Skip to main content

Abstract

All parties behave differently in government and opposition. The balance of power in the party is transformed as the leader becomes prime minister and as his front bench colleagues acquire ministerial position and become obsessed with decisionmaking and day-to-day business. The contrast between opposition and government has always been most marked in the case of the Labour party. The role of the National Executive and the Annual Conference in the formation of party policy provides constant opportunities for the activist to press for bolder socialist measures. But Labour ministers after 1974 were increasingly aware of the limitations of the real world. In this case they had to live with a narrow and then a non-existent parliamentary majority and under severe economic constraints. The Labour government in 1974–9 was far more obviously at odds with the party machine than it had been in 1964–70. It was as if there were two Labour parties, one with the voice of the NEC and Conference and the other with that of the parliamentary leadership.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See L. Minkin, The Labour Party Conference, (London, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Newham dispute led to repeated court actions in the climax of which the constituency moderates sought a High Court order nullifying actions of the NEC. Lord Denning and the Court of Appeal rejected this, which could have set a precedent for almost unlimited litigation in party disputes. But the action did bring out grave defects in party rules and led to frantic activity in the National Agents’ department. See Lord Denning’s judgement, The Times, February 8, 1978. See also P. McCormick, Enemies of Democracy, (London, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See C. Hitchens, The Tribune Group goes missing’, New Statesman (July 21, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  4. for a full discussion of party accounts, see M. Pinto-Duschinsky, British Political Finance, (Washington, 1980) and for further detail on the 1979 election

    Google Scholar 

  5. see M. Pinto-Duschinsky’s chapter in H. Penniman, ed. Britain at the Polls 1979 (Washington, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sec T. Forester, ‘Labour’s local parties’ New Society, (September 25, 1975);

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. and D. Martin, The Decline of Labour Party Membership’ Political Quarterly, (October 1977);

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Seyd and L. Minkin, ‘The Labour Party and its Members’, New Society, (September 20, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Linton,‘The Membership Mystery’ Labour Weekly, (September 28, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1980 David Butler and Dennis Kavanagh

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Butler, D., Kavanagh, D. (1980). Labour in Office. In: The British General Election of 1979. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04755-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics