Abstract
Controlling science and technology is an exceptionally difficult task. Who or what should one control: scientists, their institutions, wider technological systems? And for what purpose: what direction are we to take, whose interests are we to serve? And since, as we have seen, science and technology are malleable, socially negotiated, institutionally located and without clear boundaries, then what is ‘it’ that we are trying to control?
We should be on our guard not to overestimate science and scientific methods when it is a question of human problems; and we should not assume that experts are the only ones who have a right to express themselves on questions affecting the organisation of society.
Albert Einstein (1949)
For ‘undue public concern’ one should always read ‘perfectly reasonable terror’.
Lucy Ellman (1990)
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, G. C. (1990) ‘Congress cracks down’, Nature, Vol. 343, 15 Feb. p. 580.
Beier, R. (ed.) (1986) Feminist Appoaches To Science (New York: Pergamon Press).
Bernal, J. D. (1939) Social Function of Science (London: Routledge).
Boggs, C. (1986) Social Movements and Political Power (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).
Clark, N. (1985) The Political Economy of Science and Technology (Oxford: Blackwell).
Cole, J. (1979) Fair Science: Women in the Scientific Community (New York: Free Press).
Collins, H. M. (1987) ‘Certainty and the Public Understanding of Science: Science on Television’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 17, pp. 689–713.
Corea, G. et al. (1985) Man-made Women (London: Hutchinson).
Cromwell, G. (1989) ‘Government policy and alternative strategies for appropriate technology choice’, Science and Public Policy, Vol. 16 (4), pp. 202–10.
Delamont, S. (1987) ‘Three Blind Spots?’ Social Studies of Science, Vol. 17, pp. 163–70.
Dickson, D. (1984) The New Politics of Science (New York: Pantheon).
Einstein, A. (1946) ‘Why Socialism?’, Monthly Review (Hebrew University).
Ellman, L. (1990) Guardian, 5 Feb., p. 20.
Elzinga, A. (1988) ‘Bernalism, Comintern and the Sciences of Science: Central Science Movements Then and Now’, in J. Annerstadt and A. Jamison (eds), From Research Policy to Social Intelligence (London: Macmillan).
French, R. D. (1975) Antivivisectionism and Medical Science in Victorian Society (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Griffiths, D. (1985) ‘The exclusion of women from technology’, in W. Faulkner and E. Arnold (eds), Smothered by Invention (London: Pluto Press).
Ince, M. (1986) The Politics of British Science (Brighton: Wheatsheaf).
Inglehart, R. (1987) The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Jones, G. et al. (1978) The Presentation of Science by the Media (Primary Communications Research Centre: University of Leicester).
Jordanova, L. (1989) Sexual Visions: images of gender in science and medicine between the eighteenth and twentieth centuries (Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf).
Keller, E. F. (1985) Reflections on Gender and Science (London: Yale University Press).
Kuznick, P. J. (1987) Beyond the Laboratory: scientists as political activists in 1930s America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Lewis, G. (1986) ‘Regulatory Mechanisms and the Control of Medicinal Drugs — the case of DepoProvera’, Science, Technology Society Association Newsletter, no 24, Spring, pp. 43–7.
Lowe, P. and J. Goyder (1983) Environmental Groups in Politics (London: Allen & Unwin).
Lukes, S. (1979) Power: A Radical View (London: Macmillan).
McRobie, G. (1980) Small Is Possible (New York: Harper and Row).
Nelkin, D. (1984) Controversy (second edition) (London: Sage).
Newby, H. (1987) Country Life (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson).
Papadakis, E. (1988) ‘Social Movements, Self-Limiting Radicalism and the Green Party in West Germany’, Sociology, Vol. 22 (3), pp. 433–54.
Petchesky, R. P. (1987) ‘Foetal Images: the Power of Visual Culture in the Politics of reproduction’, in M. Stanworth (ed) Reproductive Technologies (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Ravetz, J. R. (1982) ‘The social functions of science’, Science and Public Policy, Vol. 9 (5).
Reskin, B. (1978) ‘Sex Discrimination and Social Organisation of Science’, in J. Gaston (ed), Sociology of Science (San Francisco: Jossey Bass).
Richards, E. and J. Schuster (1989) ‘The Feminine Method as Myth and Accounting Resource’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 19, pp. 697–720.
Rose, H. and S. (eds) (1976) The Political Economy of Science (London: Macmillan).
Rose, H. (1987) ‘Hand, Brain and Heart: A Feminist Epistemology for the Natural Sciences’, in S. Harding and J. F. O’Barr (eds), Sex and Scientific Inquiry (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Royal Society (1985) The Public Understanding of Science London).
Rupke, N. (1987) (ed.), Vivisection in Historical Perspective (London: Croom Helm).
Schiebinger, L. (1987) ‘The History and Philosophy of Women In Science: A Review Essay’, in S. Harding and J. F. O’Barr (eds), Sex and Scientific Inquiry (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Schumacher, E. F. (1973) Small Is Beautiful (Harmondsworth: Penguin).
Stanworth, M. (1987) (ed.), Reproductive Technologies (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Werskey, P. G. (1978) The Visible College (London: Allen Lane).
Wynne, B. (1988) ‘Unruly Technology: Practical Rules, Impractical Discourses and Public Understanding’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 18, pp. 146–67.
Young, R. (1977) ‘Science is social relations’, Radical Science Journal, Vol. 5.
Yoxen, E. (1988) Public Concern and the Steering of Science, SPSG Concept Paper no. 5 (London).
Copyright information
© 1991 Andrew Webster
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Webster, A. (1991). Controlling Science and Technology: Popular and Radical Alternatives. In: Science, Technology and Society. Sociology for a Changing World. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21875-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21875-2_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-51065-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21875-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)