Skip to main content

The Reagan Administration and the 1980s

  • Chapter
US Military Power in the 1980s

Part of the book series: RUSI Defence Studies Series ((RUSIDS))

  • 18 Accesses

Abstract

So far we have attempted to establish the main features of American military power from both the conventional and nuclear perspectives without pretending that one is independent of the other. In a superpower confrontation, the utility of conventional forces is as valid as the nuclear deterrent which underpins them; but the credibility of the nuclear balance depends to a large extent on matching the Soviet conventional build-up. At the same time both rely upon the domestic base: technological innovation, the management of defence budgets and the willingness of Congress to vote funds for defence. The strengths and weaknesses of the domestic base are important to recognise, particularly as they cast doubt on the reliability of American forces. As long as the weaknesses persist they will continue to bring into question the credibility of America’s contribution to the Atlantic Alliance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes and References

  1. Richard Haas, Congressional Power: Implications for American Security Policy, Adelphi Paper 153 (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1979) p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cited Thomas A. Dine, ‘Politics of the Purse’, in Alan Platt and Lawrence D. Weiler (eds), Congress and Arms Control (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1978) pp. 59–96.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Richard P. Cronin, An Analysis of Congressional Reductions in the Defence Budget: Fiscal Year 1971–76 (Washington, DC: CRS, 1976) p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cited Peter Foot, ‘Defence Burden Sharing in the Atlantic Community, 1945–54’, Aberdeen Studies in Defence Economics, 20, Summer 1981, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. James Fallows, National Defence (New York: Random House, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. James Fallows, ‘America’s High Tech Weaponry’, The Atlantic, 247, 5, May 1981, pp. 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cited Loren Thompson, ‘The Defence Industrial Base: Going, going …’, International Security Review, 6, 2, Summer 1981, pp. 237–72.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. J. Deitchman, New Technology and Military Power (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1979),

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. A. Stockfish, Plowshares into Swords: Managing the American Defence Establishment (New York: Mason and Lipscomb, 1973) pp. 150–89.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Murray Weidenbaum, The Economics of Peacetime Defence (New York: Praeger, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martin Binkin, Paying the Modern Military (Washington DC: Brookings, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1983 RUSI

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coker, C. (1983). The Reagan Administration and the 1980s. In: US Military Power in the 1980s. RUSI Defence Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06909-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics