Skip to main content
  • 23 Accesses

Abstract

The previous chapters of this book confirmed that a major reason for the long-term decline in Britain’s competitiveness in manufactured goods has been an inability to compete in innovative products and processes. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the performance of British management in the light of current knowledge about the successful management of innovative firms. The discussion will concentrate on British weaknesses in managing innovation, because Britain’s economic performance in general suggests that the weaknesses highlighted here are widespread. This book, however, also reveals some strengths, such as the steady commitment of the chemical industry to innovative activities, and the considerable British achievement in technical innovation and international competitiveness in coalmining machinery. There are also examples of retrenchment and recovery, for example, in textile machinery. The British weaknesses are neither universal, nor irremediable. We discuss them here in the hope of stimulating action that will eventually eliminate them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boston Consulting Group Ltd, Strategy Alternatives for the British Motorcycle Industry, a report prepared for the Secretary of State for Industry (London: HMSO, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. F. Carter and B. R. Williams, Industry and Technical Progress (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Coombs, P. Gardiner, M. Gibbons and R. Johnstone, Technology Change and the UK Tractor Industry, Interim Report for the Department of Industry, Department of Liberal Studies, Manchester University, July (unpublished, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Coventry Workshop’, draft report commissioned by the Coventry Machine Tool Workers Committee (Coventry: 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Footwear Industry Study Group, Report (London: HMSO, April 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. H. Hayvaert, Innovation Research and Product Policy: Clinical Research in 12 Belgian Industrial Enterprises, Catholic University of Louvain, Belgium (unpublished, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Langrish et al., Wealth with Knowledge (London: Macmillan, 1972).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • S. Myers and D. G. Marquis, ‘Successful Industrial Innovation’National Science Foundation (Washington, D.C.: NSF 69–17, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. F. Pratten, A Comparison of the Performance of Swedish and UK Companies, Department of Applied Economics, Occasional Paper no. 47 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Rothwell et al., ‘SAPPHO Updated: Project SAPPHO Phase II’, Research Policy, 3 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Rothwell, Innovation in Textile Machinery: Some Significant Factors in Success and Failure, Science Policy Research Unit, Occasional Paper Series no. 2 (University of Sussex, Science Policy Research Unit, June 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Rothwell, ‘The Characteristics of Successful Innovators and Technically Progressive Firms’ (with some comments on innovation research), R and D Management, 7: 3 (June 1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Rubenstein et al., ‘Management Perceptions of Government Inventives to Technological Innovation in England, France, West Germany and Japan’, Research Policy 6 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Schock, Innovation Processes in Dutch Industry, TNO Industrial Research Organisation (Apeldoorn, The Netherlands: TNO, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. D. Szakasits, ‘The Adoption of the SAPPHO method in the Hungarian Electronics Industry’, Research Policy 3 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Utterback, T. Allen and J. H. Holloman, The Progress of Innovation in Five Five Industries in Europe and Japan, Centre for Policy Alternatives, MIT (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1980 Science Policy Research Unit

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rothwell, R. (1980). Policies in Industry. In: Pavitt, K. (eds) Technical Innovation and British Economic Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04561-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics