Skip to main content

Preverbs and their origins in Georgian and Udi

  • Chapter
Yearbook of Morphology 2003

Part of the book series: Yearbook of Morphology ((YOMO))

Abstract

The structure of the preverb + stem combination is superficially similar in Georgian, a member of the Kartvelian (South Caucasian) family, and in unrelated Udi, a member of the Lezgian group of the North East Caucasian family. Compare (1) and (2) in this regard. (1) Georgian: mi-v-i-t’an-e thither-1sg-cv-carry-aor ‘I took it (away)’2 (2) Udi: ta-zu-š-er-e thither-1sg-carry-er-aorII ‘I took it (away)’ Of interest here is the fact that in both languages the preverb (mi-, ta-) forms a semantic whole with the verb root (-t’an-,-š-), yet an agreement marker (v-, -ne-) occurs between them. This kind of interruption of a semantic and formal unit is a well recognized problem in linguistics (see, for example, Ackerman and Webelhuth 1998). In this paper it is shown that two quite different histories led to the situation found today and illustrated in (1–2).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, Werner (1997). The interdependence of case, aspect and referentiality in the history of German: The case of the verbal genitive. Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, eds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ans van Kemenade and Nigel Vincent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 29–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, Farrell, and Gerd Webelhuth (1998). A Theory of Predicates. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alekseev, M.E. (1985). Voprosy sravnitel’no-istoričeskoj grammatiki lezginskix jazykov: Morphologija. Sintaksis. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, Robert P. (1974). The Old Georgian version of the Gospel of Mark. Patrologia Orientalis 20, fascicle 3. (First edition, 1928.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, Robert P. (1976). The Old Georgian version of the Gospel of Matthew. Patrologia Orientalis 24, fascicle 1. (First edition 1933.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, Robert P. and Maurice Brière. (1950). The Old Georgian version of the Gospel of John. Patrologia Orientalis 26, fascicle 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brière, Maurice. (1955). La version géorgienne ancienne de L’évangile de Luc. Patrologia Orientalis 27, fascile 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherchi, Marcello (1994). Verbal tmesis in Georgian. Annali del Dipartimento di Studi del Mondo Classico e del Mediterraneo Antico Sezione Linguistica 16, 33–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherchi, Marcello (1997). Verbal tmesis in Georgian, Part II. Annali del Dipartimento di Studi del Mondo Classico e del Mediterraneo Antico Sezione Linguistica 19, 63–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeters, Gerhard (1930). Das khartwelische Verbum. Leipzig: Markert & Petters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria, and Edwin Williams (1987). On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamq’relize, T. (1959). Sibilant’ta šesat’ q’visobani da kartvelur enata uzvelesi st’rukt’uris zogi sak’itxi. [Sibilant correspondences and some questions of the most ancient structure of the Kartvelian languages.] Tbilisi: Ak’ademia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giginejšvili, B.K. (1977). Sravnitel’naja fonetika dagestanskix jazykov. Tbilisi: Universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Alice C. (2000). Where in the word is the Udi clitic? Language 76, 593–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Alice C. (2002). Endoclitics and the Origins of Udi Morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Alice C. (to appear). The prehistory of Udi locative cases and locative preverbs. Festschrift for Howard I. Aronson, ed. Dee Ann Holisky and Kevin Tuite.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Alice C., and Lyle Campbell (1995). Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holisky, Dee Ann (1981). Aspect theory and Georgian aspect. Tense and Aspect (Syntax and Semantics, vol. 14), ed. P.J. Tedeschi and A. Zaenen. New York: Academic Press, 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imnaišvili, I. (1957). Saxelta bruneba da brunvata punkciebi zvel kartulši. [The declension of nouns and the functions of cases in Old Georgian.] Tbilisi: Universit’et’i.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeiranišvili, Evg. (1956). Gramat’ik’uli k’lasis gakvavebuli nišnebi udur zmnebsa da nazmnar saxelebši [Fossilized markers of grammatical class in Udi verbs and deverbal nouns]. Iberiul-k’avk’aziuri enatmecniereba 8, 341–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeiranišvili, Evg. (1971). Udiuri ena [The Udi language]. Tbilisi: Universit’et’i.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorbenaze, B., M. K’obaize, and M. Berize (1988). Kartul enis morpemebisa da modaluri element’ebis leksik’oni. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimov, G.A. (1964). Ètymologičeskij slovar’ kartvel’skix jazykov. Moskva: Akademija.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimov, Georgij A. (1998). Etymological Dictionary of the Kartvelian Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mart’irosovi, Aram (1946). Tandebuli kartulši. [Adpositions in Georgian.] Iberiul-k’avk’aziuri enatmecniereba 1, 203–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mart’irosovi, A. (1956). C’indebulisa da tandebulis ist’oriuli urtiertobisatvis kartulši. [On the historical relationship between preverbs and postpositions in Georgian.] Iberiul-k’avk’aziuri enatmecniereba 8, 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolayev, S.L., and S.A. Starostin (1994). North Caucasian Etymological Dictionary. Moscow: Asterisk Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pančvize, VI. (1974). Uduri enis gramat’ik’uli analizi. [A grammatical analysis of the Udi language.] Tbilisi: Mecniereba.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrixi, Hainc (= Fähnrich, Heinz), and Zurab Sarjvelaze (1990). Kartvelur enata et’imologiuri leksik’oni. [Etymological dictionary of the Kartvelian languages.] Tbilisi: Universit’et’i.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plank, Frans (1980). Encoding grammatical relations: Acceptable and unacceptable non-distinctness. Historical Morphology, ed. Jacek Fisiak. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 289–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šanize, Ak’ak’i (1973 [1953]). Kartuli enis gramat’ik’is sapuzvlebi. [Fundamentals of the grammar of the Georgian language.] Tbilisi: Universit’et’i.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Karl Horst (1969). Zur Tmesis in den Kartvelsprachen und ihren typologischen Parallelen in indogermanischen Sprachen. Giorgi Axvledians. Tbilisi: Universit’et’i, 96–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, Wolfgang. ms (1988). Studien zur Rekonstruktion des Lautstandes der Süd-Ostkaukasischen (Lezgischen) Grundsprache. Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, Wolfgang (1992). Zur Entwicklungsdynamik morphosyntaktischer Subsysteme. Caucasologie et mythologie comparée, ed. Catherine Peters. Paris: 335–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topuria, Varlam (1967 [1931]). Svanuri ena, I: Zmna [The Svan Language, I: The Verb]. [Published as volume I of his Šromebi [Works].] Tbilisi: Mecniereba.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschenkéli, Kita (1958). Einführung in die georgische Sprache, Band 1. Zürich: Amirani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vešap’ize, Irak’li (1967). Zmnisc’ini zvel kartul enaši. [The preverb in the Old Georgian language.] Tbilisi: Universit’et’i.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, Calvert (1963). Preliminaries to a historical and comparative analysis of the syntax of the Old Irish verb. Celtica 6, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, Calvert (1964). Preliminaries to the reconstruction of Indo-European sentence structure. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists, ed. H.G. Lunt. The Hague: Mouton, 1035–1045.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harris, A.C. (2003). Preverbs and their origins in Georgian and Udi. In: Booij, G., Van Marle, J. (eds) Yearbook of Morphology 2003. Yearbook of Morphology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1513-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1513-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1272-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-1513-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics