Skip to main content

Repetition Time

Notes Around ‘Structural/materialist Film’

  • Chapter
Questions of Cinema

Part of the book series: Communications and Culture ((COMMCU))

  • 39 Accesses

Abstract

The term ‘materialist’ in the expression ‘structural/materialist film’ used to characterize a certain development of work in avant-garde independent film-making1 has to be understood away from any simple reference to the physical materiality of film. ‘Materialist’ stresses process, a film in its process of production of images, sounds, times, meanings, the transformations effected on the basis of the specific properties of film in the relation of a viewing and listening situation. It is that situation which is, finally, the point of ‘structural/materialist film’, its fundamental operation, the experience of film, and the experience of film.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Note

  1. See Peter Gidal (ed.) Structural Film Anthology (London: British Film Institute, 1976)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Malcolm Le Grice, Abstract Film and Beyond (London: Studio Vista, 1977); unattributed quotations in the present text are either from those sources or from various unpublished pieces of writing by Gidal and are taken as representative of emphases constantly made. ‘Structural/materialist film’ is an indication of a certain practice and a rough grouping accordingly, not ‘a movement’; it would include works by the following (amongst others): Gidal, Le Grice, Michael Snow, Peter Kubelka, Kurt Kren, William Raban, Gill Eatherley, David Crosswaite, Fred Drummond.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roland Barthes, Le Plaisir du texte (Paris: Seuil, 1973) p. 43; translation, The Pleasure of the Text (London: Cape, 1976) p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jacques Lacan, Le Séminaire livre XI (Paris: Seuil, 1973) p. 60; translation, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho Analysis (London: Hogarth Press, 1977) p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christian Metz, ‘Le signifiant imaginaire’, Communications no. 23 (1975) pp. 34–5; translation, ‘The imaginary signifier’, Screen vol. 16 no. 2 (Summer 1975) pp. 51–2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jacques Lacan, Ecrits (Paris: Seuil, 1966) p. 840.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1981 Stephen Heath

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heath, S. (1981). Repetition Time. In: Questions of Cinema. Communications and Culture. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16579-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics