Abstract
In recent years, decentralization has become a global trend and it is on the political agenda in many countries. Education is being decentralized in numerous countries as part of a larger move to reform public management systems (Govinda, 2003a). The policies largely aim to reduce government size, reorganize delivery, expand private initiatives, and create new partnerships. Decentralization is having a significant impact on policy, planning, and management of elementary education. With the increasing impact of globalization, the challenges faced by the nations of the world are substantial; hence, the importance of localization through decentralization has intensified. At the same time, decentralization is seen as a means of improving the efficiency of education systems and the quality of educational services. In India, education is the joint responsibility of state and union governments. Ever since decentralization has been promoted in the field of education, different states in India have undergone various decentralization processes with distinct outcomes. The actual manifestation of the process of decentralization, in terms of the rationale put forth as well as operational features adopted, varies widely across the states. The socio-political context and the degree of popular participation in the decision-making process directly influence the outcomes of decentralization measures.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
REFERENCES
Adamolekun, L., Robert, R., & Laleye, M., (1990). Decentralisation policies and socio-economic development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: Economic Development Institute of the World Bank and Pan African Institute for Development.
Bardhan, P. (2001). Social justice in the global economy. Economic and Political Weekly Special Articles (February 3–10), 2001.
Cohen, S. S., Dyckman, J. W., Schoenberger, E., & Downs, C. R. (1981). Decentralization: A framework for policy analysis (pp. 46–48). Berkeley: Institute for International Studies, University of California.
Crook, R., & Manor, J. (2000). Democratic decentralization, operations evaluation department. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Delors, J. (1996). Education: The necessary utopia. In Learning: The treasure within (pp. 13–35). Paris: Report of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century, UNESCO.
Dhar, T. N. (1997). Decentralized management of elementary education: The Indian experience. In R. Govinda (Ed.), Decentralization of Educational Management: Experiences from South Asia (pp. 95–121). Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.
Faguet, J. P. (2001). Does decentralization increase responsiveness to local needs? Evidence from Bolivia. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Govinda, R. (1997). Decentralized management of primary education in South Asia: Policy and Practice. In R. Govinda (Ed.), Decentralization of Educational Management: Experiences from South Asia (pp. 15–72). Paris: UNESCO International Institute of Educational Planning.
Govinda, R. (2001). Capacity building for educational governance at local levels. Paper presented at the International Consultation on Educational Governance at Local Levels, held at UNESCO, Paris, 27–28 February 2001.
Govinda, R. (2003a). Decentralising education: Trends and issues. IIEP Newsletter, XXI(2), 5.
Govinda, R. (2003b). Dynamics of decentralized management and community empowerment in primary education: A comparative analysis of policy and practice in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh. In R. Govinda & R. Diwan (Eds.), Community participation and empowerment in primary education: Indian experience. New Delhi: Sage.
Govinda, R., & Varghese, N. V. (1994). District level plan implementation strategy with particular reference to school improvement. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.
Kantha, V. K., & Narain, D. (2003). Dynamics of community mobilization in a fragmented and turbulent state. In R. Govinda & R. Diwan (Eds.), Community participation and empowerment in primary education. New Delhi: Sage Publishers.
Lauglo, J., & McClean, M. (1985). The control of education: International perspectives on the centralization–decentralization debate. London: Heinamann.
Maclure, R. (1993). School reform in Burkina Faso: The limited prospects of decentralization and local participation. Canadian and International Education, 22(2), 69–85.
Mathur, K. (1985). Small farmers development agency in India: An experiment in controlled decentralization. In G. Shabbir Cheema (Ed.), Rural Development in Asia. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.
Mehta, A. (1978). Report of the Committee of Panchayati Raj Institutions. New Delhi: Department of Rural Development.
Ministry of Human Resource Development. (1995). Report of the CABE Committee on decentralization in education. New Delhi: Government of India.
Myrdal, G. (1968). Asian drama: An inquiry into the poverty of nations. New York: Pantheon.
NCERT. (1972). Report of the Education Commission 1964–66 (p. 12). New Delhi: NCERT.
Slater, D. (1989). Territorial power and the peripheral state: The issue of decentralization. Development and Change, 20(3), 501–531.
Webster, N. (1992). Panchayati raj in West Bengal: Popular participation for the people or the party? Development and Change, 23(4), 129–163.
Weiler, H. N. (1983). Legalization, expertise, and participation: Strategies of compensatory legitimation in educational policy. Comparative Education Review, 27(2): 259–277.
World Bank. (2000). Hidden challenges to education systems in transition economies: A world free of poverty. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Govinda, R., Bandyopadhyay, M. (2006). DECENTRALIZATION OF EDUCATIONAL GOVERNANCE IN INDIA: TRENDS AND ISSUES. In: BJORK, C. (eds) Educational Decentralization. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4358-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4358-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4356-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4358-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)