Skip to main content

Economic Reform and Ideological Decay: The Decline of Ideocracy

  • Chapter
Riding the Tiger
  • 25 Accesses

Abstract

The overriding political rationale for economic reform was the desire to rebuild the power and authority of the Communist regime. This could be achieved in part by improvements in popular welfare arising from a successful programme of economic reform. But a major shift in political ideas and institutions was also needed, not only because these had fallen into disrepute and disrepair over the previous decade, but also because they had to be brought into line with the radically different economic system which was the ultimate objective of economic reforms. In trying to re-establish their political hegemony, the CCP leadership faced two major tasks: first, to redefine the official political Ideology in such a way that it became an effective force for legitimating the CCP regime in the context of the ‘socialist commodity economy’; and, second, to re-establish the Party as a coherent and credible political nucleus of the nation in the new economic environment. I shall be discussing these two aspects of political change in this and the next chapters.

‘You can’t teach an old dogma new tricks.’—Dorothy Parker

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See the article by Lin Honglin in People’s Daily, 11 November 1980, in SWB 6576.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For an early critique, see Chi Wei, ‘How the Gang of Four opposed socialist modernisation’, Peking Review, 11 March 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1993 Douglas Gordon White

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

White, G. (1993). Economic Reform and Ideological Decay: The Decline of Ideocracy. In: Riding the Tiger. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22651-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics