Skip to main content

Developments in Computing Work: Control and Contradiction in the Software Labour Process

  • Chapter
Workplaces of the Future

Abstract

The labour process literature has tended to show interest in computing not in its own right, but as something which affects its true concerns. It is the embodiment of ‘new technology’ which captures attention, impacting upon (and more likely than not afflicting) work organisation, and potentially threatening to eliminate employment altogether. A distinction between ‘hardware’ and ‘software’ may be vaguely noted, with hardware being ‘the bit you can kick’. The nature of the production system which creates not the machinery but the programs which run on the machinery, so potentially shaping the work of others, has remained a black box in all but a few exceptional studies.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avergou, C. and Cornford, T. (1993a) Developing Information Systems: Concepts, Issues and Practice, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avergou, C. and Comford, T (1993b)’A Review of the Methodologies Movement’, Journal of Information Technology, 5, 277–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansler, J.P. and Bedker, K. (1993) ‘A Reappraisal of Structured Analysis: Design in an Organisational Context’, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 11: 2, 165–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansler, J.P. and Havn, E. (1996) ‘Industrialised Information Systems Development: Procurement and Customization of Generic Software’, Centre for Tele-Information Working Paper, Technical University of Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroudi J.J. and Igbaria M. (1995), ‘An Examination of Gender Effects on Career Success of Information Systems Employees’, Journal of Management Information Systems, 11: 3, 181–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beime, M. and Ramsay, H. (1988) ‘Computer Redesign and “Labour Process” Theory: Towards a Critical Appraisal’ in Knights D. and Willmott, H. (eds) New Technology and the Labour Process, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beime, M., Ramsay, H. and Panteli, A. (1996) ‘Participating Informally: Opportunities and Dilemmas in User-Driven Design’ in Blomberg, J., Kensing, F. and Dykstra-Erickson, E. (eds) Proceedings of the Fourth Biennial Conference on Participatory Design, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, J., Scudder, G. and Van Wassenhove, L. (1996) ‘Improving Speed and Productivity of Software Development: A Global Survey of Software Developers’, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 22: 12, 875–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. and Scholes, J. (1990) Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, A. (1993) ‘Looking for the Designers: Transforming the “Invisible” Infrastructure of Computerised Office Work’, AI and Society, 7, 323–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Computerworld (1995) ‘8th Annual Salary Survey: Unequal Opportunities’, 4 September, 1, 70–72, 74, 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, P. (1980) Quality Is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain, New York: Mentor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, W., Fincham, R. and Hallier, J. (1993) ‘Strategy, Evaluation and Career Development in the Management of IT Projects: A Research Framework’ in COST A3 Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, B., Krasner, H. and Iscoe, N. (1988) ‘A Field Study of the Software Design Process for Large Systems’, Communications of the ACM, 31: 11, 1268–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ershov, A.P. (1972) ‘Aesthetics and the Human Factor in Programming’, Communications of the ACM, 15: 7, 501–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenton N. (1991) Software Metrics: A Rigorous Approach London: Chapman-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, R., Fleck, J., Procter, R., Scarbrough, H., Tierney, M. and Williams, R. (1994) Expertise and Innovation: Information Technology Strategies in the Financial Services Sector Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, S. (1996) Software Failure: Management Failure, Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A.L. and Cornford, D.S. (1989) Computer Systems Development: History, Organisation and Implementation, Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenbaum, J. (1979) In the Name of Efficiency Philadelphia: Temple University

    Google Scholar 

  • Press. Greenbaum, J. (1995) Windows on the Workplace, New York: Monthly Review

    Google Scholar 

  • Press. Grundy, F. (1996) Women and Computers, Exeter: Intellect Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidon, R. and Curtis, B. (1988) ‘Control of Cognitive Processes During Design: What Tools Would Support Software Designers?’ in Conference Proceedings of CHI, Washington DC, Chicago: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurbaxani, V. (1996) ‘The New World of Information Technology Outsourcing’, Communications of the ACM, 39: 7, 45–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. and Gilbert, G.N. (1993) ‘Negotiating the Take-Up of Formal Methods’ in Quintas, P. (ed.) Social Dimensions of Systems Engineering: People, Processes, Policies and Software Development, New York: Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaratna, N (1994) Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies: NIMSAD, A Systemic Framework, Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D. and Murray, F. (1994) Managers Divided: Organisation Politics and Information Technology Management, Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, P. (1977) Programmers and Managers: The Routinisation of Computer Programming in the United States, New York: Springer Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, P. (1987) ‘Computers and the Automation of Work’, in Kraut, R. (ed.) Technology and the Transformation of White Collar Work, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, P. and Dubnoff, S. (1986) ‘Job Content, Fragmentation and Control in Computer Software Work’, Industrial Relations, 25: 2, 184–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M.C. and Hirschheim, R. (1993) Information Systems Outsourcing: Myths, Metaphors and Realities, Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livari, I. (1996) ‘Why Are CASE Tools Not Used?’, Communications of the ACM, 39: 10, 94–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loh, L. and Venkatraman, N. (1992) ‘Diffusion of Information Technology Outsourcing: Influence Sources and the Kodak Effect’, Information Systems Research, 3: 4, 334–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martini. (1984) An Information Systems Manifesto, Engelwood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. and Powell, P. (1992) Information Systems: a Management Perspective, London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, E. (1996) Systems Design: Ethical Tools for Ethical Change, London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. and Miller, J. (1991) ‘Twinkling Lights and Nested Loops: Distributed Problem-Solving and Spreadsheet Development’, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 161–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Computing Centre (1988, 1992, 1993 & 1997 ) ‘Salaries and Staff Issues in Computing’, Annual Reports, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D. (1984) Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation, New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordroyd, R. (1996) ‘Is the IS industry a turn-off for women?’, Sunday Business, 26 May, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. (1988) ‘The Data Processing Occupation: Professionalisation or Proletarianisation?’, Research in the Sociology of Work, 4, 95–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. (1989) ‘Software Work’, Industrial Relations, 25: 2, 184–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panteli, N., Ramsay, H., Stack, J. and Atkinson M. (1997) ‘Women in the UK software industry — how much do we know?’, paper to Women Into Computing Conference, De Montfort University, Milton Keynes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulk M. (1993) ‘Mapping from ISO 9001 to the CMM’, SEI Memorandum, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, R.S. (1992) Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach New York: McGraw-Hill (3rd edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintas, P. (1991), ‘Engineering Solutions to Software Problems: Some Institutional and Social Factors Shaping Change’, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 3: 4, 359–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salzman, H. and Rosenthal, S. (1994) Software By Design, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, C. (1993) Why Information Systems Fail: A Case-Study Approach, Henley-on-Thames: Alfred Waller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. (1992) ‘Its Own Worst Enemy: How Software Engineering Has Fallen Victim to Engineering Mythology’, CRICT Discussion Paper no. 25, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, I. (1989) Software Engineering Wokingham: Addison-Wesley (3rd edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R.J. (1994) What Machines Can’t Do: Politics and Technology in the Industrial Enterprise, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomasson, K. (ed.) (1994), Key Note Market Review: UK Computer Market Middlesex: Key Note (4th edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tudor, D.J. and Tudor, I.J. (1995) Systems Analysis and Design: A Comparison of Structured Methods, Oxford: National Computing Centre / Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willcocks, L.P. and Fitzgerald, G. (1996) ‘IT Outsourcing and the Changing Shape of the Information Systems Function’ in Earl, M.J. (ed.) Information Management: The Organisational Dimension, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.N., Petocz, P. and Roiter, K. (1996) ‘Software Quality Assurance in Practice’, Software Quality Journal, 5, 53–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1998 Martin Beirne, Harvie Ramsay and Androniki Panteli

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beirne, M., Ramsay, H., Panteli, A. (1998). Developments in Computing Work: Control and Contradiction in the Software Labour Process. In: Thompson, P., Warhurst, C. (eds) Workplaces of the Future. Critical Perspectives on Work and Organisations. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26346-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics