Abstract
I have tried in this book to give the reader as wide a review of the principal areas of interest in the sociology of science today. I have been particularly keen to indicate how this work relates to important issues within the field of science policy, to show how this growing body of research can be regarded as more than simply an academic specialty within the discipline. In highlighting the major shifts in the sociology of science I have suggested that it has been able to explore more successfully and interestingly the new directions in which science and technology are moving today. These ‘new directions’ are not simply of a cognitive or conceptual nature — new fields of research for example, such as biotechnology — but also of an institutional character: in fact, both feed back on each other, cognitive developments shaping and being shaped by institutional developments. Biotechnology, for example, has opened new areas for investigation and new forms of investigation as the corporate/academic interface has created novel institutional structures within which the research has been pursued.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Collingridge, D. and C. Reeve (1986) Science Speaks to Power: The Role of Experts in Policy Making (London: Frances Pinter).
Cozzens, S. E. (1986) ‘Funding and Knowledge Growth’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 16, pp. 9–21.
Fujimura, J. (1987) ‘Constructing Do-able Problems in Cancer Research: Articulating Alignment’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 17, pp. 257–93.
Harding, S. (1986) The Science Question in Feminism (Milton Keynes: Open University Press).
Hoch, P. (1990) ‘Institutional Mobility and Science Policy’, Paper presented at ‘Policies and publics for science and technology’ Conference, Science Museum, London.
Hughes, T. (1983) Networks of Power (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
Hull, F. (1988) ‘Inventions from R&D: Organisational Designs for Efficient Research Performance’, Sociology, Vol. 22 (3), pp. 393–415.
Schwarz, M. and M. Thompson (1990) Divided We Stand — Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice (Brighton: Harvester).
Vergragt, P. (1988) ‘The Social Shaping of Industrial Innovations’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 18, pp. 483–513.
Wright, S. (1986) ‘Molecular Biology or Molecular Politics? The Production of Scientific Consensus on the Hazards of Recombinant DNA’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 16, pp. 593–620.
Wynne, B. et al. (1990) ‘Frameworks for Understanding Public Interpretations of Science and Technology’, Paper presented at ‘Policies and Publics for Science and Technology’ Conference Science Museum, London.
Yearley, S. (1988) The Occupational Culture, Organisation and Exploitability of Scientific Work, SPSG Concept Paper no. 6 (London).
Copyright information
© 1991 Andrew Webster
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Webster, A. (1991). Conclusion. In: Science, Technology and Society. Sociology for a Changing World. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21875-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21875-2_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-51065-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21875-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)