Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Queenship and Power ((QAP))

Abstract

Anne Boleyn, the second consort of Henry VIII, holds a controversial place in historical accounts and dramatic representations largely because her marriage to Henry VIII ushered in the English Reformation. Scholars agree that the king withdrew from the Roman Catholic communion because Pope Clement VII refused to annul his marriage with Catherine of Aragon, the aunt of Emperor Charles V Henry sought an annulment on the grounds that his union with Catherine, his brother’s widow, which he claimed violated divine law, was the cause of the deaths of their male infants. Henry secretly wed the pregnant Anne in January 1533; that spring, by authority of the recently passed Statute of Appeals, Thomas Cranmer, archbishop of Canterbury, annulled the king’s first marriage and validated the second one. In June, Anne was crowned queen and in September her daughter Elizabeth was born. Less than three years later, in January 1536, she miscarried a male fetus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. E. W. Ives, Anne Boleyn (Oxford: Blackwell, 1968), pp. 49–52, 87, 358–82;

    Google Scholar 

  2. Retha M. Warnicke, The Rise and Fall of Anne Boleyn: Family Politics at the Court of Henry VIII (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 191–233.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See also Warnicke, “Conflicting Rhetoric About Tudor Women: The Example of Queen Anne Boleyn,” in Political Rhetoric, Power, and Renaissance Women, ed. Carole Levin and Patricia A. Sullivan (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1995), pp. 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Agnes Strickland, Lives of the Queens of England (London: Henry Colburn, 1842), 4:157.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For citations and his sources, see the Arden Edition of the Works of William Shakespeare, King Henry Mil, ed. R. A. Foakes, 3rd edn. (Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  6. For the controversy over the plays authorship, see G. R. Proudfoot, “Henry VIII (All is True),” in Shakespeare: A Bibliographical Guide, new edn. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990), pp. 381–83;

    Google Scholar 

  7. and Hugh M. Richmond, “The Resurrection of an Expired Form,” in Shakespeares English Histories: A Quest for Form and Genre, ed. John W. Velz (Binghamton, N.Y.: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1996, pp. 205–27; John Foxe, The Ecclesiastical History: Containing the Acts and Monuments (London: John Day, 1563);

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas S. Freeman, “Research, Rumour, and Propaganda: Anne Boleyn in Foxes ‘Book of Martyrs,’” Historical Journal, 38 (1995), pp. 797–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. John Banks, Vertue Betray’d: Or, Anna Bullen, ed. Diane Dreher (Los Angeles: for the William Andrews Clark Memorial Library by the University of California Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Two Librettos also appeared: Gaetano Donizetti, Anna Bolean: Libretto. English and Italian (New York: Snowden, 1850); and Conway Edwardes, Anne Boleyn: An Original Historical Burlesque Extravaganza (London: S. French, 187?).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Henry M. Grover, Anne Boleyn: A Tragedy (London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green, 1826); Tom Taylor, “Anne Boleyn: An Original Historical Play in Five Acts,” in Historical Dramas (London: Chatto and Windus, 1877), pp. 343–414.

    Google Scholar 

  12. George H. Boker, “Anne Boleyn,” in Plays and Poems (New York: AMC Press Reprint, 1967), pp. 115–236.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Robin Winks, The Historian as Detective: Essays on Evidence (New York: Harper & Row, 1968), p. 229. For the quotation,

    Google Scholar 

  14. see Ira Bruce Nadel, Biography, Fiction, Fact, and Form (London: Macmillan, 1984), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nicholas Sander, Rise and Growth of the Anglican Schism, ed. David Lewis (London: Burns and Oates, 1877), p. 25;

    Google Scholar 

  16. Paul Friedmann, Anne Boleyn: A Chapter of English History 1527–1536 (London: MacMillan, 1884), especially vol. 2; Calendar of Letters, Despatches, and State Papers, Relating to the Negotiations Between England and Spain, ed. G. A. Bergenroth, P. de Gayangos, G. Mattingly, M. A. S. Hume, and R. Taylor (New York: Kraus Reprint, 1969), especially vols. 3, 4, 5 (hereafter CSP Span).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lajos Biro and Arthur Wimperis, The Private Life of Henry VIII, ed. Ernest Betts (London: Methuen & Co., 1934), scene 48;

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maxwell Anderson, Anne of the Thousand Days (New York: W Sloane Assoc, 1948);

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rosemary Anne Sisson, “Catherine of Aragon,” and Nick McCarty, “Anne Boleyn” in The Six Wives of Henry VIII, ed. J. C. Trewin (New York: Frederick Ungar Company, 1971), pp. 1–186.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Linda McJ. Micheli, “‘Sit By Us:’ Visual Imagery and the Two Queens in Henry VIIIShakespeare Quarterly, 38 (1987), pp. 452–66;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim H. Noling, “Grubbing Up the Stock: Dramatizing Queens in Henry VIIIShakespeare Quarterly, 39 (1988), pp. 291–306; Jo Eldridge Carney, “Queenship in Shakespeare’s Henry VIII: The Issue of Issue,” in Political Rhetoric, ed. Levin and Sullivan, pp. 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Like Noling, I disagree with Hugh M. Richmond, “The Feminism of Shakespeare’s Henry VIIIEssays in Literature, 6 (1979), pp. 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hugh Richmond, Shakespeare in Performance: King Henry VIII (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1994), p. 5; however, Micheli, “Sit By Us,” pp. 454–57, notes that Anne was compliant.

    Google Scholar 

  24. My thanks to John Watson, University of Minnesota, for the reference to Joan DeJean, Tender Geographies: Origins of the Novel in France (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991), pp. 127–28, 158, 184.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Winston Tolles, Tom Taylor and Victorian Drama (New York: Colorado University Press, 1940), pp. 220, 238. This was the only time it was performed. Adelaide Neilson played Anne, Miss Carlisle, Jane Seymour, and Charles Harcourt, Henry VIII.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Oliver H. Evans, George Henry Boker (Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1984), pp. 37–38;

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thomas M. Kitts, The Theatrical Life of George Henry Boker: 1823–1890 (New York: Peter Land, 1994), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Barbara Lee Horn, Maxwell Anderson: A Research and Production Sourcebook (Westport, CT.: Greenwood Press, 1996), pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Carole Levin Jo Eldridge Carney Debra Barrett-Graves

Copyright information

© 2003 Carole Levin, Jo Eldridge Carney, Debra Barrett-Graves

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Warnicke, R.M. (2003). Anne Boleyn in History, Drama, and Film. In: Levin, C., Carney, J.E., Barrett-Graves, D. (eds) “High and Mighty Queens” of Early Modern England: Realities and Representations. Queenship and Power. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10676-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10676-6_15

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-230-62118-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-10676-6

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics