Abstract
While atomistic simulations have provided great insight into the basic mechanisms of processes like plasticity, diffusion and phase transformations in solids, there is an important limitation to these methods. Specifically, the large number of atoms in any realistic macroscopic structure is typically much too large for direct simulation. Consider that the current benchmark for largescale fully atomistic simulations is on the order of 109 atoms, using massively paralleled computer facilities with hundreds or thousands of CPUs. This represents 1/10 000 of the number of atoms in a typical grain of aluminum, and 1/1 000 000 of the atoms in a typical micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) device. Further, it is apparent that with such a large number of atoms, substantial regions of a problem of interest are essentially behaving like a continuum. Clearly, while fully atomistic calculations are essential to our understanding of the basic “unit” mechanisms of deformation, they will never replace continuum models altogether.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Deformation Gradient
- Atomistic Model
- Atomistic Simulation
- Embed Atom Method
- Shockley Partial Dislocation
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
E.B. Tadmor, M. Ortiz, and R. Phillips, “Quasicontinuum analysis of defects in solids,” Phil. Mag. A, 73, 1529–1563, 1996a.
E.B. Tadmor, R. Phillips, and M. Ortiz, “Mixed atomistic and continuum models of deformation in solids,” Langmuir, 12, 4529–4534, 1996b.
V.B. Shenoy, R. Miller, E. Tadmor, D. Rodney, R. Phillips, and M. Ortiz, “An adaptive methodology for atomic scale mechanics: the quasicontinuum method,” J. Mech. Phys. Sol., 47, 611–642, 1998a.
V.B. Shenoy, R. Miller, E.B. Tadmor, R. Phillips, and M. Ortiz, “Quasicontinuum models of interfacial structure and deformation,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 742–745, 1998b.
R.E. Miller and E.B. Tadmor, “The quasicontinuum method: overview, applications and current directions,” J. of Computer-Aided Mater. Design, 9(3), 203–231, 2002.
M. Ortiz, A.M. Cuitino, J. Knap, and M. Koslowski, “Mixed atomistic continuum models of material behavior: the art of transcending atomistics and informing continua,” MRS Bull., 26, 216–221, 2001.
D. Rodney, “Mixed atomistic/continuum methods: static and dynamic quasicontinuum methods,” In: A. Finel, D. Maziere, and M. Veron (eds.), NATO Science Series II, Vol. 108, “Thermodynamics, Microstructures and Plasticity,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 265–274, 2003.
M. Ortiz and R. Phillips, “Nanomechanics of defects in solids,” Adv. Appl. Mech., 36, 1–79, 1999.
W.A. Curtin and R.E. Miller, “Atomistic/continuum coupling methods in multi-scale materials modeling,” Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., Vol. 11(3), R33–R68, 2003.
A. Carlsson, “Beyond pair potentials in elemental transition metals and semiconductors,” Sol. Stat. Phys., 43, 1–91, 1990.
V. Shenoy, V. Shenoy, and R. Phillips, “Finite temperature quasicontinuum methods,” Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 538, 455–471, 1999.
E. Tadmor, G. Smith, N. Bernstein, and E. Kaxiras, “Mixed finite element and atomistic formulation for complex crystals,” Phys. Rev. B, 59, 235–245, 1999.
M. Daw and M. Baskes, “Embedded-atom method: derivation and application to impurities, surfaces, and other defects in metals,” Phys. Rev. B, 29, 6443–6453, 1984.
J. Norskøv and N. Lang, “Effective-medium theory of chemical binding: application to chemisorption,” Phys. Rev. B, 21, 2131–2136, 1980.
F. Stillinger and T. Weber, “Computer-simulation of local order in condensed phases of silicon,” Phys. Rev. B, 31, 5262–5271, 1985.
O.C. Zienkiewicz, The Finite Element Method, vols. 1-2, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, London, 1991.
J. Ericksen, In: M. Gurtin (ed.), Phase Transformations and Material Instabilities in Solids, Academic Press, New York.
A. Okabe, Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams, Wiley, Chichester, England, 1992.
O.C. Zienkiewicz and J. Z. Zhu, “A simple error estimator and adaptive procedure for practical engineering analysis,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 24, 337–357, 1987.
W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, and B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tadmor, E.B., Miller, R.E. (2005). The Theory and Implementation of the Quasicontinuum Method. In: Yip, S. (eds) Handbook of Materials Modeling. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3286-8_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3286-8_34
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3287-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3286-8
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)