Abstract
The grounding problem is, generally speaking, the problem of how to embed an artificial agent into its environment such that its behaviour, as well as the mechanisms, representations, etc. underlying it, can be intrinsic and meaningful to the agent itself, rather than dependent on an external designer or observer. This paper briefly reviews Searle’s and Harnad’s analyses of the grounding problem, and then evaluates cognitivist and enactive approaches to overcoming it. It is argued that, although these two categories of approaches differ in their nature and the problems they have to face, both, so far, fall short of solving the grounding problem for similar reasons. Further it is concluded that the reason the problem is still somewhat underestimated lies in the fact that modern situated and embodied AI, despite its emphasis of agent-environment interaction, still fails to fully acknowledge the historically rooted integrated nature of living organisms and their environmental embedding.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agre, P. E. & Chapman (1987) Pengi: An Implementation of a Theory of Activity. Proceedings of AAAI-87. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI, pp. 268–272.
Beer, R. D. (1995) A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction. Artificial Intelligence 72: 173–215.
Beer, R. A. (1996) Toward the Evolution of Dynamical Neural Networks for Minimally Cognitive Behaviour. In: Maes, P., Mataric, M., Meyer, J. A., Pollack J. & Wilson, S. (eds.) From Animals to Animals 4. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 421–429.
Bickhard, M. & Terveen, L. (1995) Foundational Issues in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science. Impasse and Solution. New York: Elsevier.
Biro, Z. & Ziemke, T. (1998) Evolution of visually-guided approach behaviour in recurrent artificial neural network robot controllers. In: Pfeifer, R., Blumberg, B. Meyer, J.-A. & Wilson, S. W (eds.) From Animals to Animats 5. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 73–76.
Brooks, R. A. (1986) A Robust Layered Control System for a Mobile Robot. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation 2: 14–23.
Brooks, R. A. (1989) A Robot that Walks: Emergent Behavior from a Carefully Evolved Network. Neural Computation 1(2): 253–262.
Brooks, R. A. (1990) Elephants Don’t Play Chess. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 6(1–2): 1–16.
Brooks, R. A. (1991a) Intelligence Without Representation. Artificial Intelligence 47: 139–160.
Brooks, R. A. (1991b) Intelligence Without Reason. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-91). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kauffmann, pp. 569–595.
Brooks, R. A. (1993) The Engineering of Physical Grounding. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 153–154.
Chalmers, D. J. (1992) Subsymbolic computation and the Chinese room. In: Dinsmore, J. (ed.) The Symbolic and Connectionist Paradigms: Closing the Gap. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Chiel, H. J. & Beer, R. A. (1997) The brain has a body: Adaptive Behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body, and environment. Trends in Neurosciences 20:553–557.
Clark, A. (1997) Being There. Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, A. & Wheeler, M. (1998) Bringing Representation Back to Life. In: Pfeifer, R., Blumberg, B. Meyer, J.-A. & Wilson, S. W (eds.) From Animals to Animats 5. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 3–12.
Cliff, D. & Miller, G. F. (1996) Co-evolution of Pursuit and Evasion II: Simulation Methods and Results. In: Maes, P., Mataric, M., Meyer, J.-A., Pollack J. & Wilson, S. (eds.) From Animals to Animats 4. Proceedings of the Fourth International. Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 506–515.
Cottrell, G. W., Bartell, B. & Haupt, C. (1990) Grounding Meaning in Perception. Proceedings of the German Workshop on Artificial Intelligence (GWAI), pp. 307–321.
Dorffner, G. & Prem, E. (1993) Connectionism, Symbol Grounding, and Autonomous Agents. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 144–148.
Floreano, D. (1997) Reducing Human Design and Increasing Adaptability in Evolutionary Robotics. In: Gomi, T. (ed.) Evolutionary Robotics. From Intelligent Robots to Artificial Life. Kanata, Canada: AAI Books.
Fodor, J. A. (1980) Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 63–110.
Fodor, J. A. (1981) Representations: philosophical essays on the foundations of cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. A. (1983) The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. A. & Pylyshyn, Z. (1988) Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition 28:3–71.
Funes, P. & Pollack, J. B. (1997) Computer evolution of buildable objects. In: Husbands, P. & Harvey, I. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 358–367.
Globus, G. G. (1992) Toward a Noncomputational Cognitive Neuroscience. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 4(4):299–310.
Gruau, F. (1995) Automatic definition of modular neural networks. Adaptive Behavior 2: 151–183.
Harnad, S. (1989) Minds, machines and Searle. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 1: 5–25.
Harnad, S. (1990) The Symbol Grounding Problem. Physica D 42: 335–346.
Harnad, S. (1993) Symbol Grounding is an Empirical Problem: Neural Nets are Just a Candidate Component. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 169–174.
Harnad, S. (1995) Grounding Symbolic Capacity in Robotic Capacity. In: Steels, L. & Brooks, R. A. (eds.) The “artificial life” route to “artificial intelligence”. Building Situated Embodied Agents. New Haven: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 276–286.
Lakoff, G. (1993) Grounded Concepts Without Symbols. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 161–164.
Law, D. and Miikkulainen, R. (1994) Grounding Robotic Control with Genetic Neural Networks. Tech. Rep. AI94-223. Austin: Dept. of Computer Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin.
Loeb, J. (1918) Forced movements, tropisms, and animal conduct. Philadelphia: Lippincott Company.
Lund, H. H.; Hallam, J. & Lee, W. (1997) Evolving robot morphology. Proceedings of the IEEE Fourth International Conference on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE Press.
Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (1987) The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Boston, MA: Shambhala.
Mondada, F. & Floreano, D. (1995) Evolution of neural control structures: Some experiments on mobile robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 16(2–4):183–196.
Newell, A. (1980) Physical Symbol Systems. Cognitive Science A: 135-183.
Newell, A. & Simon, H. (1976) Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search. Communications of the ACM 19: 113–126.
Nolfi, S. (1997a) Using emergent modularity to develop control systems for mobile robots. Adaptive Behavior 5(3): 343–363.
Nolfi, S. (1997b) Evolving Non-Trivial Behavior on Autonomous Robots: Adaptation is More Powerful Than Decomposition and Integration. In: Gomi, T. (ed.) Evolutionary Robotics. From Intelligent Robots to Artificial Life. Kanata, Canada: AAI Books.
Peschl, M. F. (1996) The Representational Relation Between Environmental Structures and Neural Systems: Autonomy and Environmental Dependency in Neural Knowledge Representation. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Sciences 1 (3).
Pfeifer, R. (1995) Cognition. Perspectives from autonomous agents. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 15: 47–70.
Pfeifer, R. & Scheier, C. (1998) Understanding Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Port, R. & van Gelder, T. (1995) Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Regier, T. (1992) The Acquisition of Lexical Semantics for Spatial Terms: A Connectionist Model of Perceptual Categorization. PhD Thesis / Tech. Rep. TR-92-062. Berkeley: Dept. of Computer Science, University of California at Berkeley.
Roeder, K. & Treat, A. (1957) Ultrasonic reception by the tympanic organs of noctoid moths. Journal of Experimental Zoology 134:127–158.
Rutkowska, J. C. (1996) Reassessing Piaget’s Theory of Sensorimotor Intelligence: A View from Cognitive Science. In: Bremner, J. G. (ed.) Infant Development: Recent Advances. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rylatt, M. & Czarnecki, C. (1998) Beyond Physical Grounding and Naive Time: Investigations into Short-Term Memory. In: Pfeifer, R., Blumberg, B., Meyer, J.-A. & Wilson, S. W (eds.) From Animals to Animats 5. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 22–31.
Schank, R. C. & Abelson, R. P. (1977) Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Searle, J. (1980) Minds, brains and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 417–457.
Sharkey, N. E. (1997) Neural networks for coordination and control: The portability of experiential representations. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 22(3–4): 345–359.
Sharkey, N. E. & Heemskerk, J. H. (1997) The Neural Mind and the Robot. In: Browne, A. J. (Ed.) Neural Perspectives on Cognition and Adaptive Robotics. Bristol, UK: IOP Press.
Sharkey, N. E. & Jackson, S. A. (1994) Three Horns of the Representational Trilemma. In: Honavar, V. & Uhr, L. (eds.) Symbol Processing and Connectionist Models for Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Modeling: Steps towards Integration. Academic Press, pp. 155–189.
Sharkey, N. E. & Jackson, S. A. (1996) Grounding Computational Engines. Artificial Intelligence Review 10:65–82.
Sharkey, N. E. & Ziemke, T. (1998) A consideration of the biological and psychological foundations of autonomous robotics. Connection Science 10(3–4): 361–391.
Sherrington, C. S. (1906) The integrative action of the nervous system. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.
Tani, J. (1996) Does Dynamics Solve the Symbol Grounding Problem of Robots? An Experiment in Navigation Learning. Learning in Robots and Animals. Working Notes. AISB’96 workshop, Brighton, UK.
van Gelder, T.J. (1995) What might cognition be if not computation? Journal of Philosophy 91: 345–381.
van Gelder, T.J. (1998) The Dynamical Hypothesis in Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Varela, E, Thompson, E. & Rosch, E. (1991) The Embodied Mind. Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
von Uexküll, J. (1928) Theoretische Biologie. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Wilson, S. W. (1991) The Animat Path to AI. From Animals to Animats: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ziemke, T. (1996a) Towards Adaptive Behaviour System Integration using Connectionist Infinite State Automata. In: Maes, P., Mataric, M., Meyer, J.-A., Pollack J. & Wilson, S. (eds.) From Animals to Animats 4. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 145–154.
Ziemke, T. (1996b) Towards Autonomous Robot Control via Self-Adapting Recurrent Networks. Artificial Neural Networks ICANN 96. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag, pp. 611–616.
Ziemke, T. (1996c) Towards Adaptive Perception in Autonomous Robots using Second-Order Recurrent Networks. Proceedings of the First Euromicro Workshop on Advanced Mobile Robots (EUROBOT’ 96). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 89–98.
Ziemke, T. (1997) The ‘Environmental Puppeteer’ Revisited: A Connectionist Perspective on ‘Autonomy’. Proceedings of the 6th European Workshop on Learning Robots (EWLR-6). Brighton, UK, August 1997.
Ziemke, T. (1998) Adaptive Behavior in Autonomous Agents. Presence 7(6):564–587.
Ziemke, T. & Sharkey, N. E. (eds.) (1998) Biorobotics. Special issue of Connection Science 10(3–4).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ziemke, T. (1999). Rethinking Grounding. In: Riegler, A., Peschl, M., von Stein, A. (eds) Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-29605-0_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-29605-0_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46286-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-585-29605-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive