Abstract
The events of 9/11 have dramatically shifted public and private sector priorities aimed at addressing the threat of transnational terrorism. An important issue facing public decision makers is how best to allocate scarce resources in the face of significant uncertainty concerning potential threats and hazards, together with uncertainty concerning the potential costs and benefits associated with possible prevention and mitigation strategies. Viewing this problem from the vantage point of modern economic theory, normative theories of choice provide guidance on how agents should make decisions if they wish to act in accordance with certain logical principles. Often, however, there is a discord between normative theory and how people behave in real-world decision contexts. In this paper we explore several aspects of current homeland security resource allocation practices within the federal government. We begin with an examination of two normative investment models, and we explore the linkages that exist between actual practice and the insights that economic theory lends to these problems. We then present the rudiments of a prescriptive approach to homeland security decision making and risk management that seeks to guide decision makers toward consistent, rational choices, while recognizing their real-world limitations and constraints.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, 1983. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Chalk, P., Hoffman, B., Reville, R., and Kasupski, A., 2005. Trends in Terrorism: Threats to the United States and the Future of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Ervin, C. K., 2006. Open Target: Where America Is Vulnerable to Attack. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Farrow, S., 2007. The economics of homeland security expenditures: foundational expected cost-effectiveness approaches. Contemporary Economic Policy 25(1):14–26 (January 2007).
Haimes, Y., 2004. Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management. Wiley, Hoboken, NX 53
Keeney, R., and Raiffa, H., 1993. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Keeney, R. L., 1992. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision-Making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Machina, M. J., 1987. Choice under uncertainty: problems solved and unsolved. Economic Perspectives 1(1):121–154.
Morgan, M. G., and Henrion, M., 1990. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Moteff, J., 2004. Risk management and critical infrastructure protection: Assessing, integrating, and managing threats, vulnerabilities, and consequences. Tech. Rep. RL32561, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC.
Posner, R. A., 2005. Preventing Surprise Attacks: Intelligence Reform in the Wake of 9/11. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
Raiffa, H., 1968. Decision Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
United States Government Accountability Office (GAO), 2001. Key Elements of a Risk Management Approach. No. GAO-02-150T. Washington, DC.
United States GAO, 2004. Combating Terrorism: Evaluation of Selected Characteristics in National Strategies Related to Terrorism. No. GAO-04-408T. Washington, DC.
United States GAO, 2005. Risk Management: Further Refinements Needed to Assess Risks and Prioritize Protective Measures at Ports and Other Critical Infrastructure. No. GAO-0691. Washington, DC.
Viscusi, W. K., 1998. Rational Risk Policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this paper
Cite this paper
Valverde, L., Farrow, S. (2008). Federal Decision Making for Homeland Security. In: Linkov, I., Ferguson, E., Magar, V.S. (eds) Real-Time and Deliberative Decision Making. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9026-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9026-4_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9025-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9026-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)