Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Sociology for a Changing World ((SCW))

  • 17 Accesses

Abstract

I have tried in this book to give the reader as wide a review of the principal areas of interest in the sociology of science today. I have been particularly keen to indicate how this work relates to important issues within the field of science policy, to show how this growing body of research can be regarded as more than simply an academic specialty within the discipline. In highlighting the major shifts in the sociology of science I have suggested that it has been able to explore more successfully and interestingly the new directions in which science and technology are moving today. These ‘new directions’ are not simply of a cognitive or conceptual nature — new fields of research for example, such as biotechnology — but also of an institutional character: in fact, both feed back on each other, cognitive developments shaping and being shaped by institutional developments. Biotechnology, for example, has opened new areas for investigation and new forms of investigation as the corporate/academic interface has created novel institutional structures within which the research has been pursued.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Collingridge, D. and C. Reeve (1986) Science Speaks to Power: The Role of Experts in Policy Making (London: Frances Pinter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozzens, S. E. (1986) ‘Funding and Knowledge Growth’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 16, pp. 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujimura, J. (1987) ‘Constructing Do-able Problems in Cancer Research: Articulating Alignment’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 17, pp. 257–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1986) The Science Question in Feminism (Milton Keynes: Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, P. (1990) ‘Institutional Mobility and Science Policy’, Paper presented at ‘Policies and publics for science and technology’ Conference, Science Museum, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. (1983) Networks of Power (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, F. (1988) ‘Inventions from R&D: Organisational Designs for Efficient Research Performance’, Sociology, Vol. 22 (3), pp. 393–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, M. and M. Thompson (1990) Divided We Stand — Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice (Brighton: Harvester).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergragt, P. (1988) ‘The Social Shaping of Industrial Innovations’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 18, pp. 483–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1986) ‘Molecular Biology or Molecular Politics? The Production of Scientific Consensus on the Hazards of Recombinant DNA’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 16, pp. 593–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, B. et al. (1990) ‘Frameworks for Understanding Public Interpretations of Science and Technology’, Paper presented at ‘Policies and Publics for Science and Technology’ Conference Science Museum, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yearley, S. (1988) The Occupational Culture, Organisation and Exploitability of Scientific Work, SPSG Concept Paper no. 6 (London).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1991 Andrew Webster

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Webster, A. (1991). Conclusion. In: Science, Technology and Society. Sociology for a Changing World. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21875-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics