This article introduces the concept of multiple stressors. It has been written for the layperson, in terms that do not require a strong scientific background. It has been written to facilitate scientists’ communication with the public and funding agencies about multiple stressors. This article briefly explains several major classes of contaminants whose global dispersal and long-term persistence in the environment might cause them to contribute to multiple stressors. Highlighted is our lack of understanding about the potential interactions among multiple stressors and the need for much additional research. Interactions are explained through a simple example of various plausible responses that an organism might exhibit when exposed to both cadmium and radiation. Our current approach for determining human and ecological risks from contaminants is explained such that the reader is aware of why multiple stressor research is needed. This article stresses the need for a coordinated, multinational, multidisciplinary research plan for multiple stressors.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
AMAP, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme. 2002. Arctic Pollution. AMAP: Oslo, Norway. 111 pp.
Anderson, S., G. Cherr, S. Morgan, C. Vines, R. Higashi, W. Bennett, W. Rose, A. Brooks, and R. Nisbet. 2006. Integrating contaminant responses in indicator saltmarsh species. Marine Environ. Research 62:S317–S321.
Ayotte, P., E. Dewailly, S. Bruneau, H. Careau, and A. Vezina. 1995. Arctic air pollution and human health: what effects should be expected? Sci. of Total Environ. 161:529–537.
Bard, S. 1999. Global transport of anthropogenic contaminants and the consequences fro the arctic marine ecosystem. Marine Pollution Bulletin 38:356–379.
CAS. Chemical Abstracts Service, American Chemical Society. 2005. The latest CAS registry number 7 and substance count. (accessed Oct. 2006) http://www.cas.org/cgi-bin/regreport.pl.
Cassee, F., J. Groten, P. van Bladeren, and V. Feron. 1998. Toxicological evaluation and risk assessment of chemical mixtures. Crit. Rev. Toxicology. 28:73–101.
Cormier, S., S. Norton, and G. Suter, II. 2003. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s stressor identification guidance: A process for determining the probably causes of biological impairments. Hum. Eco. Risk Assess. 9:1431–1443.
Cory-Slechta, D. 2005. Studying toxicants as single chemicals: does this strategy adequately identify neurotoxic risk? Neurotoxicology 26:491–510.
Daughton, C. 2005. “Emerging” chemicals as pollutants in the environment: A 21st century perspective. Renewable Resour. J. 23:6–23.
Dourson, M. and J. Patterson. 2003. A 20-year perspective on the development of non-cancer risk assessment methods. Hum. Eco. Risk Assess. 9:1239–1252.
Duncan, D. 2006. The chemicals within us. National Geographic Society Magazine. October: 116–135.
Eggen, R.I.L., R. Behra, P. Burkhardt-Holm, B.I. Escher, and N. Schweigert. 2004. Challenges in ecotoxicology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38:58a–64a.
Fisher, D. 2005. How we depend on chemicals. (accessed Oct. 2006). http://fluoridealert.org/pesticides/2005/effect.pfos.class.news.133.htm.
Hano, T., Y. Oshima, T. Oe, M. Kinoshita, M. Tanaka, Y. Wakamatsu, K. Ozato, and T. Honjo. 2005. Quantitative bio-imaging analysis for evaluation of sexual differentiation in germ cells of olvas-GFP/ST-II YI medaka (Oryzias latipes) nanoinjected in ovo with ethinylestradiol. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 24:70–77.
Hill, A., H. Teraoka, W. Heideman, and R. Peterson. 2005. Zebrafish as a model vertebrate for investigating chemical toxicity. Toxicol. Sci. 86:6–19.
Hope, B.K. 2005. Performing spatially and temporally explicit ecological exposure assessments involving multiple stressors. Hum. Eco. Risk Assess. 11:539–565.
Iwamatsu, T. 2004. Stages of normal development in the medaka Oryzias latipes. Mech. Dev. 121:605–618.
Kashiwada, S. 2006. Distribution of nanoparticles in the see-through medaka (Oryzias latipes). Environ. Health Perspect. 114:1697–1702.
Kimmel, C., W. Ballard, S. Kimmel, B. Ullmann, and T. Schilling. 1995. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 203:253–310.
McCarty, L. and C. Borgert. 2006. Review of the toxicity of chemical mixtures: theory, policy and regulatory practice. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 45:119–143.
Macdonald, R., T. Harner, and J. Fyfe. 2005. Recent climate change in the Arctic and its impact on contaminant pathways and interpretation of temporal trend data. Sci. Total Environ. 342:5–86.
