Abstract
Since the 1980s, a large body of analysis in communication and political science has emphasized the importance of activating spaces for public discussion, not only on political issues but also on themes of strong public impact, such as the effects of techno-scientific innovations. Challenge for political transformation is crucial for the concurrent changeover from representation to deliberation in the realm of techno-scientific innovation. In the traditional decision-making processes of representative democracy, all the points of view and interests of civil society are not necessarily—indeed, almost never—represented and considered. This means that representation is always partial, and the arguments of those who will be affected by particular innovations are not part of the debate serving to orient decisions. By contrast, the deliberative model of democracy is founded upon public discussion and the exchange of arguments. Representative and deliberative democracy are strictly interdependent, and it is misleading to consider the two terms as being in opposition to each other. Rather, considering them as terms in the same equation is much more conducive to effective management of the relationship between techno-science and society.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bobbio, L. (2002). Le arene deliberative. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 3, 5–29.
Bush, V. (1945). Science, the endless frontier. A report to the President by Vannevar Bush, Director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm.
Cohen, J. (1997). Deliberative democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive democracy. Politics, policy, and political science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Einsiedel, E. & Eastlick, D. L. (2000). Consensus conferences as deliberative democracy. A communications perspective. Science Communication, 4, 323–343.
Elster, J. (1998). Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ezrahi, Y. (1990). The descent of Icarus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Frankenfeld, P. J. (1990). Technological citizenship: A normative framework for risk studies. Science, Technology and Human Values, 15, 226–243.
Geuna, M. (1998). La tradizione repubblicana e i suoi interpreti. Filosofia politica, 1, 101–132.
Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. London: Profile.
Habermas, J. (1998). The inclusion of the other. Studies in political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the global order. From the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Stanford: Polity Press and Stanford University Press.
Kelsen, H. (1966). General theory of law and state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Longo, G. O. (2001). Homo technologicus. Rome: Meltemi.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Science and democratic social structure. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press, 604–615.
Polanyi, M. (1962). The republic of science. Minerva, I, 54–73.
Radaelli, C. M. (1999). Idee e conoscenza nelle politiche pubbliche europee: tecnocrazia o politicizzazione? Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 3, 517–546.
Rowe, G. & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology and Human Values, 30, 251–290.
Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Further Reading
Abramson, J. B., Arterton, F. C. & Orren, G. R. (Eds.) (1988). The electronic commonwealth. The impact of new technologies on democratic politics. New York: Basic Books.
Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy. Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bennett, W. L., Entman, R. M. (Eds.) (2001). Mediated politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bucchi, M. (2006). Scegliere il mondo che volgiamo. Cittadini, politica, tecnoscienza. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Crane, D. (1995). Reconceptualizing the public sphere: The electronic media and the public. Paper presented at the annual Joint Congress of Swiss Societies for the Social Sciences, Berne.
Grandi, R. (2001). La comunicazione pubblica. Milan: Carocci.
Grossman, L. (1995). The electronic republic. New York: Penguin Books.
Pellegrini, G. (2005). Biotecnologie e Cittadinanza. Padova: Gregoriana Editrice.
Schneider, S. (2000). Political portals and democracy. Threats and promises. iMP on-line. Retrieved on 20 October 2007 from http://www.cisp.org/imp/may_2000/05_00schider.htm.
Thompson, J. B. (1995). The media and modernity. A social theory of the media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Toffler, A. (1995). Creating a new civilization. The politics of the third wave. Atlanta: Turner Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pellegrini, G. (2008). Representation and Deliberation: New Perspectives on Communication Among Actors in Science and Technology Innovation. In: Cheng, D., Claessens, M., Gascoigne, T., Metcalfe, J., Schiele, B., Shi, S. (eds) Communicating Science in Social Contexts. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8598-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8598-7_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8597-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8598-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)