Anglo-American epistemology has long recognized its debt to Pierre Duhem: most notably in the so-called “Duhem–Quine” thesis that has been at the center of debates over empiricism and realism. These debates began with the Vienna Circle and have continued through the development of a more historical reflection on the sciences. This development is still ongoing, as can be seen in Hilary Putnam’s work on realism. The most prominent figures in this movement of inheritance of Duhem’s work, as well as the most controversial, are Kuhn and Feyerabend. But this change in American philosophy of science since, say, the sixties may also draw our attention to another influence, less visible than Duhem’s, but just as important: that of Emile Meyerson. One finds references to Meyerson in writings by both Quine and Kuhn. Kuhn, in particular, has explicitly recognized his debt to the author of Identity and Reality. In an interview in the French newspaper Le Monde, 1 he noted that he had, in philosophy, three major influences, apart from his contemporary, Quine: Duhem (for his Aim and Structure of Physical Theory), Meyerson (for Identity and Reality), and Koyré, who was responsible for the direct transmission of Meyerson’s work to the U.S. Kuhn also recalled that it was Popper himself who advised him to read Identity and Reality, a work that proved decisive for Kuhn.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Bibliography
Bitbol, Michel et Gayon, Jean (2006), L’Épistémologie française, 1830–1970, Paris, PUF. 2006.
Brenner, Anastasios (1990), Duhem : science, réalité et apparence. La relation entre philosophie et histoire dans l’oeuvre de Pierre Duhem, Paris, Vrin, »Mathesis«.
Brenner, Anastasios (2003), les origines françaises de la philosophie des sciences, Paris, PUF.
Carnap Rudolf (1934), Logische Syntax der Sprache; The Logical Syntax of Language, transl. Amethe Smeaton, London, Kegan Paul, 1937.
Duhem Pierre (1903), L’Évolution de la mécanique, Paris, Vrin, 1992; The Evolution of Mechanics, transl. M. Cole, Alphen aan den Rijn, Sijthoff and Noordhoff, 1980.
Duhem Pierre (1906), La Théorie physique, son objet et sa structure, Paris, Vrin, 1981; The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, transl. P. Wiener, Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press, 1962.
Duhem Pierre (1905–1906), Les origines de la statique, 2 vol., Paris, Hermann. The Origins of Statics, transl. G.F. Leneaux et al., Kluwer, 1981.
Duhem Pierre (1908), Sauver les phénomènes. Essai sur la notion de théorie physique de Platon à Galilée, Paris Vrin, 1982. To Save the Phenomena, transl. E. Doland and C. Maschler, Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1969.
Duhem Pierre (1913–1959), Le système du monde. Histoire des doctrines cosmologiques de Platon à Copernic, 10 vol., Paris, Hermann; Medieval Cosmology, partial transl. Roger. Ariew, Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1985.
Duhem Pierre (1915), La science allemande, Paris, Hermann; German Science, transl. J. Lyon, La Salle, Open Court, 1991.
Duhem Pierre (1997), L’aube du savoir: épitomé du Système du monde, A. Brenner, (ed.), Paris, Hermann.
Einstein Albert (1987), Collected Papers, vol. 2, Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press.
Fine Arthur (1986), The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism, and the Quantum Theory, 2nd ed., Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1996.
Hacking Ian (1983), Representing and Intervening, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Holton Gerald (1968), “Mach, Einstein and the Search for Reality”, Daedalus, 97, pp. 637–673.
Koyré Alexandre (1931), “Die Philosophie Emile Meyerson”, Deutsch-Franzôsische Rundschau, 4, pp. 197–217.
Koyré Alexandre (1926), “Compte rendu de La Scolastique et le thomisme” par L. Rougier, Gauthier Villars, 1925, Revue philosophique, 1926, pp. 462–468.
Kuhn Thomas (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn Thomas (1977), The Essential Tension, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn Thomas (2000), The Road since Structure, James Conant and John Haugeland (eds.), Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos Imre (1995), “The methodology of scientific research programmes”, Philosophical papers, volume I, edited by John Worrall and Gregory Currie, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos Imre, Alan Musgrave (eds.), (1970), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Laugier Sandra (1992), L’anthropologie logique de Quine, Paris, Vrin.
Laugier Sandra (2003) (ed.), “Après la Structure – Kuhn, les révolutions scientifiques et l’incommensurabilité”, Archives de Philosophie.
Lévy-Bruhl Lucien (1949), Les Carnets, Paris, Presses universitaires de France; The Notebooks on Primitive Mentality, transl. Peter Rivière, New York, Harper and Row, 1975.
Quine Willard Van Orman (1960), Word and Object, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.
Quine Willard Van Orman (1961), From a Logical Point of View, 2nd ed., Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.
Quine Willard Van Orman (1969), Ontological Relativity, New York, Columbia University Press.
Quine Willard Van Orman (1981), Theories and Things, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.
Quine Willard Van Orman (1982), Methods of Logic, 4th ed., Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.
Quine Willard Van Orman (1995), “Naturalism; Or, Living Within One’s Means”, Dialectica 49/2, 251–261.
Metzger Hélène (1930), “La philosophie de Lévy-Bruhl et l’histoire des sciences”, Archeion, 12, pp. 15–24.
Meyerson Émile (1908), Identité et réalité, Paris, Vrin, 1951; Identity and Reality, London, George Allen and Unwin, 1930.
Meyerson Émile (1921), De l’explication dans les sciences, 2 vols, Paris, Payot; transl. Explanation in the Sciences, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1991.
Meyerson Émile (1923), “Hegel, Hamilton, Hamelin et le concept de cause”, Revue philosophique, 96, pp. 33–55.
Meyerson Émile (1925), La Déduction relativiste, Paris, Payot; transl. The Relativist Deduction: Epistemologival Implications of the Theory of Relattivity, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1985.
Meyerson Émile (1931), Le Cheminement de la pensée, Paris, Alcan.
Meyerson Émile (1933), Réel et déterminisme dans la physique quantique, Paris, Hermann, “Actualités scientifiques et industrielles”.
Rougier Louis (1925), La Scolastique et le thomisme, Paris, Gautier Villars.
Schlick Moritz (1979), Philosophical Papers, Henk L. Mulder and Barbara F.B. Van de Velde- Schlick (eds.), transl. Peter Heath, 2 vol., Dordrecht, Reidel.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laugier, S. (2009). Science and Realism: The Legacy of Duhem and Meyerson in Contemporary American Philosophy of Science. In: Brenner, A., Gayon, J. (eds) French Studies In The Philosophy Of Science. Boston Studies In The Philosophy Of Science, vol 276. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9368-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9368-5_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9367-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9368-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)