Skip to main content

‘They Brought It on Themselves and It Never Happened’: Denial to 1939

  • Chapter
The Armenian Genocide Legacy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in the History of Genocide ((PSHG))

Abstract

In Western societies with established democratic traditions, citizens above a certain social class can count on their rights to personal safety and the safety of their property. Social institutions such as the police and the courts are empowered to enforce these rights. Often, however, people are unmindful of how recently established these rights are. Up until the late 18th century it is fair to say that most people had few codified rights. They lived at the will of their rulers, who could do with them largely as they wished. Choices were limited. Those who had some influence with the powers that be would use it while the rest were left to lie low and hope for the best. Or they could flee. Or, if conditions were propitious or sufficiently desperate, they could rebel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. L. A. Davis (1989) The Slaughterhouse Province: An American Diplomat’s Report on the Armenian Genocide ( New Rochelle, NY: Aristide D. Caratzas).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Adalian (1991–3) Guide to the Armenian Genocide in the U.S. Archives, 1915–1918 (Alexandria, VA: Chadwick-Healey); Gust (2013);

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Ohandjanian (2004) 1915 Irrefutable Evidence: The Austrian Documents on the Armenian Genocide (Yerevan: National Academy of Sciences, Museum-Institute of the Armenian Genocide);

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Sarafian (1994–2002) United States Official Documents on the Armenian Genocide, Volumes 1–4 (Watertown, MA: The Armenian Review);

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anon. (1917) Germany, Turkey and Armenia: A Selection of Documentary Evidence Relating to the Armenian Atrocities from German and Other Sources (London: J. J. Keliher & Co., Ltd).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bryce and Toynbee [1916] (2005); Miller and Miller (1999); V. Svazlian (2011) The Armenian Genocide: Testimonies of the Eyewitness Survivors ( Yerevan: Gitoutyoun Publishing House of the National Academy of Sciences).

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Atkinson (2000) ‘The German, The Turk, and the Devil Made a Triple Alliance’: Harpoot Diaries, 1908–1917 ( Reading, UK: Taderon Press );

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bryce and Toynbee (2000); M. Jacobsen (2001) Diaries of a Danish Missionary: Harpoot, 1907–1919 ( Reading, UK: Taderon Press );

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Morley (2000) Marsovan, 1915: The Diaries of Bertha Morley ( Reading, UK: Taderon Press);

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Riggs (1997) Days of Tragedy in Armenia: Personal Experiences in Harpoot, 1915–1917 ( Ann Arbor, MI: Gomidas Institute ).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Kloian (1985) The Armenian Genocide: News Accounts from the American Press, 1915–1922 ( Richmond, CA: ACC Books ).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Akçam (2004) From Empire to Republic: Turkish Nationalism and the Armenian Genocide ( London: Zed Books);

    Google Scholar 

  13. Akçam (2007); Akçam (2012); D. Bloxham (2007) The Great Game of Genocide: Imperialism, Nationalism, and the Destruction of the Ottoman Armenians ( Oxford: Oxford University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dadrian (1995); V. Dadrian (1999) Warrant for Genocide: Key Elements of Turco-Armenian Conflict ( New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers);

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Der Matossian (2014) Shattered Dreams of Revolution: From Liberty to Violence in the Late Ottoman Empire ( Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. M. Göçek (2014) Denial of Violence: Ottoman Past, Turkish Present, and Collective Violence against the Armenians, 1789–2009 ( Oxford: Oxford University Press );

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Kévorkian (2011); Robertson (2014); R. Suny (2015) They Can Live in the Desert but Nowhere Else: A History of the Armenian Genocide ( Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Üngör (2011); C. Walker (1980) Armenia: Survival of a Nation ( London: Croom Helm); Winter (ed.) (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Examples include B. Lewis (1961) The Emergence of Modern Turkey ( Oxford: Oxford University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Kinzer (2001) Crescent & Star (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux);

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Mango (1999) Atatürk ( New York: The Overlook Press);

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. J. Zürcher (1993) Turkey: A Modern History ( London: I. B. Tauris).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Retaliation killings of perpetrator groups are an understudied aspect of Genocide Studies; nevertheless, there are known documented instances. The best known case involves the millions of Germans who lived in German-occupied Eastern Europe during the Second World War. See E. Langenbacher (2009) ‘Ethical Cleansing?: The Expulsion of Germans from Central and Eastern Europe’, in N. A. Robins and A. Jones (eds) Genocides by the Oppressed: Subaltern Genocide in Theory and Practice ( Bloomington: Indiana University Press ), pp. 61–2. See also A. Jones (2009) ‘When the Rabbit’s Got the Gun: Subaltern Genocide and the Genocidal Continuum’, in Robins and Jones (eds) ( 2009 ), pp. 191–3.

    Google Scholar 

  24. His speech was reprinted as ismet Pasha (1923) ‘Turkey Denounces Five Centuries of Calumny’, New York Times Current History, Vol. 17 (5): 749–57.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid.: 757 [emphasis added]. On Armenians, see Akçam (2004), Akçam (2012), and Walker (1980). On Armenians and Kurds, see Üngör (2011), Chapters 1–3, passim. On Jews, see R. Bali (2012) Model Citizens and the State: The Jews of Turkey during the Multi-Party Period ( Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  26. D. Kouymjian (1985) ‘The Destruction of Armenian Historical Monuments as a Continuation of the Turkish Policy of Genocide’, in G. Libaridian (ed.) A Crime of Silence, The Armenian Genocide: The Permanent People’s Tribunal ( London: Zed Books ), p. 174. Also see Chapter 6, Guibert and Kim.

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. Chester (1922) ‘Turkey Reinterpreted’, New York Times Current History, Vol. 16 (6): 941–2.

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. T. Chester (1923) ‘Angora and the Turks’, New York Times Current History, Vol. 17 (5): 763.

    Google Scholar 

  29. E. Minasian (2007) Musa Dagh ( Nashville, TN: Cold Tree Press ), pp. 6–7; see also Walker (1980), pp. 223–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Levon Chorbajian

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chorbajian, L. (2016). ‘They Brought It on Themselves and It Never Happened’: Denial to 1939. In: Demirdjian, A. (eds) The Armenian Genocide Legacy. Palgrave Studies in the History of Genocide. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-56163-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-56163-3_11

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57402-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56163-3

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics