The theory of cognitive dissonance has had profound impact on research in social psychology, Its influence goes beyond that field, however. The theory has, for example, also figured in the design of interventions to address a variety of societal problems. The chapter offers an overview of the empirical literature on dissonance theory, beginning with Festinger’s (1957) classic definition. The authors cover the most important paradigms used in empirical dissonance research and summarize the most prominent empirical results. They explain the main features of the self-based revision of dissonance theory and introduce their own self-based modification of dissonance theory, including related data on ego-depletion and selective exposure. They conclude by outlining directions for future dissonance research, particularly on self-regulation and information-processing, and discuss the application of dissonance theory to societal problems.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Cognitive Dissonance
- Confirmation Bias
- Experimental Social Psychology
- Selective Exposure
- Dissonance Reduction
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Aronson, E. (1961). The effect of effort on the attractiveness of rewarded and unrewarded stimuli. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 375–380.
Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 5–27). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Aronson, E. (1999). Dissonance, hypocrisy, and the self-concept. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 103–126). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1963). Effect of the severity of threat on the devaluation of forbidden behaviour. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 584–588.
Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 680–740). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Brehm, J. W. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384–389.
Brock, T. C., & Balloun, J. L. (1967). Behavioral receptivity to dissonant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 413–428.
Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 229–262). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Elkin, R. A., & Leippe, M. R. (1986). Physiological arousal, dissonance, and attitude change: Evidence for a dissonance-arousal link and a “don’t remind me” effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 55–65.
Elliot, A. J., & Devine, P. G. (1994). On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 382–394.
Feather N. T. (1962). Cigarette smoking and lung cancer: A study of cognitive dissonance. Australian Journal of Psychology, 14, 55–64.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203–210.
Festinger, L., Riecken, H., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Fischer, P., Frey, D., & Jonas, E. (2007a). Evidence that need for closure increases selective exposure to supporting information. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Fischer, P., Greitemeyer, T., & Frey, D. (2007b). Ego-depletion and selective exposure: The impact of self-regulatory resources on confirmatory information processing. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 41–80). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Frey, D., & Wicklund, R. (1978). A clarification of selective exposure: The impact of choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 132–139.
Harmon-Jones, E. (2000). An update on dissonance theory, with a focus on the self. In A. Tesser, R. Felson, & J. Suls (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on self and identity (pp. 119–144). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Harvey, O. J. (1965). Some situational and cognitive determinants of dissonance resolution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 349–355.
Hoshino-Browne, E., Zanna, A. S., Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., Kitayama, S., & Lackenbauer, S. (2005). On the cultural guises of cognitive dissonance: The case of easterners and westerners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 294–310.
Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink (2nd rev. ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., & Thelen, N. (2001). Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on “selective exposure to information.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 557–571.
Jonas, E., Graupmann, V., Fischer, P., Greitemeyer, T., & Frey, D. (2003). Dissonanz als Wahlkampfhelfer—Konfirmatorische Informationssuche im Kontext der Parteispendenaffäre der CDU [Dissonance as a supporter in an election campaign—Selective exposure in the context of the party donation affair of the CDU]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 34, 47–61.
Kiesler, C. A., & Pallak, M. S. (1976). Arousal properties of dissonance manipulations. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1014–1025.
Kray, L. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2003). The debiasing effect of counterfactual mindsets: Increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in group decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 69–81.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemic and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York: Plenum.
Matz, D., & Wood, W. (2005). Cognitive dissonance in groups: The consequences of disagreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 22–37.
McGregor, I., Zanna, M. P., Holmes, J. G., & Spencer, S. J. (2001). Compensatory conviction in the face of personal uncertainty: Going to extremes and being oneself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 472–488.
Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259.
Nel, E., Helmreich, R., & Aronson, E. (1969). Opinion change in the advocate as a function of the persuasibility of his audience: A clarification of the meaning of dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 117–124.
Norton, M. I., Monin, B., Cooper, J., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). Vicarious dissonance: Attitude change from the inconsistency of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 47–62.
Rhine, R. J. (1967). Some problems in dissonance theory research on information selectivity. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 21–28.
Schmeichel, B. J., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Intellectual performance and ego depletion: Role of the self in logical reasoning and other information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 33–46.
Schulz-Hardt, S. (1997). Realitätsflucht in Entscheidungsprozessen: Vom Groupthink zum Entscheidungsautismus [Escape from reality in decision-making processes: From groupthink to the autism of decisions]. Bern: Huber.
Stalder, D., & Baron, R. S. (1998). Attributional complexity as a moderator of dissonance-produced attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 449–455.
Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261–302). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Steele, C. M. & Liu, T. J. (1983). Dissonance processes as self-affirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 5–19.
Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Lynch, M. (1993). Self-image resilience and dissonance: The role of affirmational resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 885–896.
Stone, J., Aronson, E., Crain, A. L., Winslow, M. P., & Fried, C. B. (1994). Inducing hypocrisy as a means for encouraging young adults to use condoms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 116–128.
Sweeney, P. D., & Gruber, K. L. (1984). Selective exposure: Voter information preferences and the Watergate affair. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1208–1221.
Tesser, A., & Cornell, D. P. (1991). On the confluence of self processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 501–526.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fischer, P., Frey, D., Peus, C., Kastenmüller, A. (2008). The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance: State of the Science and Directions for Future Research. In: Meusburger, P., Welker, M., Wunder, E. (eds) Clashes of Knowledge. Knowledge and Space, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5555-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5555-3_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5554-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5555-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)