Skip to main content
  • 49 Accesses

Abstract

It would be a disservice to suggest that my images of policy analysis sprang full blown from imagination, or with the exact order into which these ideas have been pressed here. These conceptions are shaped by what was happening to me—devising a curriculum for a school of public policy, as much in an effort to understand analysis as to teach it—and to the country—the social programs of the sixties, filtered through one to two hundred analyses a year done by students and colleagues. That I came to analysis via the study of budgeting, in which politics and economics are intertwined, may account for my refusal to dissolve one into the other and my preference for trying to keep them together as political economy. Though now I think of myself as a political economist, I was first a political scientist. The capacity to make decisions in the future, to mobilize support for substance—that is, political rationality—is as least as important as generating economic growth so that there will be resources to allocate. Since policy analysis is about people, a category in which I am forced to include myself, my experiences matter.

“What is Policy Analysis? Why do you ask?”

Anonymous

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; Or Why It’s Amazing That Federal Programs Work at All by Jeffrey L. Pressman and Aaron B. Wildaysky (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Jeanne Nienaber, Aaron Wildaysky, The Budgeting and Evaluation of Federal Recreation Programs, or Money Doesn’t Crow on Trees ( New York: Basic Books, 1973 ).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Aaron Wildaysky and Naomi Caiden, Planning and Budgeting in Poor Countries (New York: John Wiley, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Michael D. Cohen, James G. March, and John P. Olsen, “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 2, pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For a fascinating discussion see Robert K. Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure, revised ed. ( New York: Free Press, 1968 ), pp. 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For an excellent discussion, see Arnold Meltsner, Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy(Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. As quoted by R. K. Merton in The Sociology of Science in Europe, R. K. Merton and Jerry Gaston, eds. ( Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1977 ), P. 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1979 Aaron Wildavsky

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wildavsky, A. (1979). Introduction. In: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04955-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics