Skip to main content

Abstract

Since the inception of the study of international trade, the most common modeling framework has been that of perfect competition and of general equilibrium. While the recent development of what has been called the ‘new trade theory’ has led to the analysis of trade issues in models involving imperfect competition, including monopolistic competition and oligopolistic competition, the perfectly competitive equilibrium framework continues to be a dominant force in international trade theory.

This chapter has benefited considerably from comments on earlier drafts by Daniel Bernhofen, Mauro Caselli, Xiao Chen, Christos Kotsogiannis and Mark Melatos. The research was financially supported by the Australian Research Council.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe, K. (1992) ‘Tariff reform in a small open economy with public production’, International Economic Review, 33(1), 209–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhofen, D.M. (2010) ‘The empirics of general equilibrium trade theory’, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. (1958) ‘Immiserizing growth: a geometric note’, Review of Economic Studies, 25, 201–05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, W.W. (1979) ‘Some theorems of trade and general equilibrium with many goods and factors’, Econometrica, 47(3), 709–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costinot A. (2009) ‘An elementary theory of comparative advantage’, Econometrica, 77(4), 1165–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D.R. (1995) ‘Intra-industry trade: A Heckscher-Ohlin-Ricardo approach’, Journal of International Economics, XXXIX, 201–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1959) Theory of Value. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, A.V. (1980) ‘The general validity of the Law of Comparative Advantage’, Journal of Political Economy, 88, 941–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1982) ‘The general validity of the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem’, American Economic Review, 72(4), 683–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W.E. (1971) ‘An application of the Shephard duality theorem: A generalized Leontief production function’, Journal of Political Economy, 79(3), 481–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W.E., A.H. Turunen-Red and A.D. Woodland (1989) ‘Productivity- and Pareto-improving changes in taxes and tariffs’, The Review of Economic Studies, 56(2), 199–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W.E., and A.D. Woodland (1977) ‘Frank Knight’s theorem in linear programming revisited’, Econometrica, 45(2), 375–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A.K., and V. Norman (1980) Theory of international trade: J. Nisbet/Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit A.K., and A.D. Woodland (1982) ‘The relationship between factor endowments and commodity trade’, Journal of International Economics, 13, 201–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A.K. (2010) ‘The integrated world equilibrium diagram from international trade theory’, in Blaug, Mark, and P.J. Lloyd (eds), Famous Figures and Diagrams in Economics, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch, R., S. Fischer and P. Samuelson (1977) ‘Comparative advantage, trade and payments in a Ricardian model with a continuum of goods’, American Economic Review, LXVII, 823–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1980) ‘Heckscher-Ohlin trade theory with a continuum of goods’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, XCV, 203–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J. (1987) ‘A dynamic specific-factors model of international trade’, Review of Economic Studies, 54(2), 325–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J., and S. Kortum (2002) ‘Technology, geography, and trade,’ Econometrica, 70, 1741–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethier, W. (1974) ‘Some of the theorems of international trade with many goods and factors’, Journal of International Economics, 4, 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1982) ‘The general role of factor intensity in the theorems of international trade,’ Economics Letters, 10(3–4), 337–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1984) ‘Higher dimensional issues in trade theory,’ in Handbook of International Economics, vol. 1, R.W. Jones and P.B. Kenen (eds). New York: Elsevier Science, 131–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R.W. (1965) ‘The structure of simple general equilibrium models’, The Journal of Political Economy, 73(6), 557–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R.W., and J. Scheinkman (1977) ‘The relevance of the two-sector production model in trade theory’, Journal of Political Economy, 85, 909–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, P.J., and A.G. Schweinberger (1988) ‘Trade expenditure functions and the gains from trade’, Journal of International Economics, 24, 275–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuyama, K. (2007) ‘Beyond icebergs: Towards a theory of biased globalization’, Review of Economic Studies, 74(1), 237–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2008) ‘Ricardian trade theory’, in L. Blume and S. Durlauf, (eds), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Ed. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, L.W. (1954) ‘Specialization and efficiency in world production’, Review of Economic Studies, 21(3), 165–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzler, L. (1949) ‘Tariffs, the terms of trade, and the distribution of the national income’, Journal of Political Economy, 57, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neary, P. (1978) ‘Short-run capital specificity and the pure theory of international trade’, Economic Journal, 88(351), 488–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romalis, J. (2004) ‘Factor proportions and the structure of commodity trade,’ American Economic Review, 14, 67–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffin, R. (1988) ‘The missing link: the Ricardian approach to the factor endowment Theory of Trade,’ American Economic Review, 78, 759–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rybczynski, T. (1955) ‘Factor endowment and relative commodity prices’, Economica, 22(84), 336–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A. (1953–54) ‘Prices of Factors and Goods in General Equilibrium’, Review of Economic Studies, 21, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, R.W. (1953) Cost and production functions Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolper, W.F., and P.A. Samuelson (1941) ‘Protection and real wages’, Review of Economic Studies, 9, 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uekawa, Y. (1971) ‘Generalization of the Stolper-Samuelson theorem’, Econometrica, 39(2), 197–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uekawa Y., Kemp, M.C. and L.L. Wegge (1973) ‘P- and PN-matrices, Minkowski- and Metzler-matrices, and generalizations of the Stolper-Samuelson and Samuelson-Rybczynski theorems’, Journal of International Economics, 3(1), 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C.A. (1980) ‘On the general structure of Ricardian models with a continuum of goods: applications to growth, tariff theory, and technical change’, Econometrica, 48(7), 1675–1702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodland, A.D. (1977) ‘A dual approach to equilibrium in the production sector in international trade theory’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 10(1), 50–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1980) ‘Direct and indirect trade utility functions’, Review of Economic Studies, 47(5), 907–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1982) International Trade and Resource Allocation, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2008) ‘Tradable and non-tradable commodities’ in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. 2nd Edition. S.N. Durlauf and L.E. Blume (eds) Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2010) ‘The factor price frontier’, Chapter 35 in Famous Figures and Diagrams in Economics, M. Blaug and P. Lloyd (eds) Edward Elgar Publishing Company, Cheltenham, UK, 262–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y. (1993) ‘A general model of comparative advantage with two factors and a continuum of goods’, International Economic Review, 34(2), 365–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Alan Woodland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Woodland, A. (2013). General Equilibrium Trade Theory. In: Bernhofen, D., Falvey, R., Greenaway, D., Kreickemeier, U. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of International Trade. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-30531-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics