Not only is formal education a determinant of an individual's opportunities in the future, but basic education is also a human right. Education is an important requisite for the accumulation of “human capabilities” which are necessary for the individual to reflect, make choices, and participate and live a better life in society (Sen 1999). Given the overriding importance of education and particularly basic education, no country is opposed to the idea of Education for All (EFA). The challenge is how to reach the stage where everyone has achieved at least a quality basic education necessary for their function in society. Many countries that have endorsed the EFA as their education goals have introduced many education reforms to improve both access to, and quality of, education. This chapter seeks to illustrate the challenge in achieving equity and quality of basic education using Cambodia as a case study. It reveals that to achieve equity and quality of education, mere resource provision is not sufficient. Achieving equity and quality is a challenging task that requires a careful and well-coordinated policy design and implementation at all levels of education administration. It requires political will on the part of the central government, and the capacity to innovate and implement progressive policy at the local levels.
The chapter begins with a discussion on what has dominated thinking in education development. It then proceeds to illustrate the case of Cambodia by first reviewing the policy objectives and agenda which have been put forward for implementation with a great sense of optimism. Next, it highlights the impact of the policy reform on the primary education sector, revealing that while the reform was successful at improving enrollment rates in some provinces, it generally was not successful at raising the quality of primary education. The chapter then closely examines why quality of education is difficult to achieve by this large-scale reform. It ends with the conclusions and some policy recommendations for policy-makers to consider when designing and implementing education reform.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Arnove R. (1997). “Neo-liberal Education Policies in Latin America: Arguments in Favor and Against,” in Torres, C.A. and A. Puiggrós (eds.), Latin American Education: Comparative Perspectives. United States: Westview Press, pp. 79–100.
Bray, M. (1999) “The Private Costs of Public Schooling: Household and Community Financing of Primary Education in Cambodia.” Paris: UNESCO/International Institute for Education and Planning (IIEP).
Bray, M. and Seng B. (2005). Balancing the Books: Household Financing of Basic Education in Cambodia. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Center, The University of Hong Kong.
Bray, M., Xiaohao, D. and Ping, H. (2004). Reducing the Burden on the Poor: Household Costs of Basic Education in Gansu, China. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong Press.
Buchmann, C. (1996). “The Debt Crisis, Structural Adjustment and Women's Education: Implications for Status and Social Development.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 37: 5–30.
Colclough, C. and Al-Samarrai, S. (2000). “Achieving Schooling for All: Budgetary Expenditures on Education.” World Development, 28(11): 1927–1944.
Cuellar-Marchelli, H. (2003). “Decentralization and Privatization of Education in El Salvador:Assessing the Experience.” International Journal of Educational Development, 23: 145–166.
Dyer, C. (1999). “Researching the Implementation of Educational Policy: A Backward Mapping Approach.” Comparative Education, 35: 45–61.
EMIS (1996/97). Education Statistics and Indicators. Phnom Penh: EMIS/MoEYS.
EMIS (1997/98). Education Statistics and Indicators. Phnom Penh: EMIS/MoEYS.
EMIS (1998/99). Education Statistics and Indicators. Phnom Penh: EMIS/MoEYS.
EMIS (1999/00). Education Statistics and Indicators. Phnom Penh: EMIS/MoEYS.
EMIS (2000/01). Education Statistics and Indicators. Phnom Penh: EMIS/MoEYS.
EMIS (2001/02). Education Statistics and Indicators. Phnom Penh: EMIS/MoEYS.
EMIS (2002/03). Education Statistics and Indicators. Phnom Penh: EMIS/MoEYS.
EMIS (2003/04). Education Statistics and Indicators. Phnom Penh: EMIS/MoEYS.
EMIS (2004/05). Education Statistics and Indicators. Phnom Penh: EMIS/MoEYS.
EMIS (2005/06). Education Statistics and Iindicators. Phnom Penh: EMIS/MoEYS.
EMIS (2006/07). Education Statistics and Indicators. Phnom Penh: EMIS/MoEYS.
Elmore, R. (1980). “Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions.” Political Science Quarterly, 94: 601–616.
Frances, V. (2002). “Making Distinctions: Privatization and the (Un)educated Girl on Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania.” International Journal of Educational Development, 22(5): 527–47.
Frances, V. (2005). “Adjusting Inequality: Education and Structural Adjustment Policies in Tanzania.” Harvard Educational Review, 75(2): 174–201.
Grindle, M (2004). Despite the Odds: The Contentious Politics of Education Reform. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Grindle, M. and Thomas, J. (1991). Public Choices and Policy Change: The Political Economy of Reform in Developing Countries. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Haddad, W. D. (1990). “Education for All: the Role of International Aid.” Prospect, 20(4): 525–536.
Kitamura, Y. (2005). “Financing Basic Education in Developing Countries: An Analysis of International Commitments to the EFA Fast-Track Initiative.” GSID Discussion Paper No.130,
retrieved May 15, 2007. http://www.gsid.nagoya-u.ac.jp/bpub/research/public/paper/arti- cle/130.pdf
London, N. A. (1993). “Why Education Projects in Developing Countries fail? A Case Study.” International Journal of Educational Development, 13: 265–275.
McGinn, N.and Welch, T. (1999). Decentralization of Education: Why, When, What and How? Paris: UNESCO/IIEP.
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (MoEYS) (2001a). Education Strategic Plan 2001–2005. Phnom Penh: MoEYS.
MoEYS (2001b). Education Sector Support Program (ESSP) 2001–2005. Phnom Penh: MoEYS.
MoEYS (2002a). Education Sector Support Program (ESSP) 2002–2006. Phnom Penh: MoEYS.
MoEYS (2002b). Cambodia Education Sector Donor Report. Presented for the 2002 ESSP joint review. Phnom Penh: MoEYS.
MoEYS (2006). Student Achievement and Education Policy: Result from the Grade Three Assessment. Phnom Penh: MoEYS.
Napier, B. D. (2005). “Implementing Education Transformation Policies: Investigating Issues of Ideal Versus Real in Developing Countries,” in Baker P. D. and Wiseman W. A. (eds.), Global Trend in Education Policy. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 1–22.
Nieuwenhuis, F. J. (1997). “Can Research into the Development of Education in Post-Colonial Africa Shape Education Policies in South Africa?” International Journal of Educational Development, 17(2): 129–144.
Psacharopoulos, G. (1989). “Why Educational Reforms Fail: A Comparative Analysis.” International Review of Education, 35: 179–195.
Pellini, A. (2005). “Decentralisation of Education in Cambodia: Searching for Spaces of Participation between Traditions and Modernity.” Compare, 35(2): 205–216.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
UNESCO (1990). World Declaration on Education for All: Meeting the Basic Learning Needs. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO (1998). Education for all: The Year 2000 Assessment: Technical Guidelines. Paris: MoEYS.
UNESCO (2000). The Dakar Framework for Action —Education for All: Meeting Our Collective Commitments. Paris: UNESCO.
Verspoor, A. M. (1992). “Planning of Education: Where Do We Go?” International Journal of Educational Development, 12: 233–244.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chansopheak, K. (2009). Basic Education in Cambodia: Quality and Equity. In: Hirosato, Y., Kitamura, Y. (eds) The Political Economy of Educational Reforms and Capacity Development in Southeast Asia. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9377-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9377-7_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9375-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9377-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)