Skip to main content

The Specter of Inferiority: Devaluing the Disabled and “Unproductive”

  • Chapter
From Darwin to Hitler
  • 207 Accesses

Abstract

When the French social Darwinist Georges Vacher de Lapouge wrote the introduction to the 1897 French edition of Haeckel’s Monism as Connecting Religion and Science, he rang the death knell for the three main ideals of the French Revolution: liberty, equality, and fraternity. To replace these allegedly outmoded and unscientific liberal dogmas, he argued that the Darwinian revolution had introduced a new, improved triad: determinism, inequality, and selection.1 Lapouge agreed with Clemence Royer, who wrote in her 1862 preface to her French translation of Darwin’s Origin of Species, “What is the result of this exclusive and unintelligent protection accorded to the weak, the infirm, the incurable, the wicked, to all those who are ill-favored by nature? It is that the ills which have afflicted them tend to be perpetuated and multiplied indefinitely; that evil is increased instead of diminishing, and tends to grow at the expense of good.”2 Lapouge’s views found more resonance in Germany than in his native France, probably due in part to the stress on biological inequality in the writings of other German social Darwinists and eugenicists, who prepared the soil in Germany for the spread of Lapouge’s ideas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Jennifer Michael Hecht, “The Solvency of Metaphysics: The Debate over Racial Science and Moral Philosophy in France, 1890–1919,” Isis 90 (1999): 5–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oscar Schmidt, “Darwinismus und Socialdemokratie,” Deutsche Rundschau 17 (1878): 289–90.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alfred Blaschko, “Natürliche Auslese und Klassentheilung,” Die neue Zeit 13, 1 (1894–95): 615.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Emil Reich, “Evolutionistische Ausblicke,” Dokumente des Fortschritts 1 (1908): 711.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Karl Kautsky, “Medizinisches,” Die neue Zeit 10, 1 (1891–92): 644–5

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hugo Ribbert, Heredity, Disease and Human Evolution (New York: Critic and Guide, 1918), 57.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alfred Grotjahn, “Das Problem der Entartung,” Archiv für soziale Hygiene 6 (1910): 74.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Edward Ross Dickinson, “Reflections on Feminism and Monism in the Kaiserreich, 1900–1913,” Central European History 34 (2001): 191–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ann Taylor Allen, “German Radical Feminism and Eugenics, 1900–1918,” German Studies Review 11 (1988): 31–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kevin Repp, “‘More Corporeal, More Concrete’: Liberal Humanism, Eugenics, and German Progressives at the Last Fin de Siècle,” Journal of Modern History 72 (2000): 683–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Quote in Helene Stöcker, “Geburtenrückgang und Monismus,” in Der Düsseldorfer Monistentag, 47; see also Helene Stöcker, “Von neuer Ethik.” Mutterschutz 2 (1906): 3–11

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stöcker, “Mutterschutz und Sexualreform,” Das monistische Jahrhundert 2 (1913): 14–18

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stöcker, “Staatlicher Gebärzwang oder Rassenhygiene?” Die neue Generation 10 (1914): 134–49

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stöcker, “Rassenhygiene und Eheatteste,” Die neue Generation 13 (1917): 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Max von Gruber, “Vererbung, Auslese und Hygiene,” Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 35 (1909): 1993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ludwig Jens, “Was kosten die schlechten Rassenelemente den Staat und die Gesellschaft,” Archiv für soziale Hygiene 8 (1913): 322.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ignaz Kaup, “Was kosten die minderwertigen Elemente dem Staat und der Gesellschaft?” Archiv für Rassen-und Gesellschaftsbiologie 10 (1913): 747.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hans Kurella, “Soziale Anthropologie,” Zukunft 12 (1895): 312–14.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Alfred Ploetz, “Die Begriffe Rasse und Gesellschaft und einige zusammenhängende Probleme,” Verhandlungen des Ersten Deutschen Soziologentages 1 (1911): 146–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Heinz Potthoff, “Schutz der Schwachen?” Archiv für Rassen-und Gesellschaftsbiologie 8 (1911): 89–90.

    Google Scholar 

  21. August Forel, “Vom Neomalthusianismus,” Mutterschutz 1 (1905): 479.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wilhelm Schallmayer, “Rassedienst,” Menschheitsziele 3 (1909): 296.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2004 Richard Weikart

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weikart, R. (2004). The Specter of Inferiority: Devaluing the Disabled and “Unproductive”. In: From Darwin to Hitler. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10986-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10986-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-7201-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-10986-6

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics