Abstract
It would be a disservice to suggest that my images of policy analysis sprang full blown from imagination, or with the exact order into which these ideas have been pressed here. These conceptions are shaped by what was happening to me—devising a curriculum for a school of public policy, as much in an effort to understand analysis as to teach it—and to the country—the social programs of the sixties, filtered through one to two hundred analyses a year done by students and colleagues. That I came to analysis via the study of budgeting, in which politics and economics are intertwined, may account for my refusal to dissolve one into the other and my preference for trying to keep them together as political economy. Though now I think of myself as a political economist, I was first a political scientist. The capacity to make decisions in the future, to mobilize support for substance—that is, political rationality—is as least as important as generating economic growth so that there will be resources to allocate. Since policy analysis is about people, a category in which I am forced to include myself, my experiences matter.
“What is Policy Analysis? Why do you ask?”
Anonymous
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; Or Why It’s Amazing That Federal Programs Work at All by Jeffrey L. Pressman and Aaron B. Wildaysky (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1973).
See Jeanne Nienaber, Aaron Wildaysky, The Budgeting and Evaluation of Federal Recreation Programs, or Money Doesn’t Crow on Trees ( New York: Basic Books, 1973 ).
See Aaron Wildaysky and Naomi Caiden, Planning and Budgeting in Poor Countries (New York: John Wiley, 1974).
See Michael D. Cohen, James G. March, and John P. Olsen, “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 2, pp. 1–25.
For a fascinating discussion see Robert K. Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure, revised ed. ( New York: Free Press, 1968 ), pp. 3–7.
For an excellent discussion, see Arnold Meltsner, Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy(Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1978).
As quoted by R. K. Merton in The Sociology of Science in Europe, R. K. Merton and Jerry Gaston, eds. ( Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1977 ), P. 3.
Copyright information
© 1979 Aaron Wildavsky
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wildavsky, A. (1979). Introduction. In: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04955-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04955-4_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-04957-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-04955-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)