Muir, D., R. Shearer, J. Van Oostdam, S. Donaldson and C. Furgal. 2005. Contaminants in Canadian arctic biota and implications for human health: Conclusions and knowledge gaps. Sci. Total Environ. 351: 539–546.
Nacci, D., M. Pelletier, J. Lake, R. Bennett, J. Nichols, R. Haebler, J. Grear, A. Kuhn, J. Copeland, M. Nicholson, S. Watlers, and W. Munn, Jr. 2005. An approach to predict risks to wildlife populations from mercury and other stressors. Ecotoxicology 14:283–293.
Relyea, R. 2003. Predator cues and pesticides: a double dose of danger for amphibians. Ecol. Appl. 13:1515–1521.
Sexton, K., B. Beck, E. Bingham, J. Brian, D. DeMarini, R. Hertzberg, E. O’Flaherty, and J. Pounds. 1995. Chemical mixtures from a public health perspective: the importance of research for informed decision making. Toxicology 105:429–441.
Shima, A. and H. Mitani. 2004. Medaka as a research organism: past, present and future. Mech. Dev. 121:599–604.
Silva, E., N. Rajapakse, and A. Kortenkamp. 2002. Something from “nothing”–Eight weak estrogenic chemicals combined at concentrations below NOECs produce significant mixture effects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36:1751–1756.
Sonne, C., P. Leifsson, R. Dietz, E. Born, R. Letcher, L. Hyldstrup, F. Riget, M. Kirkegaard, and D. Muir. 2006. Xenoendocrine pollutants may reduce size of sexual organs in East Greenland polar bears (Ursus maritimus) Environ. Sci. Tech. 40:5668–5674.
Suk, W. and K. Olden. 2005. Multidisciplinary research: Strategies for assessing chemical mixtures to reduce risk of exposure and disease. Hum. Eco. Risk Assess. 11:141–151.
Suter II, G. 2006. Ecological risk assessment and ecological epidemiology for contaminated sites. Hum. Eco. Risk Assess. 12:31–38.
Suter II, G., S. Norton, and L. Barnthouse, 2003. The evolution of frameworks for ecological risk assessment from the red book ancestor. Hum. Eco. Risk Assess. 9:1349–1360.
Suter II, G., D. Rodier, S. Schwenk, M. Troyer, P. Tyler, D. Urgan, M. Wellman, and S. Wharton. 2004. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s generic ecological assessment endpoints. Hum. Eco. Risk Assess. 10:967–981.
Teplitsky, C., H. Phiha, A. Laurila, and J. Merila. 2005. Common pesticide increases costs of antipredator defenses in Rana temporaria tadpoles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39:6979–6085.
Teushcler, L. C. Gennings, W. Hartley, H. Carter, A. Thiyagarajah, R. Schoeny, and C. Cubison. 2005. The interaction effects of binary mixtures of benzene and toluene on the developing heart of medaka (Oryzias latipes). Chemosphere 58:1283–1291.
US DHHS. 2004a. Guidance manual for the assessment of joint toxic action of chemical mixtures. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Washington DC.
US DHHS. 2004b. Interaction profile for persistent chemical found in fish (chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, hexachlorobenzene, p, p-DDE, methylmercury and polychlorinated biphenyls). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Washington DC.
US EPA 2000. Supplementary guidance for conducting health risk assessment of chemical mixtures. EPA/630/R-00/–2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Wakamatsu, Y., S. Pristyazhnyuk, M. Kinoshita, M. Tanaka, and K. Ozato. 2001. The see-through medaka: a fish model that is transparent throughout life. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:10046–10050.
Ward, J. 1995. Radiation mutagenesis − the initial DNA lesions responsible. Radiat. Res. 142:362–368.
Wormley, D., A. Ramesh, and D. Hood. 2004. Environmental contaminant-mixture effects on CNS development, plasticity and behavior. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 197:49–65.
Yang, R. S. H. 2004. Toxicology of Chemical Mixtures. Academic Press, New York.
Yang, R. S. H., H. El-Masri, R. Thomas, I. Dobrev, J. Dennison Jr., D-S. Bae, J. Campain, K. Liao, B. Reisfeld, M. Andersen, and M. Mumtaz. 2004. Chemical mixture toxicology: from descriptive to mechanistic, and going on to in silico toxicology. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 18:65–81.
Zhivotovsky, B. and G. Kroemer. 2004. Apoptosis and genomic instability. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5:752–762.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hinton, T.G., Aizawa, K. (2007). A Layperson's Primer on Multiple Stressors. In: Mothersill, C., Mosse, I., Seymour, C. (eds) Multiple Stressors: A Challenge for the Future. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6335-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6335-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6333-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6335-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)