Skip to main content

Abstract

Until very recently, and particularly in the United States, the field of military geography has remained mostly stunted and neglected. Indeed, in reviewing the massive compilations of newspaper articles, magazine and journal articles (including particularly those from the specialized military journals produced by the war colleges and services), and full-length books on Third World warfare, one may only rarely obtain a detailed, vivid picture, a “feel,” for what is happening on the ground. Maps are not usually provided, and when they are, they are usually on a full-country or regional scale, “flat” maps devoid of attention to terrain or vegetation, providing little more than the location of cities, major rivers, and national boundaries. One obtains therefrom little sense of the relevant topography, particularly as pertains to the tactical or operational levels of warfare. The military implications of the weather and the seasons are noted only sporadically, cursorily. With much greater frequency, reporters and academic military analysts focus on weapons (and the arms trade by which they are acquired), in a manner almost ignoring their important relationship to the terrain and the weather. One gets technological determinism in a geographical vacuum. Or at least that was the case before the massive attention paid to the 1990–91 U.S. buildup in the Persian Gulf area and the actual war in 1991, which focused attention on the terrain and weather aspects of warfare in a manner not before seen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Geography 89/90, 4th ed., ed. Gerald R. Pitzl (Guildford, CT: Dushkin, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. John M. Collins, Military Geography for Professionals and the Public (Washington: Brassey’s, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  3. United States Military Academy, A Bibliography of Military Geography, vols. 1–4 (West Point, NY: U.S. Military Academy, circa 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hugh Faringdon, Confrontation: The Strategic Geography of NATO and the Warsaw Pact (New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Patrick O’Sullivan, Terrain and Tactics (New York: Greenwood Press, 1991);

    Google Scholar 

  6. Patrick O’Sullivan and Jesse W. Miller, The Geography of Warfare (London: Croom Helm, 1983);

    Google Scholar 

  7. and O’Sullivan, “A Geographical Analysis of Guerilla Warfare,” Political Geography Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 2 (1983), pp. 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. See also earlier, Louis C. Peltier and E. Etzel Pearcy, Military Geography (Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roger E. Kasperson and Julian Minghi, eds., The Structure of Political Geography (Chicago: Aldine, 1969);

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dennis Rumley and Julian Minghi, The Geography of Border Landscapes (New York: Rout-ledge and Keegan Paul, 1991);

    Google Scholar 

  11. and Arnon Sofer and Y. Bar Gal, Geographical Changes in the Traditional Arab Villages in Northern Israel (Durham, U.K.: University of Durham, Center for Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Anthony Cordesman and Abraham Wagner, The Lessons of Modern War, vol. 3 (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1990), pp. 1–237.

    Google Scholar 

  13. John Keegan and Andrew Wheatcroft, Zones of Conflict: An Atlas of Future Wars (London: Jonathan Cape, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Patrick O’Sullivan, “The Geography of Wars in the Third World,” in Stephanie G. Neuman and Robert E. Harkavy, The Lessons of Recent Wars in the Third World: Comparative Dimensions, vol. 2 (Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, 1987), p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harold M. Forde, “An Introduction to Military Geography,” Military Review, vol. 28, no. 11 (February 1949), pp. 26–36 and (March 1949), pp. 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maj. James E. Wilson, Jr., “The Fourth Dimension of Terrain,” Military Review, vol. 26, no. 6 (September 1946), pp. 49–55 (49).

    Google Scholar 

  17. André Gimond, “Desert Warfare,” Military Review, vol. 28, no. 5 (August 1948), pp. 73–83 (73).

    Google Scholar 

  18. General D. Palit, The Lightning Campaign, p. 77. See also Shirin Tahir-Kheli, “Defense Planning in Pakistan,” in Stephanie G. Neuman, ed., Defense Planning in Less-Industrialized States (Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, 1984), chapter 7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. The military aspects of Israel’s strategic depth problem on the Golan Heights is illustrated, in an analysis of the tank warfare in 1973, in Avigdor Kahalani, The Heights of Courage: A Tank Leader’s War on the Golan (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Strategic depth in the Arab-Israeli context is discussed in Geoffrey Kemp and Robert E. Harkavy, Strategic Geography and the Changing Middle East (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1997), pp. 163–164.

    Google Scholar 

  21. For a general treatment, see Stephanie G. Neuman, Military Assistance in Recent Wars: The Dominance of the Superpowers (New York: Praeger, 1986);

    Google Scholar 

  22. and Michael Brzoska and Frederic Pearson, Arms and Warfare: Escalation, De-Escalation and Negotiation (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Such natural barriers as an element of power are discussed in A. F. K. Organski, World Politics (New York: Alfred Knopf, 1958), pp. 126–127.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See, in particular, Anthony H. Cordesman and Abraham Wagner, The Lessons of Modern War: The Iran-Iraq War, vol. II (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1990), esp. pp. 70–74.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Anthony H. Cordesman and Abraham Wagner, The Lessons of Modern War, vol. I (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1990), esp. pp. 122–125.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See Robert Harkavy, Preemption and Two-Front Conventional Warfare: A Comparison of 1967 Israeli Strategy with the Pre-World War I German Schließen Plan, Leonard Davis Institute, Hebrew University, Jerusalem Papers on Peace Problems, no. 23 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  27. The basics of the Schlieffen Plan are rendered in Barbara Tuchman, The Guns of August (New York: Dell, 1962), esp. chapters 2–7;

    Google Scholar 

  28. and Gerhard Ritter, The Schlieffen Plan (London: Oswald Wolff, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  29. See also Jack Snyder, The Ideology of the Offensive (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  30. This thesis is propounded in G. D. Sheffield, Blitzkrieg and Attrition: Land Operations in Europe, 1914–1945, in Colin McInnes and G. D. Sheffield, eds., Warfare in the Twentieth Century: Theory and Practice (London: Unwin, Hyman, 1988), chapter 3. Hence, on p. 51: “So deeply rooted is this belief that the world wars represent two distinct types of war and areas of generalship that the official biographer of Field-Marshal Montgomery regarded it as a slur upon his subject that the undeniably attritional battle of Alamein should be seen as being ‘in the mold of World War I.’ This chapter argues that this interpretation is misguided and that continuity, not change, was the hallmark of warfare at the tactical and operational levels during the period under examination, and further that it was the First World War, not the Second, that was the main period of innovation.”

    Google Scholar 

  31. Van Creveld, Military Lessons of the Yom Kippur War, and for a later interpretation, Edward Luttwak and Dan Horowitz, The Israeli Army (Harper and Row, 1975), chapter 10.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Overall, the role of U.S. airpower in the Gulf War and the question of its decisiveness is discussed in Edward Luttwak, “The Gulf War in its Purely Military Dimension,” in John O’Loughlin, Tom Mayer, and Edward S. Greenberg, eds., War and Its Consequences: Lessons from the Persian Gulf Conflict (New York: HarperCollins, 1994), pp. 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  33. In greater, indeed massive, detail, see also che Pentagon’s Gulf War Airpower Survey, directed by Eliot A. Cohen (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1993), six volumes (hereinafter called GWAPS).

    Google Scholar 

  34. The Pentagon Report, p. XXIV and pp. 354–356; and James F. Dunnigan and Austin Bay, From Shield to Storm (New York: William Morrow, 1992), pp. 306 and 445.

    Google Scholar 

  35. The point is made in Robert Taber, The War of the Flea: A Study of Guerrilla Warfare (New York: Lyle Stuart, 1965), pp. 129–130.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2001 Robert E. Harkavy and Stephanie G. Neuman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harkavy, R.E., Neuman, S.G. (2001). Military Geography. In: Warfare and the Third World. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07926-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics