Skip to main content

The Fragile Base of Democracy in Pakistan

  • Chapter
The Post-Colonial States of South Asia
  • 65 Accesses

Abstract

On 12 October 1999, Chief of Army Staff General Pervez Musharraf overthrew the elected government of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, suspended the national and provincial legislatures, placed the constitution in abeyance, and arrested Sharif and his key associates in a bloodless coup. The military was given both a motive and an excuse to reimpose direct military rule for the fourth time in Pakistan’s history by the political leadership’s failure to successfully oversee the transformation of the political system from authoritarianism to participatory democracy. From the restoration of democracy in 1988 to the military coup of 1999, despite the presence of elected governments, the constitutional framework remained weak and ineffective, and democratic norms failed to take root. Regrettably, little progress was made towards accommodating internal pressures and demands for socio-economic equality and a pluralistic, participatory system. As a result, Sharif’s declining domestic legitimacy gave a disgruntled and ambitious military leadership an opportunity to assume direct control of the state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Hassan N. Gardezi, Understanding Pakistan: The Colonial Factor in Societal Development (Lahore: Maktaba Fikr-o-Danish, 1991), 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Richard Symonds, The Making of Pakistan, 2nd edn (Lahore: Islamic Book Service, 1987), 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marvin G. Weinbaum, ‘Civic Culture and Democracy in Pakistan’, Asian Survey 36(7), July 1996, 640–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Talukdar Maniruzzaman, Group Interests and Political Changes: Studies of Pakistan and Bangladesh (New Delhi: South Asian Publishers, 1982), 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. On 8 October 1958 General Ayub Khan declared, ‘Our ultimate aim is to restore democracy but of the type that people can understand and work’. Cited in Lawrence Ziring, The Ayub Khan Era: Politics in Pakistan 1958–1969 (Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press, 1971), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hasan Askari-Rizvi, The Military and Politics in Pakistan 1947–86, 3rd edn (Lahore: Progressive Publishers, 1986), 170.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shahid Javed Burki, State and Society in Pakistan 1971–1977 (London: Macmillan, 1980), 55.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lawrence Ziring, Pakistan in the Twentieth Century: A Political History (Karachi: Oxford University Press, 1997), 375.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hina Jilani, Human Rights and Democratic Development in Pakistan (Lahore: Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, 1998), 72.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Louis D. Hayes, Politics in Pakistan: The Struggle for Legitimacy (Boulder, Colorado: Westview, 1984), 76.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Only the National Assembly, in which the Punjab (the military’s main recruitment ground) had a majority of seats could exercise financial powers: Rafi Raza, ed., Pakistan in Perspective 1947–1997 (Karachi: Oxford University Press, 1997), 26.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The president’s powers to dissolve the National Assembly were contained in Article 58 (2) (a), and Article 58 (2) (b). For details Makdoom Ali Khan, ed., The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 (Karachi: Pakistan Law House, 1986), 40; and Gholam G. Choudhury, Pakistan: Transition from Military to Civilian Rule (Essex: Scorpion Publishing Ltd., 1988), 166.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saeed Shafqat, ‘Pakistan under Benazir Bhutto’, Asian Survey 36(7), July 1996, 659–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mushahid Hussain and Akmal Hussain, Pakistan: Problems of Governance (New Delhi: Konark Publishers, 1993), 101–2.

    Google Scholar 

  15. William L. Richter, ‘The 1990 General Elections in Pakistan’, in Charles H. Kennedy, ed., Pakistan: 1992 (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1993), 24.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shahid Javed Burki, ‘Economic Policy After Ziaul Haq’, in Charles H. Kennedy, ed., Pakistan: 1992, 52.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mohammad Waseem, ‘Pakistan Elections 1997: One Step Forward’, in Craig Baxter and Charles H. Kennedy, ed., Pakistan: 1997 (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1997), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Robert LaPorte, Jr., ‘Pakistan in 1996: Starting Once Again’, Asian Survey 37(2), February 1997, 118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Anwar H. Syed, ‘Pakistan in 1997: Nawaz Sharif’s Second Chance to Govern’, Asian Survey 38(2), February 1998, 119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. The Anti-Terrorist Act of August 1997 gave civilian and military law-enforcing agents powers of investigation and arrest and to set up special courts to try alleged perpetrators, with no recourse to judicial appeal except through specially constituted tribunals: Samina Ahmed, ‘Pakistan at Fifty: A Tenuous Democracy’, Current History 96(614), December 1997, 424.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ismail Khan, ‘Up in Arms’, Newsline, July 1998, 46–48.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Quoted in Zahid Husain, ‘Sharif’s Last Refuge’, Newsline, September 1998, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zahid Hussain, ‘Beating a Hasty Retreat’, Newsline, July 1999, 23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2001 Amita Shastri and A. Jeyaratnam Wilson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ahmed, S. (2001). The Fragile Base of Democracy in Pakistan. In: Shastri, A., Wilson, A.J. (eds) The Post-Colonial States of South Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-11508-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics