Abstract
According to publications and statements by the Turkish government, the question of genocide in the late Ottoman Empire is ultimately a question of intent. The Turkish Foreign Ministry, as well as many contemporary Turkish and US-based scholars, argues that Ottoman imperial leaders lacked genocidal intent during the First World War and its aftermath because Armenians, Assyrians and Greeks rebelled against the government, killed Turkish and Kurdish civilians, and survived in some areas of the empire, including Constantinople, Smyrna, Aleppo and Mosul. These factors allegedly indicate an intention on the part of Ottoman officials to engage in military operations rather than to target civilian communities for destruction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2007) The Armenian Allegation of Genocide: The Issue and the Facts, http://www.mfa.gov.tr/the-armenian-allegationof-genocide-the-issue-and-the-facts.en.mfa;
Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2011) Questions, http://www.mfa.gov.tr/questions.en.mfa;
Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Embassy in Washington (2007) What Others Are Saying About the Armenian Issue, http://web.archive.org/web/20120727221028/http://vasington.be.mfa.gov.tr/ShowInfoNotes.aspx?ID=121351;
Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Center for Strategic Research (2007) The Armenian Genocide? Facts and Figures, http://www.mfa.gov.tr/data/DISPOLITIKA/ErmeniIddialari/ArmenianGenocideFactsandFigures Revised.pdf;
Turkish Armed Forces, Turkish General Staff [Türk Silahli Kuwetleri: Genelkurmay Başkanliği] (2005) [Ermeni Sorunu], http://web.archive.org/web/20050228091658/http://www.tsk.mil.tr/uluslararasi/ermenisorunu.htm.
J. Salt (2014) ‘Armenians and Syria: 1915 and 2013’, AVIM Report No. 1, p. 6.
C. Bassiouni (2012) Introduction to International Criminal Law (2nd rev. edn.) (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff ), pp. 643–4.
V. N. Dadrian (1998) ‘The Historical and Legal Interconnections Between the Armenian Genocide and the Jewish Holocaust: From Impunity to Retributive Justice’, Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 23 (2): 503–59;
M. MacMillan (2007) Paris 1919: Six Months that Changed the World ( New York: Random House ), pp. 159–60, 171, 223 and 481;
R. Melson (1992) Revolution and Genocide: On the Origins of the Armenian Genocide ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press ), p. 139.
V. Dadrian (1994) ‘Documentation of the Armenian Genocide in German and Austrian Sources’, in I. Charny (ed.), The Widening Circle of Genocide: Genocide, A Critical Bibliographic Review ( New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers ), p. 109.
Quoted in V. Dadrian (1996) German Responsibility in the Armenian Genocide: A Review of the Historical Evidence of German Complicity ( Watertown: Blue Crane ), p. 60.
G. Acquaviva, M. Fan and A. Whiting (2011) International Criminal Law: Cases and Commentary ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ), pp. 214–15, citing from Jelisic´ Appeals Judgement. See Chapter 4, Robertson, on specific intent.
Morgenthau (1918), pp. 333–5. See also McCarthy et al. (1996); E. Erickson (2013) Ottomans and Armenians: A Study in Counterinsurgency ( New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
R. Lemkin (2008) Raphael Lemkin’s Dossier on the Armenian Genocide ( Glendale, CA: Center for Armenian Remembrance ), pp. 2–5.
F. D. Greene (1985) The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, its Antecedents and Significance ( New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons ), pp. 7, and 11–15.
A. Khosroeva (2007) ‘The Assyrian Genocide in the Ottoman Empire and Adjacent Territories’, in R. G. Hovannisian (ed.) The Armenian Genocide: Cultural and Ethical Legacies ( New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers ), p. 268.
Quoted in T. Hofmann (2012) ‘The Genocide of the Christians in the Late Ottoman Period, 1912–1922’, in G. N. Shirinian (ed.) The Asia Minor Catastrophe and the Ottoman Greek Genocide: Essays on Asia Minor, Pontos, and Eastern Thrace, 1912–1923 ( Bloomington, IN: The Asia Minor and Hellenic Research Council, Inc. ), p. 45.
V. N. Dadrian (2003) The History of the Armenian Genocide: Ethnic Conflict from the Balkans to Anatolia to the Caucasus ( 4th edn.) (New York: Berghahn Books ), p. 203.
G. Lewy (2005) The Armenian Massacres in Ottoman Turkey: A Disputed Genocide ( Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press ), p. 250.
Rummel (1998). See also J. McCarthy (2014) The Ottoman Turks: An Introductory History to 1923 ( London: Routledge ), pp. 364, and 380;
J. McCarthy (2010) The Turk in America: The Creation of an Enduring Prejudice ( Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press ), pp. 222–3. See Chapter 2, Bijak and Lubman, for a review of McCarthy’s death toll estimates.
B. Clark (2006) Twice a Stranger: The Mass Expulsions that Forged Modern Greece and Turkey ( Cambridge: Harvard University Press ), p. 13.
S. Yee (2004) ‘The Tu Quoque Argument as a Defence to International Crimes, Prosecution or Punishment’, Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol. 3 (1): 103–16.
T. Taylor (1970) Nuremberg and Vietnam: An American Tragedy ( Chicago, IL: Quadrangle Books ), pp. 140–1.
E. Markusen and D. Kopf (2010) ‘Was It Genocidal?’, in I. Primoratz (ed.) Terror from the Sky: The Bombing of German Cities in World War II ( New York: Berghahn Books ), p. 167.
R. J. Rummel (1994) Death by Government ( New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers ), p. 114.
United Nations War Crimes Commission (1948), Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals: Four Genocide Trials ( New York: Howard Fertig Publications ), pp. 21–39, 62–3, 90–1 and 125–37;
H. Travis (2012) ‘On the Original Understanding of the Crime of Genocide’, Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal, Vol. 7 (1): 30–52, (31 and 36). See also
W. A. Schabas (2009), Genocide in International Law: The Crime of Crimes ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ), pp. 159–66, and 388.
S. T. Katz (2009) ‘The Uniqueness of the Holocaust: The Historical Dimension’, in A. Rosenbaum (ed.) Is the Holocaust Unique? Perspectives on Comparative Genocide ( 3rd edn.) (Boulder, CO: Westview Press ), pp. 68–73;
B. Lewis (2014) Notes on a Century: Reflections of a Middle East Historian ( London: Penguin ), pp. 205, and 209–10.
Trial of the War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Nuremberg, October 1946–April 1949, Germany (Territory under Allied occupation, 1945–1955: U.S. Zone), Vol. 14, Case 11: U.S. v. von Weizsaecker (Ministries case) (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1949), p. 241. See also R. Ainsztein (1974) Jewish Resistance in Nazi-occupied Eastern Europe: With a Historical Survey of the Jew as Fighter and Soldier in the Diaspora ( New York: Barnes and Noble Books);
M. Grubsztein and M. M. Kohn (eds) (1972) Jewish Resistance During the Holocaust: Proceedings of the Conference on Manifestations of Jewish Resistance, Jerusalem, April 7–11, 1968 ( Jerusalem: Yad Vashem ), p. 222;
S. B. Bowman (2009) ‘Freedom or Death’, in S. B. Bowman (ed.) The Agony of Greek Jews, 1940–1945 ( Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press );
Y. D. Stefanidis (1992) ‘Macedonia in the 1940s’, in I. Hassiotis and I. Koliopoulos (eds) Modern and Contemporary Macedonia, Volume II ( Thessaloniki: Paratiritis and Papazisis ), pp. 104–37;
United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (2008) Armed Jewish Resistance: Partisans, http://www.ushmm.org.
Ankara’s support of Lewy’s work is developed in J. A. Kéchichian (2007) ‘A Response to Michael Gunter’s Review of the Armenian Massacres in Ottoman Turkey: A Disputed Genocide (IJMES Vol. 38(4) (2006): 598–601), International Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. 39(3): 509–12 (510).
A. Jones (2004) ‘Introduction: History and Complicity’ in A. Jones (ed.) Genocide, War Crimes and the West: History and Complicity ( London: Zed Books ), pp. 4–25.
M. Shaw (2007b) ‘The General Hybridity of War and Genocide’, Journal of Genocide Research, Vol. 9 (3): 461–73;
M. Shaw (2007a) What is Genocide? ( Cambridge: Polity Press ), p. 24.
M. Shaw (2011) ‘From Comparative to International Genocide Studies: The International Production of Genocide in Twentieth-Century Europe’, European Journal of International Relations (May): 1–24.
R. Lemarchand (2011) ‘Introduction’ in R. Lemarchand (ed.) (2011) Forgotten Genocides: Oblivion, Denial, and Memory ( Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press ), p. 9.
P. Bartrop (2002) ‘The Relationship between War and Genocide in the Twentieth Century: A Consideration’, Journal of Genocide Research, Vol. 4 (4): 519–32 (524)
Hague Convention 1899; Hague Convention 1907, Annex: Regulations Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land (Hague Regulations);
A. M. de Brouwer (2005) Supranational Criminal Prosecution of Sexual Violence: The ICC and the Practice of the ICTY and the ICTR ( Amsterdam: Intersentia ), p. 199;
J. Henckaerts (1995) Mass Expulsion in Modern International Law and Practice ( Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff ), p. 151;
L. Moir (2009) ‘Conduct of Hostilities–War Crimes’, in J. Doria, H. Gasser and M. Cherif Bassiouni (eds) The Legal Regime of the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Igor Blishchenko ( Leiden: Brill ), pp. 518, 521 and 526; Prosecutor v. Anto Furundžija, Case No. IT-95–17/1, Appeals Chamber, Judgement (21 July 2000), para. 210.
Travis (2012), p. 35, citing 7 UN GAOR, 3rd sess., Part 1, Summary Records of Meetings 21 September–10 December 1948, Seventy-Fifth Meeting, U.N. Doc. No. A/C.6/SR.75 (15 October 1948), pp. 115–16; Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu, Case No. ICTR-96–4-T, Trial Chamber I, Judgement (2 September 1998), paras. 502–4; Blagojevic´ Trial Judgement, paras. 607–9; S. Gorove (1951) ‘The Problem of “Mental Harm” in the Genocide Convention’, Washington University Law Quarterly, Vol. 1951 (2): 174–80 (175) Jones (2010), pp. 13–14, citing
S. R. Ratner and J. Abrams (2001), Accountability for Human Rights Atrocities in International Law: Beyond the Nuremberg Legacy ( 2nd edn.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press ), pp. 30–2.
R. Lemkin (1950) The Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide, unpublished manuscript (New York Public Library Raphael Lemkin Papers Collection), p. 2.
International Criminal Court, Elements of Crimes, Art. 6(b), note 4, ICCASP/1/3 ( September 2002 ). See also, R. Cryer, H. Friman, D. Robinson and E. Wilmshurst (2010) An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ), p. 215.
K. Wergen (2014) ‘Problematic Precedents: The Conflicting Legacies in the Genocide Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’, Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 54(2): 463–500 (470).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Hannibal Travis
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Travis, H. (2016). Counterinsurgency as Genocidal Intent: From the Ottoman Christians to the Bosnian Muslims. In: Demirdjian, A. (eds) The Armenian Genocide Legacy. Palgrave Studies in the History of Genocide. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-56163-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-56163-3_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57402-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56163-3
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)