Skip to main content

‘But Why Nursing?’

  • Chapter
Divided Sisterhood
  • 2 Accesses

Abstract

‘But why nursing?’ Over the past few years, expressions ranging from polite disinterest to total incredulity have generally greeted my declaration that I have been working on this history. The question itself reveals the public image: worthy, boring, taken for granted and virtually invisible. So the question seems an appropriate starting point for an introduction. Part of the answer — as so often in research — lies in accident. In the early 1980s when Dr Neil Andersson and I were completing our WHO monograph, Health and Apartheid,1 we became aware that very little had been written about women’s health or women as the providers of health services in South Africa. We planned a book on the subject, and I went off to the South African archives as the first stage of our research and tapped ‘women and health’ into the computer. This produced the title of one file: ‘Women of Pretoria complain of the effects on their health of the local native location’; however, the contents had been destroyed. Clearly some lateral thought was necessary, so I tried ‘Nursing’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. B. Bozzoli, ‘Marxism, Feminism and Southern African Studies’, JSAS, vol. 9, no. 2, 1983, pp. 140–2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For the centrality of the sexual division of labour to capitalist enterprise, and the gendered nature of social institutions, see L. Davidoff and C. Hall, Family Fortunes. Men and Women of the English Middle Class, 1780–1850 (Chicago, 1987 ).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gamarnikow, ‘Sexual Division of Labour’, p. 115, citing Florence Nightingale, ‘Letter to the Probationer Nurses in the “Nightingale Fund”’, 6 May 1881.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Summers, ‘Pride and Prejudice: Ladies and Nurses in the Crimean War’, History Workshop, vol. 16, 1983, p. 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Cooper and A.L. Stoler, ‘Introduction. Tensions of Empire: Colonial Control and Visions of Rule’, American Ethnologist, vol. 16, no. 4, November 1989, p. 610.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1994 Shula Marks

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marks, S. (1994). ‘But Why Nursing?’. In: Divided Sisterhood. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23603-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23603-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-23605-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-23603-9

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics