Skip to main content

Abstract

In this chapter, we bring together many of our results and discuss their implications for model-builders and policy-makers. As indicated below, these results have implications for economists interested in modeling the process of technological change, for economists and lawyers interested in formulating and carrying out public policy toward the giant corporation, for scientists and social scientists interested in various aspects of public policy-making concerning science and technology, and for managers, industrial scientists, and operations researchers interested in helping firms to utilize science and technology more effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For example, see B. Klein, “The Decision Making Problem in Development,” in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (National Bureau of Economic Research, 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Merton Peck and F. M. Scherer, The Weapons Acquisition Process (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Jewkes, D. Sawers, and R. Stillerman, The Sources of Invention, revised edition (New York: W. W. Norton, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Richard Nelson, Merton Peck, and Edward Kalachek, Technology, Economic Growth, and Public Policy (Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edwin Mansfield, The Economics of Technological Change (New York: W. W. Norton, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  6. For some examples of this lack of coordination in other firms, see A. Gerstenfeld, Effective Management of Research and Development (Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Edwin Mansfield, Industrial Research and Technological Innovation (New York: W. W. Norton for the Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics at Yale University, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robert Seiler, Improving the Effectiveness of Research and Development (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Roberts, “Questioning the Cost-Effectiveness of the R and D Procurement Process,” in Research Program Effectiveness, ed. by M. Yovits, D. Gilford, R. Wilcox, E. Staveley, and H. Lerner (New York: Gordon and Breach, 1966.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1971 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mansfield, E., Rapoport, J., Schnee, J., Wagner, S., Hamburger, M. (1971). Conclusions. In: Research and Innovation in the Modern Corporation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01639-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics