The purpose of this chapter is to examine the process of mental model construction while reading science text. This is done by bringing together three research traditions: conceptual change, text comprehension, and eye-tracking re- search. The results of our experimental pilot study show the usefulness of the eyetracking methodology in conceptual change research. This line of study can be beneficial for developing science texts and other learning materials.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anto, E., & Penttinen, M. (2006). Kognitiivinen konflikti ja silmänliikkeet oppikirjatekstin lukemisprosessissa. [Cognitive conflict and eye movements in reading textbook text.] Master’s Thesis, University of Turku, Department of Teacher Education.
Anto, E., Penttinen, M., & Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. (in press). Käsitteellinen muutos jasilmänliikkeet tekstiymmärtämisprosessissa. [Conceptual change and eye movements in text comprehension process.] Psykologia.
Alvermann, D.E., & Hague, S.A. (1989). Comprehension of counterintuitive science text: Effects of prior knowledge and text structure. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 197-202.
Armand, F. (2001). Learning from expository texts: effects of the interaction of prior knowledge and text structure on responses to different question types. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16, 67-86.
Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Chann, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 1-40.
diSessa, A.A. (2006). A history of conceptual change research. Threads and fault lines. In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 265-281). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D.F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 671-688.
Gilabert, R., Martinez, G., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2005). Some good texts are always better: Text revision to foster inferences of readers with high and low prior background knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 15, 45-68.
Guzzetti, B.J., Snyder, T.S., Glass, G.V., & Gamas, W.S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 117-159.
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1997). Qualitative changes in intuitive biology. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12, 111-130.
Hewson, P.W. (1981). A conceptual change approach to learning science. European Journal of Science Education, 3, 383-396.
Hynd, C.R. (2001). Refutational texts and the change process. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 699-714.
Hynd, C., & Alvermann, D.E. (1986). The role of refutation text in overcoming difficulty with science concepts. Journal of Reading, 29, 440-446.
Hynd, C., Holschuh, J., & Sherrie, N. (2000). Learning complex scientific information: motivation theory and its relation to student perceptions. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16 (1), 23-57.
Hyönä, J. (1998). Lukeminen havaintoprosessina. [Reading as a perceptual process.] Psykologia, 4-5, 276-282.
Hyönä, J., Kaakinen, J.K., & Lorch, R.F. Jr. (2002). Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: Evidence from eye fixation patterns. Journal of Education Psychology, 94, 44-55.
Hyönä, J., Lorch, R.F. Jr & Rinck, M. (2003). Eye movement measures to study global text processing. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 313-334). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 4, 71-115.
Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kaakinen, J. (2004). Perspective effects on text comprehension: Evidence from recall, eyetracking and think-alouds. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, ser. B, tom. 275.
Kaakinen, J., Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2004). Lukijoiden silmänliiketutkimus. Sanojen tunnistamisesta tekstinymmärtämisstrategioihin. [Eye tracking research of readers. From word recognition to text comprehension strategies.] Psykologia, 2, 92-103.
Kang, S., Scharmann, L.C., & Noh, T. (2004). Reexamining the role of cognitive conflict in science concept learning. Research in Science Education, 34, 71-96.
Kintsch, W. (1986). Learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 3 (2), 87-108.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A constructionintegration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
Limón, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11, 357-380.
Limón, M., & Mason, L. (2002). Introduction. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change. Issues in theory and practice (pp. 15-20). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Mandl, H., & Schnotz, W. (1987). New directions in text processing. In E. De Corte, H.G.L.C. Lodewijks, R. Parmentier & P. Span (Eds.), Learning and instruction. European research in an international context: Vol. 1 (pp. 321-338). Leuven/Oxford: Leuven University Press/Pergamon Press.
Mason, L. (1994). Analogy, metaconceptual awareness and conceptual change. A classroom study. Educational Studies, 20 (2), 267-291.
Mason, L. (2001). Introduction. In L. Mason (Ed.), Instructional practices for conceptual change in science domains. Learning and Instruction, 11 (4-5), 259-262.
Mayer, R.E. (2002). Understanding conceptual change: A commentary. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change. Issues in theory and practice (pp. 101-111). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
McNamara, D.S., Kintsch, E., Butler Songer, N. & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, backround knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1-43
Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. (2002). Textbook text as a tool for promoting conceptual change in science. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, ser. B, tom. 249.
Mikkilä-Erdmann, M., Anto, E., & Penttinen M. (2006). Learning from science text - Eye movement measurement as a method for investigating science text comprehension. Poster presentation. In Proceedings of EARLI SIG 2 2006, August-September 2006.
Mikkilä-Erdmann, M., & Lepola, J. (2004). Responsiveness vs. resistance to conceptual change concerning photosynthesis. Paper presented at EARLI Conceptual Change SIG meeting. Delphi, Greece, May 2004.
Olkinuora, E., & Salonen, P. (1992). Adaptation, motivational orientation, and cognition in a subnormally performing child: a systemic perspective for training. In B.Y.L. Wong (Ed.), Contemporary intervention research in learning disabilities. An international perspective (pp. 190-213). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
Roth, K. (1990). Developing meaningful conceptual understanding in science. In B. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 139-175). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schnotz, W. (1993). Brief research report. Adaptive construction of mental representations in understanding expository texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 114-120.
Schnotz, W., & Preuss, A. (1997). Task-dependent construction of mental models as a basis for conceptual change. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12, 185-211.
Seel, N.M. (2004). Model-centered learning environments: Theory, instructional design, and effects. In N.M. Seel & S. Dijkstra (Eds.), Curriculum, plans, and processes in instructional design. International perspectives (pp. 49-74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Siegler, R.S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children’s thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sinatra, G.M. (2002). Motivational, social, and contextual aspects of conceptual change: a commentary. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change. Issues in theory and practice (pp. 187-197). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sinatra, G.M., & Mason, L. (in press). Beyond knowledge: learner characteristics influencing conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Handbook on conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sinatra, G.M., & Pintrich, P.R. (2003). The role of intentions in conceptual change. In G.M. Sinatra, & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 1-18). Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Smith, J.P., diSessa, A.A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3 (2), 115-163.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312.
van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Vosniadou, S. (1994a). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45-69.
Vosniadou, S. (1994b). Introduction. Learning and Instruction, 4, 3-6.
Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W.F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585.
Vosniadou, S., & Ioannides, C. (1998). From conceptual development to science education: A psychological point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (10), 1213-1230.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
White, R.T., & Gunstone, R.F. (1989). Metalearning and conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 11, special issue, 577-586.
White, R.T. (1994). Conceptual and conceptional change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 117-121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mikkilä-Erdmann, M., Penttinen, M., Anto, E., Olkinuora, E. (2008). Constructing Mental Models during Learning from Science Text. In: Ifenthaler, D., Pirnay-Dummer, P., Spector, J.M. (eds) Understanding Models for Learning and Instruction. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76898-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76898-4_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-76897-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-76898-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)