Public Choice has been defined as the application of the methodology of economics to the study of politics. This definition suggests that public choice is an inherently interdisciplinary field, and so it is. Depending upon which person one selects as making the pioneering contribution to public choice, it came into existence either in the late 18th century as an offshoot of mathematics, or in the late 1940s as an offshoot of economics. The case for the earlier date rests on the existence of publications by two French mathematicians, J.C. de Borda (1781) and M. de Condorcet (1785). Condorcet was the first person, as far as we know, to discover the problem of cycling, the possibility when using the simple majority rule that an alternative x can lose to y in a vote between the two, y can lose to another alternative z, but z will also lose to x. The existence of such a possibility obviously raises the issue of how a community can decide among these three alternatives, when a cycle exists, and what the normative justification for any choice made will be. No cycle exists, of course, if some alternative, say y, can defeat both x and z. The literature has commemorated Condorcet’s contribution by naming such an issue like y a Condorcet winner. A vast number of papers and books have analyzed both the normative and positive implications of the existence of cycles.
This chapter is a revised and updated version of an essay that first appeared in The Encyclopedia of Public Choice edited by Charles K. Rowley and Friedrich Schneider and published in 2004 by Kluwer Academic Publishers, Volume 1, pp. 32–48.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Lesina, A. and Spolaore, E. (2003). The Size of Nations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Alt, J. E. (1999). “Obituary: Thoughts on Mancur Olson’s contribution to political science.” Public Choice, 98: 1-4.
Arrow, K. J. (1950). “A difficulty in the concept of social welfare.” Journal of Political Economy, 58: 328-346.
Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley.
Black, D. (1948a). “On the rationale of group decision making.” Journal of Political Economy, 56: 23-34; reprinted in K.J. Arrow and T. Scitovsky (eds.) (1969) 133-146.
Black, D. (1948b). “The decisions of a committee using a special majority.” Econometrica, 16: 245-261.
Black, D. (1958). The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blankart, C. B. and D. C. Mueller. (eds.) (2004). A constitution for the European Union. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press (CESifo Seminar Series).
Bowen, H. R. (1943). “The interpretation of voting in the allocation of economic resources.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 58: 27-48.
Breton, A. (1996). Competitive Governments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buchanan, J. M. (1949). “The pure theory of government finance: A suggested approach.” Journal of Political Economy, 57: 496-506.
Buchanan, J. M. and Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of Consent. Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Clarke, E. H. (1971). “Multipart pricing of public goods.” Public Choice 11: 17-33.
Cooter, R. D. (2000). The strategic constitution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Coughlin, P. and Nitzan, S. (1981a). “Electoral outcomes with probabilistic voting and nash social welfare maxima.” Journal of Public Economics, 15: 113-122.
Coughlin, P. and Nitzan, S. (1981b). “Directional and local electoral equilibria with probabilistic voting.” Journal of Economic Theory, 24: 226-239.
de Borda, J. C. (1781). Memoire sur les Elections au Scrutin. Paris: Histoire de l’Academie Royale des Sciences.
de Condorcet, M. (1785). Essai sur l’Application de L’Analyse à la Probabilité des Décisions Rendues à la Pluraliste des Voix. Paris.
Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Drazen, A. (2000). Political Economy in Macroeconomics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ferejohn, J., Rakove, J. N., and Riley, J. (eds.). (2001). Constitutional Culture and Democratic Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Filippov, M., Ordeshook, P. C. and Shvetsova, O. (2004). Designing Federalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frey, B. S. and Schneider, F. (1978a). “An empirical study of politico- economic interaction in the U.S.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 60: 174-183.
Frey, B. S. and Schneider, F. (1978b). “A politico-economic model of the United Kingdom.” Economic Journal, 88: 243-253.
Frohlich, N. and Oppenheimer, J. A. (1992). Choosing Justice: An Experimental Approach to Ethical Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J. A., and Eavey, C. L. (1987). “Laboratory results on Rawls’s distributive justice.” British Journal of Political Science, 17: 1-21.
Gibbard, A. (1977). “Manipulation of schemes that combine voting with chance.” Econometrica, 45: 665-668.
Groves, T. (1973). “Incentives in teams.” Econometrica, 41: 617-631.
Groves, T. and Ledyard, J. J. (1977). “Optimal allocation of public goods: a solution to the ‘free rider’ problem.” Econometrica, 45: 783-809.
Hibbs, D. A., Jr. (1977). “Political parties and macroeconomic policy.” American Political Science Review, 71: 1467-1487.
Hibbs, D. A (1987). The Political Economy of Industrial Democracies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hoffman, E. (1997). “Public choice experiments,” in Mueller, D.C. (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 415-426.
Hoffman, E. and Spitzer, M. L. (1982). “The coase theorem: Some experimental tests.” Journal of Law and Economics, 25: 73-98.
Hotelling, H. (1929). “Stability in competition.” Economic Journal, 39: 41-57.
Hylland, A. and Zeckhauser, R. (1970). “A mechanism for selecting public goods when preferences must be elicited.” KSG Discussion Paper 70D, Harvard University.
Kramer, G. H. (1971). “Short run fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior, 1896-1964.” American Political Science Review, 65: 131-143.
Krueger, A. O. (1974). “The political economy of the rent-seeking society.” American Economic Economic Review, 64(3): 291-303; reprinted in Buchanan, J. M., Tollison, R. D., and Tullock, G. (eds.) (1980) 51-70.
Laver, M. and Schofield, N. (1990). Multiparty Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ledyard, J. O. (1984). “The pure theory of large two-candidate elections.” Public Choice, 44(1): 7-41.
Ledyard, J. O. (1995). “Public goods: a survey of experimental research,” in Kagel, J. H. and Roth, A. E. (eds.) The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 111-251.
MacRae, C. D. (1977). “A political model of the business cycle.” Journal of Political Economy, 85: 239-263.
Magee, S. P. (1997). “Endogenous protection: the empirical evidence,” in Mueller, D. C. (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 526-561.
Marwell, G. and Ames, R. E. (1979). “Experiments on the provision of public goods I: resources, interest, group size, and the free rider problem.” American Journal of Sociology, 84: 1335-1360.
Marwell, G. and Ames, R. E. (1980). “Experiments on the provision of public goods II: provision points, stakes, experience and the free rider problem.” American Journal of Sociology, 85: 926-937.
McKelvey, R. D. (1976). “Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control.” Journal of Economic Theory, 12: 472-482.
McKelvey, R. D. (1986). “Covering, dominance, and institution-free properties of social choice.” American Journal of Political Science, 30: 283-314.
Mill, J. S. (1861). Considerations on Representative Government. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1958.
Miller, N. R. (1980). “A new solution set for tournaments and majority voting: further graphtheoretical approaches to the theory of voting.” American Journal of Political Science, 24: 68-96.
Miller, N. R. (1983). “The covering relation in tournaments: Two corrections.” American Journal of Political Science, 27: 382-385.
Moe, T. M. (1997). “The positive theory of public bureaucracy,” in Mueller, D.C. (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 455-480.
Mueller, D. C. (1978). “Voting by veto.” Journal of Public Economics, 10: 57-75.
Mueller, D. C. (1984). “Voting by veto and majority rule.” in Horst, H. (ed.) Public Finance and the Quest for Efficiency. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, pp. 69-85.
Mueller, D. C. (1996). Constitutional Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Muller, W. C. and Kaare, S. (2000). “Coalition governance in Western Europe,” in Muller, W.C. and Strøm, K. (eds.) Coalition Governments in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 559-592.
Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: AldineAtherton.
Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). “The political business cycle.” Review of Economic Studies, 42: 169-190.
Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ostrom, E. and Walker, J. (1997). “Neither markets nor states: Linking transformation processes in collective action areas,” in Mueller, D. C. (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 35-72.
Paldam, M. (1997). “Political business cycles,” in Mueller, D. C. (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 342-370.
Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2000). Political Economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Persson, T and Tabellini, G. (2003). The Economic Effect of Constitions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Posner, R. A. (1975). “The social costs of monopoly and regulation.” Journal of Political Economy, 83: 807-827; reprinted in Buchanan, J. M., Tollison, R. D., and Tullock, G. (eds.) (1980)71-94.
Rawls, J. A. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Riker, W. H. (1962). The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Riker, W. H. (1982). Liberalism Against Populism. San Francisco: Freeman.
Samuelson, P. A. (1954). “The pure theory of public expenditure.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 36: 386-389.
Saari, D. G. (1994). Geometry of Voting. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.
Satterthwaite, M. A. (1975). “Strategy-proofness and arrow’s conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions.” Journal of Economic Theory, 10: 187-217.
Schofield, N. (1978). “Instability of simple dynamic games.” Review of Economic Studies, 45: 575-594.
Schofield, N. (1997). “Multiparty electoral politics,” in Mueller, D. C. (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 271-295.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 3rd edn, (1950) New York: Harper & Row.
Sen, A. (1970). “The impossibility of a paretian liberal.” Journal of Political Economy, 78: 152-157.
Sen, A. (1996). “Rights: Formulation and consequences.” Analyse & Kritik, 18: 153-170.
Smith, V. L. (1979). “An experimental comparison of three public good decision mechanisms.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 81(2): 198-215.
Taylor, M. J. and Herman, V. M. (1971). “Party systems and government stability.” American Political Science Review, 65: 28-37.
Tollison, R. D. (1997). “Rent seeking,” in Mueller, D. C. (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 506-525.
Tullock, G. (1967). “The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies and theft.” Western Economic Journal, 5: 224-232; reprinted in Buchanan, Tollison and Tullock (eds.) (1980) 39-50.
van Roozendaal, P. (1990). “Centre parties and coalition formations: A game theoretic approach.” European Journal of Political Research, 18: 325-348.
van Roozendaal, P. (1992). “The effect of dominant and central parties on cabinet composition and durability.” Legal Studies Quarterly, 17: 5-36.
van Roozendaal, P. (1993). “Cabinets in the Netherlands (1918-1990): The importance of ‘dominant’ and ‘central’ parties.” European Journal of Political Research, 23: 35-54.
Vickrey, W. (1961). “Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders.” Journal of Finance, 16: 8-37.
Voigt, S. (1997). “Positive constitutional economics - A survey.” Public Choice, 90: 11-53.
Young, H. P. (1997). “Group choice and individual judgements,” in Mueller, D. C. (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 201-225.
Wicksell, K. (1896). “Ein neues Prinzip der gerechten Besteuerung.” Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen, Jena; translated as “A New Principle of Just Taxation,” 1958; reprinted in (1967) Richard, A. M., and Peacock, A. T. (eds.) Classics in the Theory of Public Finance. London: Macmillan, pp. 72-118.
Wintrobe, R. (1997). “Modern bureaucratic theory,” in Mueller, D. C. (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 429-454.
Wittman, D. (1995). The Myth of Democratic Failure: Why Political Institutions are Efficient. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mueller, D.C. (2008). Public Choice: An Introduction. In: Readings in Public Choice and Constitutional Political Economy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75870-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75870-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-74574-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-75870-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)