Skip to main content

The National Political Culture and Institutions in Nepal

  • Chapter
The Post-Colonial States of South Asia
  • 66 Accesses

Abstract

Diversity is the norm in the political cultures of the South Asian states. They all must contend with a wide variety of political, social, religious, and ethnic traditions and values in their efforts to construct coherent and integrated national societies. India was the only state in the subcontinent that formally adopted ‘unity in diversity’ as its operating principle for national integration tasks at independence, but the others have had to pursue similar strategies in fact, if not in form. While the results have not always been particularly impressive, the latter have had some success in integrating a national political culture that is usually identified as modern, with subnational cultures based on religion, ethnicity, language, local customs and values, or a combination of some or all of these. The subnational cultures are commonly classified as traditional and seen as potentially fissiparous forces. Full integration has certainly not been achieved, but there has been substantial progress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Ludwig E Stiller, The Rise of the House of Gorkha (New Delhi: Manjusri Publishing House, 1973) for a detailed analysis of the formation and organisation of a national political system in the post-1770 period in Nepal.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rishikesh Shaha, An Introduction to Nepal (Kathmandu: Ratna Pustak Bhandar, 1976), 4; Bhuwan Lal Joshi and Leo E. Rose, Democratic Innovations in Nepal (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1966), 1; and Ludwig F. Stiller, The Silent Cry: The People of Nepal, 1816–39 (Kathmandu: Sahayogi Prakashan, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Prayag Raj Sharma, ‘Caste, Social Mobility and Sanskritization: A Study of Nepal’s Old Legal Code’, Kailash 4, 1977, 277–299. I have also discussed this in ‘Secularization of Hindu Polity: the Case of Nepal’ in Donald E. Smith, ed., Religion and Political Modernization (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974), 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Satish Kumar, Rana Polity in Nepal (New Delhi: Asia Publishing House, 1967); and Pramede Shamshere Rana, Rana Nepal: An Insider’s View (Kathmandu: R. Rana, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Prayag Raj Sharma, op. cit.; Mahesh C. Regmi, ‘Preliminary Notes on the Nature of Rana Law and Government’, INAS Journal 2(2), 1975, 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daniel Edward, in ‘Patrimonial and Bureaucratic Administration in Nepal’ (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago, 1977) discusses the extensive ‘modernisation’ of the administrative system under the Rana regime.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harka Gurung, ‘Sociology of the 1981 Election in Nepal’, Asian Survey 21 (12), December 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a thorough study of the role of parties in the ‘non-party’ system in Nepal, see Lok Raj Baral, Opposition Politics in Nepal (New Delhi: Abhinav Publications, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2001 Amita Shastri and A. Jeyaratnam Wilson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rose, L.E. (2001). The National Political Culture and Institutions in Nepal. In: Shastri, A., Wilson, A.J. (eds) The Post-Colonial States of South Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-11508-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics