old water policies will cause heavy environmental effects, Afriche Orienti, Dossier Water: Economics and Politics, Vols. 3–4.
ILA — International Law Association, 1966. The Helsinki Rules on the non-navigational uses of international water courses. London, International Law Association.
ILC — International Law Commission of the United Nations, 1997. The International Convention on the non-navigational uses international water courses. New York, UN International Law Commission.
Jacob, W., J. W. Kijne, R. Barker & D. Molden, 2004. Water productivity in agriculture: limits and opportunities for improvement (Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture Series, 1), IWMI in Colombo, Wakkingford, CABI.
Jägerskog, A., J. Granit, A. Risberg & W. Yu, 2007. Transboundary Water Management as a Regional Public Good. Financing Development — An Example from the Nile Basin. Report Nr. 20. Stockholm, SIWI.
Lasswell, H., 1956. Who gets what, when and how, First published in 1935.
London Water Research Group for FAO, 2007. Virtual water ‘flows’ of the Nile Basin — evaluating current and future crop and livestock trade between Nile riparians and globally: a first approximation. London, King's College.
Lukes, S., 1974. Power: a radical view, republished 2005, Cambridge, Palgrave.
Milly, P. C. D., K. A. Dunne & A. V. Vecchia, 2005. Global pattern of trends on streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature 438: 347–350.
Mohieldeen, Y., 2008. Sudan's Nile waters and the Eastern Nile Basin: hydropolitics in a politicized environment. Ph. D. Thesis, University of London SOAS.
Molden, D., 2007. Water for Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture, London, Earthscan.
Phillips, D., M. Daoudy, J. Öjendal, A. Turton & S. McCaffrey, 2006. Trans-boundary Water Cooperation as a Tool for Conflict Prevention and Broader Benefit-sharing. Stockholm, Sweden, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Stoner, D., 1995. Future irrigation planning in Egypt. In P. P. Howell & J. A. Allan, The Nile: sharing a scarce resource. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp 281–298.
Tiffen, M. & M. Mortimore, 1994. Environment, Population Growth and Productivity in Kenya: A Case Study of Machakos District. Issue Paper 47. Drylands Network Programme. London, UK, International Institute for Environment and Development.
Warner, J., 2008. The Politics of Flood Insecurity: Framing Contested River Management Projects. Wageningen University.
Waterbury, J., 1989. The Hydropolitics of the Nile. Syracuse University Press.
Waterbury, J., 2002. The Nile: National Determinants of Collective Action. Newhaven, Yale University Press.
World Bank, 2006. Egypt: West Delta Project irrigation infrastructure development, Project Information Document, Washington, World Bank.
Zeitoun, M., 2008. Power and Water in the Middle East: The Hidden Politics of the Palestinian-Israeli Water Conflict. London, I. B. Tauris.
Zeitoun, M. & J. A. Allan, 2007. Virtual water ‘flows’ of the Nile Basin: evaluating current and future crop and livestock trade between Nile riparians and globally — A first approximation, Working Paper, Prepared by the London Water Research Group June 2007 for the FAO Land and Water Division of FAO. Rome, FAO.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Allan, J.A. (2009). Nile Basin Asymmetries: A Closed Fresh Water Resource, Soil Water Potential, the Political Economy and Nile Transboundary Hydropolitics. In: Dumont, H.J. (eds) The Nile. Monographiae Biologicae, vol 89. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9726-3_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9726-3_35
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9725-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9726-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)