Skip to main content

Unity or Diversity?

  • Chapter
The Enlightenment

Part of the book series: Studies in European History ((SEURH))

  • 303 Accesses

Abstract

Amongst the values dearest to Enlightenment thinkers was cosmopolitanism. Claiming that reason shed the same light all over the world, the philosophes commonly insisted that there was a single universal standard of justice, governed by one normative natural law — and indeed that there was a single uniform human nature, all people being endowed with fundamentally the same attributes and desires, ‘from China to Peru’. Thus one of the favourite literary genres of writers such as Montesquieu was to assume the persona of a foreign ‘anthropologist’ (such as a Persian sage) visiting Europe — as a way of satirising the vices and follies not just of Europe but of mankind as a whole [88].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1990 Roy Porter

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Porter, R. (1990). Unity or Diversity?. In: The Enlightenment. Studies in European History. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09885-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09885-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-45414-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-09885-9

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics