Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Socio-Legal Studies ((PSLS))

Abstract

The financial and credit crises that engulfed the world in 2008 have heralded, at both the level of individual states and from supra-national bodies such as the EU, a confusing plethora of reports and recommendations that in some jurisdictions, for example, the US, have resulted in extensive legislative intervention. In the UK, government-commissioned inquiries, parliamentary inquiries and independent reports have looked at numerous different dimensions of financial ‘life’ and the result has been a series of codes of practice that seek to inculcate behavioural change rather than create new regulatory frameworks. No stone has gone unturned in the mission to account for failed banks, banks too big to fail, perceived excessive executive compensation and the role of institutional investors. Each sector with responsibility for the financial services industry, governments and regulatory bodies have been keen to explain blame and responsibility away while asserting that each is the appropriate level at which to situate preventative regulation for the future. It is with this last segment of the account, institutional investment, and its role within the wider community of ‘savers’ that this chapter is concerned; focusing its attention on the UK. In its four sections the chapter looks at the nature of shareholding and the social and economic expectations that it carries for a variety of participating groups. It examines current patterns of share ownership and explains why these have changed so radically in the last 40 years. Finally, it turns to the recent Stewardship Code (Financial Reporting Council (FRC), 2010a) to consider whether this offers a new way forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arcot, S, V Bruno and A Faure-Grimaud (2010) ‘Corporate Governance in the UK: Is the Comply or Explain Approach Working?’ 30 International Review of Law and Economics 193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augar, P (2000) The Death of Gentlemanly Capitalism (London: Pengu in Books)

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, J (2002) ‘Regulatory Conversations’ 29 Journal of Law and Society 163–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R (2006) ‘Finance and the Fourth Dimension’ 39 New Left Review 39–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, D (2003) ‘The UK Pension System: Key Issues’ 8 Pensions: An International Journal 330–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgen, P and T Meyer (2005) ‘When Do Benevolent Capitalists Change Their Mind? Explaining the Retrenchment of Defined-Benefit Pensions in Britain?’ 39 Social Policy and Administration 764–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, C (2010–2011) ‘Corporate Governance Reform in a Time of Crisis’ 36 Journal of Corporate Law 309–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, A and N Campbell (1998) ‘The Roles of the Public and Private Sectors in the UK Pensions System’ in M Feldstein (ed.), Privatising Social Security (Chicago IL: Chicago University Press), pp. 99–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, P and S Wong (2011) ‘Recent Trends in Institutional Investor Responsibilities and Stewardship’ 16 Pensions 80–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadbury (1992) Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, Sir Adrian Cadbury (chair) (Gee: London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, C, L Hayes, K Ranjan and P Bernal (2008) ‘Ethical Stewardship–Implications for Leadership and Trust’ 78 Journal of Business Ethics 153–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, C and R Karri (2005) ‘Organizational Governance and Ethical Systems: A Covenantal Approach to Building Trust’ 58 Journal of Business Ethics 249–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheffins, B (2010) ‘The Stewardship Code’s Achilles’ Heel’ 73 Modern Law Review 985–1025

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G and T Hebb (2004) ‘Corporate Engagement: The Fifth Stage of Capitalism’ Industrial Relations 142–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G, L Knox-Hayes and K Strauss (2009) ‘Financial Sophistication, Salience and the Scale of Deliberation in Retirement Planning’ 41 Environment and Planning A 2496–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffee, J (1991) ‘Liquidity Versus Control: The Institutional Investor as Corporate Monitor’ 91 Colorado Law Review 1277–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffee, J (2000–2001) ‘Do Norms Matter?’ 149 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2151–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C, D Dalton and A Cannella Jr (2003) ‘Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data’ 28 Academy of Management Review 371–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis J, F Schoorman and L Donaldson (1997) ‘Towards a Stewardship Theory of Management’ 22 Academy of Management Review 20–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S, J Lukomnik and D Pitt-Watson (2006) The New Capitalists (Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobek, M (1993) ‘Privatization as a Political Priority: The British Experience’ XLI Political Studies 24–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L and J Davis (1991) ‘Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns’ 16 Australian Journal of Management 49–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelen, E (2003) ‘The Logic of Funding European Pension Restructuring and the Dangers of Financialisation’ 35 Environment and Planning A 1357–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erturk, I, J Froud, S Johal, A Leaver and K Williams (eds) (2008) Financialization at Work (London: Routledge)

    Google Scholar 

  • Erturk, I, J Froud, A Leaver, K Williams and S Johal (2007) ‘The Democratization of Finance? Promises, Outcomes and Conditions’ 14 Review of International Political Economy 553–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton, B and K Burgess (2011) ‘Murdoch Survives as BSkyB Head after Investor Revolt’ Financial Times, 29 November, www.ft.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, M and P Matos (2008) ‘The Colors of Investors’ Money: The Role of Institutional Investors around the World’ 88 Journal of Financial Economics 499–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Reporting Council (FRC) (2010) The UK Stewardship Code www.frc.org.uk/…/UK%20Stewardship%20Code%20July%2020103.pdf

  • Financial Reporting Council (FRC) (2010a) Implementation of the UK Stewardship Code www.frc.org.uk/FRC-Documents/FRC/Implementationof-the-UK-Stewardship-code. aspx

  • Financial Reporting Council (FRC) (2011) The Impact and Implementation of the UK Corporate Governance and Stewardship Codes www.frc.org.uk/ publications/pub2672.html

  • French, S and J Kneale (2009) ‘Excessive Financialization: Insuring Lifestyles, Enlivening Subjects, and Everyday Spaces of Biosocial Excess’ 27 Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 1030–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Froud J, C Haslem, S Johal and K Williams (2000) ‘Shareholder Value and Financialization: Consultancy Promises, Management Moves’ 29 Economy and Society 80–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Services Authority (FSA) (1999) Consumer Education: A Strategy for Promoting Public Understanding of the Financial System www.fsa.gov.uk/ pubs/policy/p16.pdf.

  • Financial Services Authority (FSA) (2004) Building Financial Capability in the UK (FSA: London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Services Authority (FSA) (2006) Financial Capability in the UK: Establishing a Baseline (FSA: London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillan, S and L Starks (2007) ‘The Evolution of Shareholder Activism in the United States’ 19 Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 55–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyatt, D (2008) ‘Pension Collaboration: Strength in Numbers’ 1 Rotman International Journal of Pension Management 46–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, J (1995) ‘Political Voice, Fiduciary Activism, and the Institutional Ownership of US Corporations: The Role of Public and Non-corporate Pension Funds’ 38 Sociological Perspectives 415–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, J (2006) ‘Owners or Traders? Conceptualizations of Institutional Investors and their Relationship with Corporate Managers’ 59 Human Relations 1101–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, M (2012) ‘Towards an Understanding of the Psychology of Stewardship’ 37(2) Academy of Management Review 172–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • High Pay Commission (2011) More for Less: What has Happened to Pay at the Top and Does it Matter? http://highpaycentre.org/img/High_Pay_Commission_More_for_Less.pdf

  • Hill, J (2010) ‘The Rising Tension Between Shareholder and Director Power in the Common Law World’ 18 Corporate Governance 344–59

    Google Scholar 

  • HMSO (1998) A New Contract for Welfare: Partnership in Pensions Cm 4179 (HMSO: London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Honoré, A (1961) ‘Ownership’ in A Guest (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 107–47

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Treasury Committee (2009) Banking Crisis: Reforming Corporate Governance and Pay in the City HC 519 (London: The Stationery Office)

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Directors (IOD) (2010) Response to FRC Consultation on the Stewardship Code (London: IOD) www.frc.org.uk/corporate/stewardship. cfm

  • Investment Management Association (IMA) (2007) Survey of Fund Managers’ Engagement with Companies (London: IMA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Investment Management Association (IMA) (2009) Survey of Fund Managers’ Engagement with Companies (London: IMA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Investment Management Association (IMA) (2011) Adherence to the FRC’s Stewardship Code www.investmentfunds.org.uk/research/stewardship-survey

  • Ireland, P (1996a) ‘Capitalism without the Capitalist: The Joint Stock Company Share and the Emergence of the Modern Doctrine of Separate Corporate Personality’ 17 Journal of Legal History 41–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, P (1996b) ‘Corporate Governance, Stakeholding and the Company: Towards a Less Degenerate Capitalism’ 23 Journal of Law and Society 287–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, P (2009) ‘Financialization and Corporate Governance’ 60 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Institutional Shareholders’ Committee (ISC) (1991) The Responsibilities of Institutional Shareholders in the UK www.ivis.co.uk/ResponsibilitiesOfInstitutionalShareholdersInTheUK. aspx

  • Institutional Shareholders’ Committee (ISC) (2005) The Responsibilities of Institutional Shareholders and Agents: Statement of Principles www.archive.manifest.co.uk

  • Institutional Shareholders’ Committee (ISC) (2009) The Responsibilities of Institutional Shareholders and Agents: Statement of Principles www.institutionalshareholderscommittee.org.uk/…/ISCCode161109.pdf

  • Jackson, G (2008) ‘A New Financial Capitalism? Explaining the Persistence of Exit over Voice in Contemporary Corporate Governance’ 5 European Management Review 23–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay Review (2012) Kay Review of UK Equity Markets and Long-Term Decision Making, Final Report www.bis.gov.uk/kayreview

  • Keasey, K and G Veronesi (2008) ‘Lessons from the Northern Rock Affair’ 16 Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance 8–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P (2006a) ‘Securitising Suburbia: The Transformation of Anglo-American Mortgage Finance’ 10 Competition and Change 283–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P (2006b) ‘The Making of Investor Subjects in Anglo-American Pensions’ 24 Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 919–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P (2007) ‘Uncertain Subjects of Anglo-American Financialization’ 65 Cultural Critique 67–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W and M O’Sullivan (2000) ‘Maximising Shareholder Value: A New Ideology for Corporate Governance’ 29 Economy and Society 13–35

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, I (2010) ‘Activism and Collaboration Among Shareholders in UK Listed Companies’ 5 Capital Markets Law Journal 419–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, C (2008) ‘Institutional Shareholders: Their Role in the Shaping of Corporate Governance’ 1 International Journal of Corporate Governance 97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark, R (2011) ‘The Quality of Corporate Governance within Financial Firms in Stressed Markets’ in J Hawley, S Kamath and A Williams (eds), Corporate Governance Failures (Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press), pp. 52–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R (2002) Financialization of Daily Life (Philadelphia PA: Temple University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Myners, P (2001) Institutional Investment in the United Kingdom: A Review http://archive.treasury.gov.uk/docs/2001/myners_report0602.html

  • Myners, P (2009a) ‘Speech to the Association of Investment Companies’, 21 April http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/speech_fsst_210409.htm

  • Myners, P (2009b) ‘Speech to the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF)’, 12 March http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/speech_fsst_120309.htm

  • Myners, P (2009c) ‘Leading Questions: Paul Myners’, 1 August http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8179024.stm

  • Nolan, R (2003) ‘Indirect Investors: A Greater Say in the Company?’ 3 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 73–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, R (2006) ‘The Continuing Evolution of Shareholder Governance’ 65 Cambridge Law Journal 92–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Kelly, C (2009) ‘History Begins: Shareholder Value, Accountability and the Virtuous State’ 60 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 35–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics (ONS) (1990) Social Trends (London: Office for National Statistics)

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2009) Wealth in Great Britain (London: Office for National Statistics)

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2010a) The Share Ownership Survey 2008 (London: Office for National Statistics)

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2010b) Pension Trends, May 2010 (London: Office for National Statistics)

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2011) Pension Trends, April 2011, September 2011 (London: Office for National Statistics)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichhadze, A (2010) ‘The Nature of Corporate Ownership in the USA: The Trend towards the Market Oriented Blockholder Model’ 5 Capital Markets Law Journal 63–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M (2009) ‘Reputational Risk as a Logic of Organizing in Late Modernity’ 30 Organization Studies 301–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, T (1995–1996) ‘The Social Limits to Privatization’ 21 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 213–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisberg, A (2011) ‘The Notion of Stewardship from a Company Law Perspective’ 18(2) Journal of Financial Crime 126–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P (2005) ‘Security in Pension Provision: A Critical Analysis of UK Government Policy’ 34 Journal of Social Policy 343–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roach, L (2011) ‘The UK Stewardship Code’ 11 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 463–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushworth, J and M Schluter (2008) ‘The Relational Company: Exploring a New Business Vehicle www.relationshipsfoundation.org/Web/OnlineStore/ Product.aspx?ID.

  • Ryan, L and M Schneider (2002) ‘The Antecedents of Institutional Investor Activism’ 27 Academy of Management Review 554–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler (July 2002) Medium and Long-Term Retail Savings in the UK (Sandler Review) (London: National Archives)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sievers, B (2003) ‘Your Money or Your Life? Psychotic Implications of the Pension Fund System: Towards a Socio-analysis of the Financial Services Revolution’ 56 Human Relations 187–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, L (2010) The Coming of Shareholder Stewardship, Legal Studies Research Paper no 22, University of Warwick, School of Law

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomorrow’s Company (2004) Restoring Trust www.forceforgood.com/ Uploaded_Content/… /23920081718811.pd f

  • Tomorrow’s Company (2008) Tomorrow’s Owners: Stewardship of Tomorrow’s Company www.forceforgood.com/Uploaded…/tool/30102008153435518. pdf

  • Tomorrow’s Company (2009) Tomorrow’s Owners: Defining, Differentiating and Rewarding Stewardship http://tomorrowscompany.com/tomorrows-ownersdefining-differetiating-and-rewarding-stewardship

  • Walker, D (2009) A Review of Corporate Governance in UK Banks and Other Financial Industry Entities (July) http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/walker_review_information. htm

  • Wong, S (2010) ‘Why Stewardship is Proving Elusive for Institutional Investors’ Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law 406–11

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Sally Wheeler

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wheeler, S. (2013). From Responsible Saver to Stewarded Investor?. In: Feenan, D. (eds) Exploring the ‘Socio’ of Socio-Legal Studies. Palgrave Macmillan Socio-Legal Studies. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-31463-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics