Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in males and the second most common in females. Only 10–20% of patients are diagnosed at the early stage of disease. Recently, the role of novel biomarkers of the neoplastic process in the early detection of colorectal cancer has been widely discussed. In this review, we focused on the three novel biomarkers that are of potential clinical importance in diagnosing and monitoring colorectal cancer. Chitinase 3-like 1 protein, also known as YKL-40, and nestin and testin proteins are produced by colorectal cancer cells. YKL-40 protein is a marker of proliferation, differentiation, and tissue morphogenetic changes. The level of YKL-40 is elevated in about 20% of patients with colorectal cancer. An increased expression of nestin indicates immaturity. It is a marker of angiogenesis in neoplastic processes. Testin protein is a component of cell-cell connections and focal adhesions. The protein is produced in normal human tissues, but not in tumor tissues. Downregulation of testin increases cell motility, spread, and proliferation, and decreases apoptosis. The usefulness and role of these biomarkers, both alone and combined, in the diagnostics of colorectal cancer should be further explored as early cancer detection may substantially improve treatment outcome and patient survival.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Colorectal cancer significantly contributes to a reduction in life expectancy. According to data from the Global Burden of Disease Study, the number of deaths due to colorectal cancer has increased from 490,200 in 1990 to 771,100 in 2013, which is over a 57% increase (GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators 2015). Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in males and the second in females (Torre et al. 2015). The cancer constitutes a major health care and socioeconomic problem. In 2013, colon and rectum cancers ranked eight as the cause of years of life lost in the developed countries, including Poland. In European countries such as the Netherlands and Sweden, these cancers were classified as the fourth leading cause of years of life lost. A lower survival rate is observed in elderly patients and in those from certain geographical areas such as Eastern Europe (Holleczek et al. 2015), possibly due to poor and delayed diagnosis. At an early stage, colorectal cancer does not manifest specific signs and symptoms, so that it is often diagnosed in advanced stage. Maringe et al. (2013) have reported that only 10–20% of colorectal cancer patients are diagnosed when the cancer is in stage A of Duke’s classification (Duke 1932). The difference in survival between high- and low-income countries may be associated with different stages of the disease at the time of diagnosis in respective countries. Thus, the availability of reliable screening tools and biomarkers is of essential importance for the diagnostics and management of the disease. Recently, the role of novel biomarkers in the neoplastic process and early detection of colorectal cancer has been widely discussed (Corbo et al. 2017; Das et al. 2016). In this review we focused on three novel biomarkers that have been under scrutiny as being of potential clinical importance in colorectal cancer diagnosis and monitoring. These biomarkers are chitinase 3-like 1 protein, also known as YKL-40, and nestin and testin proteins; all produced by colorectal cancer cells.
2 Biomarkers and Risk Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer
An unhealthy diet, including consumption of processed meat products and alcohol, obesity, sedentary lifestyle, and smoking, can all contribute to the development of colorectal cancer (González et al. 2017; Friedenreich et al. 2016; Ferrari et al. 2007). Mitigating the effects of such modifiable risk factors may reduce the level of colorectal cancer morbidity (Johnson 2017; Doleman et al. 2016; Botteri et al. 2008). Patients at high risk are advised to participate in screening programs. Such programs are, however, of rather low sensitivity and specificity for the detection of colorectal cancer and for the avoidance of the cancer high invasiveness. Patients tend to avoid tests such as sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, despite the evidence of efficacy of these tests in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Therefore, the identification of new blood-derived biomarkers, which patients would be more complaint with, or noninvasive molecular tests would greatly benefit treatment outcome and survival.
The term tumor biomarker was coined in 1988 as a medical subject heading, and it was defined as “molecular products metabolized and secreted by neoplastic tissue and characterized biochemically in cells or body fluids”. Biomarkers are indicators of tumor stage and grade and are useful for monitoring the response to treatment and prognosticate recurrence. Biomarkers are represented by a host of molecules such hormones, antigens, amino acids, nucleic acids, enzymes, polyamines, and specific cell membrane proteins and lipids (Goossens et al. 2015).
Currently, there are only two protein biomarkers detectable in blood serum, which are approved for clinical use in colorectal cancer. The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is one of the two. Preoperative elevation of CEA is associated with reduced overall survival. A lack of postoperative normalization of CEA level may indicate an incomplete tumor resection and thus portends a recurrence. CEA monitoring helps identify patients with metastases, which particularly concerns the liver (Goldstein and Mitchell 2005; Duffy 2001). A disadvantage of CEA is that it lacks sensitivity in the early stages of colorectal cancer. It can also be increased in patients without cancer, being secreted in response to various inflammatory processes, e.g., hepatitis, inflammatory bowel disease, pancreatitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or oxidative stress in diabetic patients and smokers (Hasan and Mohieldein 2015; Tanaka et al. 2010; Fukuda et al. 1998).
Another biomarker widely used in colorectal cancer detection is fecal hemoglobin (f-Hb), which is usually detected using an immunochemical test. The test does not require dietary or medication restrictions. One or two stool samples are enough to conduct the test. The overall sensitivity and specificity of FIT in colorectal cancer is 79% and 94%, respectively, although these parameters may change due to inter-lab differences in cutoff values used for positive FIT results. The optimum cutoff value is still debatable (Lee et al. 2014; Tanaka et al. 2010). The use of FIT as a screening tool has been shown to decrease mortality associated with colorectal cancer (Chiu et al. 2015; Giorgi et al. 2015). The disadvantage of the test is its lower unsatisfactory sensitivity for detection of early stage cancers. To this end, the search for novel more accurate biomarkers continues (Chiu et al. 2013).
3 Chitinase 3-Like 1 (YKL-40) Protein in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer
Chitinase 3-like 1 (CHI3L1), also known as YKL-40 protein, is a human cartilage glycoprotein-39 (HC-gp-39) that was first described in 1992 as a protein secreted by the MG-63 human osteosarcoma cell line (Johansen et al. 1992). In addition to cancer cells, YKL-40 also is secreted by inflammatory and stem cells. In normal tissues, high YKL-40 expression has been noticed in embryos and fetuses where the processes of proliferation, differentiation, and tissue morphogenetic changes are highly active (Johansen et al. 2007). The blood content of YKL-40 in healthy adults is fairly stable, with the median of 43 μg/L as determined in a study by Johansen et al. (2008) and 40 μg/L in the Danish NORDIC VII study that included 3130 subjects (Tarpgaard et al. 2014), with increasing levels with age. An elevated plasma level of YKL-40 has reported in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, liver fibrosis, severe infections, as well as in patients with cancers inter alia breast, lung, prostate, colorectal, and gastric cancers (Schultz and Johansen 2010; Roslind and Johansen 2009). Such wide spectrum of different pathologies where YKL-40 increases indicates a lack of specificity. Therefore, comorbidities should be taken into account when assessing the diagnostic utility of YKL-40 investigated for a primary disease.
Kawada et al. (2012) have noticed significant differences in plasma content of YKL-40 between control subjects and patients with stage I/II and stage III/IV colorectal cancer. Those authors have also reported increased YKL-40 mRNA expression in cancer tissue when compared with normal adjacent tissues. Therefore, elevated YKL-40 content may be related to a more aggressive phenotype of cancer, having a high metastatic potential. Cintin et al. (2002) have reported that preoperative serum YKL-40 content rises above the age-corrected 95th percentile of healthy volunteers in 19% of patients with colorectal cancer. In a study by Johansen et al. (2015), YKL-40 is elevated in 20% of patients with colorectal cancer, 15% with rectal cancer, 11% with adenoma, 9% with other nonmalignant diseases of the digestive tract, and 8% with no pathological endoscopic findings. Likewise, Tarpgaard et al. (2014) have found that plasma YKL-40 is higher than the upper normal level in 40% of non-resectable metastatic colorectal cancer.
Postoperatively, YKL-40 may decrease in patients who have it within the normal range before surgery, and that may be a positive prognostic sign. The elevated level of YKL-40 appears to be an independent prognostic of short survival, based on a study including 603 patients who underwent a primary large bowel resection for colorectal cancer (Cintin et al. 1999). In another study, Cintin et al. (2002) have shown that patients who underwent curative tumor resection and had high serum YKL-40 6 months post-surgery were burdened with increased risk of death. In both studies, the YKL-40 content was independent of the serum CEA content. A comparison between YKL-40 and CEA contents performed by Ye et al. (2014) has revealed that YKL-40 is less accurate for diagnosing colorectal cancer, but better for diagnosing tumor recurrence. YKL-40 also appears of help in diagnosing the early-stage colorectal cancer and in monitoring recurrences when combined with CEA.
A high content of YKL-40 is an independent prognostic of poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma, although the prognostic value of the protein for survival has not been confirmed. It is also worth mentioning that tumor expression of YKL-40, assessed by immunohistochemistry, takes place in 62% of cases in (Senetta et al. 2015). In a study by Johansen et al. (2015), blood content of YKL-40 was higher in patients with colon and rectal cancer than in those with adenoma and other nonmalignant diseases. In patients with colorectal cancer, content of YKL-40 correlated with the stage of cancer, and it was lower in patients with a rectal tumor. Comorbidities are associated with an increase in YKL-40. Thus, the protein is thought to be a good prognostic of colorectal cancer in patients without comorbidities. Ye et al. (2014) have found higher levels of blood YKL-40 in patients with recurrent and metastatic colorectal cancer than in those with the primary diagnosis of colorectal cancer or shortly after surgery. Liu et al. (2014) have confirmed the presence of a link between shorter survival and a high blood YKL-40, but they failed to notice any relationship between progression-free survival and the type of chemotherapy regimen or the histologic type of tumor. In 510 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in the NORDIC VII study, high pretreatment plasma YKL-40 content is associated with shorter progression-free survival and with overall survival (Tarpgaard et al. 2014).
4 Mechanisms of Action of YKL-40
YKL-40 is produced by various types of restricted cells including colonic epithelial cells and macrophages. The content of this protein is elevated not only in colorectal cancer but also in other bowel diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn’s disease (Kamba et al. 2013; Koutroubakis et al. 2003; Vind et al. 2003). Chen et al. (2011) have reported that the expression of YKL-40 is significantly increased in colonic epithelial cells of non-dysplastic mucosa in patients with ulcerative colitis harboring neoplastic lesions when compared with patients without dysplasia and with healthy subjects. A greater expression of YKL-40 concerns more invasive and metastatic tumors. The YKL-40 also has a growth-stimulating effect akin to that of insulin-like growth factor-1, and it stimulates the migration of colonic epithelial cells. Additionally, YKL-40 stimulates the production of interleukin-8 (IL-8) and tumor necrosis factor-α by activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway in a human colon cancer cell line (SW480 cells). Other studies confirmed the presence of NF-κB in inflamed intestinal mucosa and a strong association between increased NF-κB activity and colorectal carcinogenesis in the animal model (Popivanova et al. 2008; Rogler et al. 1998). Elevated YKL-40 in epithelial cells may not only suggest inflammation-associated malignant transformation but may also control intestinal inflammation and promote dysplasia in colonic cells (Chen et al. 2011). The findings of Kawada et al. (2012) have shown that overexpression of YKL-40 leads to increased chemotaxis of macrophages and to angiogenesis associated with increased release of IL-8 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) from SW480 cells. Studies in vitro have shown that angiogenic activity of YKL-40 is independent of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The effects of YKL-40 on endothelial cell activation may be blocked by silencing S1 expression in the cells or by an anti-YKL-40 antibody (Shao et al. 2009).
5 Nestin in Colorectal Cancer
Nestin is a class VI intermediate filament protein whose expression is upregulated in many kinds of tumor and some other tissues in both experimental models and human samples (Matsuda et al. 2013; Ishiwata et al. 2011). The protein is expressed mainly in neuroepithelial stem cells and is often present in tissues that undergo a repair process. Increased expression of nestin indicates immaturity (Ehrmann et al. 2005; Mokry et al. 2004). Nestin appears a useful marker of microvessel density (MVD) which is a prognostic factor in neoplastic malignancies, including colorectal cancer (Amoh et al. 2005). A significant correlation between MVD and liver metastases shows that tumors’ potential to grow, spread, and metastasize is related to the angiogenesis in and around cancer tissue (Choi et al. 1998; Tomisaki et al. 1996). MVD is an important prognostic factor, but the most essential information is provided by the number of newly formed blood vessels because they have leaky and weak basement membranes, which enables the entry of tumor cells into circulation and further spread. In contrast, it is much more difficult for malignant cells to penetrate the endothelial layer of a mature microvessel.
Many commonly used endothelial markers stain and identify both the newly formed small blood vessels and the already existing larger blood vessels. Teranishi et al. (2007), using an animal model, have shown that the CD34-labeled pattern of colorectal cancer blood vessels differs from that of the nestin-labeled pattern. CD34 is detected in the endothelial cells of larger blood vessels with a median diameter of 9.67 μm, whereas nestin is in smaller microvessels of the median diameter of 9.06 μm. In human colorectal cancer tissue, there are significant differences in the median diameter of blood microvessels, ranging from 8.82 to 6.30 μm. Stronger expression of nestin than CD34 also is found in the infiltrating border of a tumor. Further, MVD determined by nestin labeling appears a better prognostic factor for survival than MVD determined by CD34.
Reports on the connection between increased nestin expression and clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer are scarce. Tajima et al. (2014) have demonstrated a patient with an aggressive, undifferentiated carcinoma of the descending colon where there was an overexpression of several proteins including nestin, which prognosticated a poor prognosis. The patient experienced a recurrence 39 days after surgery and died 2 months later. Using clinical samples of colorectal cancer, Li et al. (2015) have shown that nestin is associated with tumorigenesis as its expression is higher in cancer tissue than in normal tissues. These authors further show nestin labeling in the endothelium of small-sized tumor vessels and in stromal cancer cells. Additional in vitro tests show that a knockdown of nestin arrested the cell cycle at S phase and inhibited the proliferation and migration of colorectal cancer cells. Such findings demonstrate that nestin can be used not only as a prognostic marker, but that it also gives hope for the development of a new therapeutic option for cancer patients.
6 Testin Protein in Colorectal Cancer
The testin protein is encoded by a gene which is located at human chromosome 7q31 within the common fragile chromosomal region FRA7G. This locus is susceptible to cancer-associated chromosomal aberrations which may play a role in the oncogenic process (Tatarelli et al. 2000). The protein is a component of cell-cell connections and focal adhesions. It can interact with other types of focal adhesion proteins and connect the actin cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix. There structures, along with integrin receptors, play a role in cell motility, spreading, proliferation, and apoptosis (Coutts et al. 2003). The protein is produced in normal human tissues, but not in tumor tissues, such as breast, prostate, liver, ovarian cancer, in utero glioblastoma, and others (Hu et al. 2015; Yongbin et al. 2014; Chene et al. 2004). Downregulation of testin can be due to a loss of heterozygosity of the testin gene or by hypermethylation of its promoter. Clinically, a reduced level of testin protein is found in 89% of patients with glioblastoma. Additionally, downregulation of testin associates with a worse outcome and a shorter survival time. It seems a biological plausibility that enhancing testin expression could attenuate the malignant character of cancer cells (Fu et al. 2015. Bai et al. 2014).
In colorectal cancer, Li et al. (2015) have noticed a significantly lower level of testin mRNA and protein expression when compared with adjacent tumor-free tissue samples. Those authors have also found an adverse association between the histological grade, but not TNM stage, of colorectal cancer and the level of testin. Studies in vitro have shown that both testin mRNA and protein expression are remarkably reduced in nine colorectal cancer cell lines, but not in the two kinds of normal human colon cells. Further, in vitro overexpression of testin reduces the colony formation efficiency, inhibits cell growth, and increases mRNA and protein expression of pro-apoptotic proteins, whereas the opposite is present when testin is knocked down. The suppressive effect of testin on colorectal cancer cells has also demonstrated in the murine model.
7 Conclusions
The role of biomarker proteins such as YKL-40, nestin, and TES in carcinogenesis is not yet full elucidated. The proteins are associated with cancer aggressiveness and prognosis. A combined assessment of several biomarkers may improve diagnosis and may better prognosticate recurrence and survival. There is a need for further studies to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of colorectal cancer.
References
Amoh Y, Yang M, Li L, Reynoso J, Bouvet M, Moossa AR, Katsouka K, Hoffman RM (2005) Nestin–linked green fluorescent protein transgenic nude mouse for imaging human tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Res 65:5352–5357
Bai Y, Zhang QG, Wang XH (2014) Downregulation of TES by hypermethylation in glioblastoma reduces cell apoptosis and predicts poor clinical outcome. Eur J Med Res 19:66
Botteri E, Iodice S, Bagnardi V, Raimondi S, Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P (2008) Smoking and colorectal cancer: a meta–analysis. JAMA 300:2765–2778
Chen CC, Pekow J, Llado V, Kanneganti M, Lau CW, Mizoguchi A, Mino–Kenudson M, Bissonnette M, Mizoguchi E (2011) Chitinase 3–like–1 expression in colonic epithelial cells as a potentially novel marker for colitis–associated neoplasia. Am J Pathol 179:1494–1503
Chene L, Giroud C, Desgrandchamps F, Boccon–Gibod L, Coussenot O, Berthon P, Latil A (2004) Extensive analysis of the 7q31 region in human prostate tumors supports TES as the best candidate tumor suppressor gene. Int J Cancer 111:798–804
Chiu HM, Lee YC, Tu CH, Chen CC, Tseng PH, Liang JT, Shun CT, Lin JT, Wu MS (2013) Association between early stage colon neoplasms and false–negative results from the fecal immunochemical test. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:832–838
Chiu HM, Chen SL, Yen AM, Chiu SY, Fann JC, Lee YC, Pan SL, Wu MS, Liao CS, Chen HH, Koong SL, Chiou ST (2015) Effectiveness of fecal immunochemical testing in reducing colorectal cancer mortality from the One Million Taiwanese Screening Program. Cancer 121:3221–3229
Choi HJ, Hyun MS, Jung GJ, Kim SS, Hong SH (1998) Tumor angiogenesis as a prognostic predictor in colorectal carcinoma with special reference to mode of metastasis and recurrence. Oncology 55:575–581
Cintin C, Johansen JS, Christensen IJ, Price PA, Sorensen S, Nielsen HJ (1999) Serum YKL–40 and colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 79:1494–1499
Cintin C, Johansen JS, Christensen IJ, Price PA, Sorensen S, Nielsen HJ (2002) High serum YKL–40 level after surgery for colorectal carcinoma is related to short survival. Cancer 95:267–274
Corbo C, Cevenini A, Salvatore F (2017) Biomarker discovery by proteomics–based approaches for early detection and personalized medicine in colorectal cancer. Proteomics Clin Appl 11:1600072
Coutts AS, MacKenzie E, Griffith E, Black DM (2003) TES is a novel focal adhesion protein with a role in cell spreading. J Cell Sci 116:897–906
Das V, Kalita J, Pal M (2016) Predictive and prognostic biomarkers in colorectal cancer: a systematic review of recent advances and challenges. Biomed Pharmacother 87:8–19
Doleman B, Mills KT, Lim S, Zelhart MD, Gagliardi G (2016) Body mass index and colorectal cancer prognosis: a systematic review and meta–analysis. Tech Coloproctol 20:517–535
Duffy MJ (2001) Carcinoembryonic antigen as a marker for colorectal cancer: is it clinically useful? Clin Chem 47:624–630
Duke CE (1932) The classification of cancer of the rectum. J Pathol Bacteriol 35:323
Ehrmann J, Kolar Z, Mokry J (2005) Nestin as a diagnostic and prognostic marker: immunohistochemical analysis of its expression in different tumours. J Clin Pathol 58:222–223
Ferrari P, Jenab M, Norat T, Moskal A, Slimani N, Olsen A, Tjonneland A et al (2007) Lifetime and baseline alcohol intake and risk of colon and rectal cancers in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC). Int J Cancer 121:2065–2072
Friedenreich CM, Neilson HK, Farris MS, Courneya KS (2016) Physical activity and cancer outcomes: a precision medicine approach. Clin Cancer Res 22:4766–4775
Fu J, Luo B, Guo WW, Zhang QM, Shi L, Hu QP, Chen F, Xiao SW, Xie XX (2015) Down–regulation of cancer/testis antigen OY–TES–1 attenuates malignant behaviors of hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 8:7786–7797
Fukuda I, Yamakado M, Kiyose H (1998) Influence of smoking on serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels in subjects who underwent multiphasic health testing and services. J Med Syst 22:89–93
GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators (2015) Global, regional, and national age–2013;sex specific all–cause and cause–specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 385:117–171
Giorgi RP, Vicentini M, Sacchettini C, Di Felice E, Caroli S, Ferrari F, Mangone L, Pezzarossi A, Roncaglia F, Campari C, Sassatelli R, Sacchero R, Sereni G, Paterlini L, Zappa M (2015) Impact of screening program on incidence of colorectal cancer: a cohort study in Italy. Am J Gastroenterol 110:1359–1366
Goldstein MJ, Mitchell EP (2005) Carcinoembryonic antigen in the staging and follow–up of patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Investig 23:338–351
González N, Prieto I, Del Puerto–Nevado L, Portal–Nuñez S, Ardura JA, Corton M, Fernández–Fernández B, Aguilera O, Gomez–Guerrero C, Mas S, Moreno JA, Ruiz–Ortega M, Sanz AB, Sanchez–Niño MD, Rojo F, Vivanco F, Esbrit P, Ayuso C, Alvarez–Llamas G, Egido J, García–Foncillas J, Ortiz A, Diabetes Cancer Connect Consortium (2017) 2017 update on the relationship between diabetes and colorectal cancer: epidemiology, potential molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Oncotarget 8:18456–18485
Goossens N, Nakagawa S, Sun X, Hoshida Y (2015) Cancer biomarker discovery and validation. Transl Cancer Res 4:256–269
Hasan M, Mohieldein A (2015) Association between serum carcinoembryonic antigen level and oxidative stress parameters among diabetic females. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:6489–6494
Holleczek B, Rossi S, Domenic A, Innos K, Minicozzi P, Francisci S, Hackl M, Eisemann N, Brenner H, EUROCARE–5 Working Group (2015) On–going improvement and persistent differences in the survival for patients with colon and rectum cancer across Europe 1999–2007 – results from the EUROCARE–5 study. Eur J Cancer 51:2158–2168
Hu Q, Fu J, Luo B, Huang M, Guo W, Lin Y, Xie X, Xiao S (2015) OY–TES–1 may regulate the malignant behavior of liver cancer via NANOG, CD9, CCND2 and CDCA3: a bioinformatic analysis combine with RNAi and oligonucleotide microarray. Oncol Rep 33:1965–1975
Ishiwata T, Matsuda Y, Naito Z (2011) Nestin in gastrointestinal and other cancers: effects on cells and tumor angiogenesis. World J Gastroenterol 17:409–418
Johansen JS, Williamson MK, Rice JS, Price PA (1992) Identification of proteins secreted by human osteoblastic cells in culture. J Bone Miner Res 7:501–512
Johansen JS, Hoyer PE, Larsen LA, Price PA, Mollgard K (2007) YKL–40 protein expression in the early developing human musculoskeletal system. J Histochem Cytochem 55:1213–1228
Johansen JS, Lottenburger T, Nielsen HJ, Jensen JE, Svendsen MN, Kollerup G, Christensen IJ (2008) Diurnal, weekly, and long–time variation in serum concentrations of YKL–40 in healthy subjects. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 17:2603–2608
Johansen JS, Christensen IJ, Jorgensen LN, Olsen J, Rahr HB, Nielsen KT, Leurberg S, Brünner N, Nielsen HJ (2015) Serum YKL–40 in risk assessment for colorectal cancer: a prospective study of 4,496 subjects at risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 24:621–626
Johnson IT (2017) The cancer risk related to meat and meat products. Br Med Bull 121:73–81
Kamba A, Lee IA, Mizoguchi E (2013) Potential association between TLR4 and chitinase 3–like 1 (CHI3L1/YKL–40) signaling on colonic epithelial cells in inflammatory bowel disease and colitis–associated cancer. Curr Mol Med 13:1110–1121
Kawada M, Seno H, Kanda K, Nakanishi Y, Akitake R, Komekado H, Kawada K, Sakai Y, Mizoguchi E, Chiba T (2012) Chitinase 3–like 1 promotes macrophage recruitment and angiogenesis in colorectal cancer. Oncogene 31:3111–3123
Koutroubakis IE, Petinaki E, Dimoulios P, Vardas E, Roussomoustakaki M, Maniatis AN, Kouroumalis EA (2003) Increased serum levels of YKL–40 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Color Dis 18:254–259
Lee JK, Liles EG, Bent S, Levin TR, Corley DA (2014) Accuracy of fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta–analysis. Ann Intern Med 160:171
Li J, Wang R, Yang L, Wu Q, Wang Q, Nie Z, Yu Y, Ma J, Pan Q (2015) Knockdown of Nestin inhibits proliferation and migration of colorectal cancer cells. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 8:6377–6386
Liu X, Zhang Y, Zhu Z, Ha M, Wang Y (2014) Elevated pretreatment serum concentration of YKL–40: an independent prognostic biomarker for poor survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Med Oncol 31:85
Maringe C, Walters S, Rachet B, Butler J, Fields T, Finan P, Maxwell R, Nedrebø B, Påhlman L, Sjövall A, Spigelman A, Engholm G, Gavin A, Gjerstorff ML, Hatcher J, Johannesen TB, Morris E, McGahan CE, Tracey E, Turner D, Richards MA, Coleman MP, ICBP Module 1 Working Group (2013) Stage at diagnosis and colorectal cancer survival in six high–income countries: a population–based study of patients diagnosed during 2000–2007. Acta Oncol 52:919–932
Matsuda Y, Hagio M, Ishiwata T (2013) Nestin: a novel angiogenesis marker and possible target for tumor angiogenesis. World J Gastroenterol 19:42–48
Mokry J, Cizkova D, Filip S, Ehrmann J, Osterreicher J, Kolar Z, English D (2004) Nestin expression by newly formed human blood vessels. Stem Cells Dev 13:658–664
Popivanova BK, Kitamura K, Wu Y, Kondo T, Kagaya T, Kaneko S, Oshima M, Fujii C, Mukaida N (2008) Blocking TNF–alpha in mice reduces colorectal carcinogenesis associated with chronic colitis. J Clin Invest 118:560–570
Rogler G, Brand K, Vogl D, Page S, Hofmeister R, Andus T, Knuechel R, Baeuerle PA, Schölmerich J, Gross V (1998) Nuclear factor kappaB is activated in macrophages and epithelial cells of inflamed intestinal mucosa. Gastroenterology 115:357–369
Roslind A, Johansen JS (2009) YKL–40: a novel marker shared by chronic inflammation and oncogenic transformation. Methods Mol Biol 511:159–184
Schultz NA, Johansen JS (2010) YKL–40–a protein in the field of translational medicine: a role as a biomarker in cancer patients? Cancers (Basel) 2:1453–1491
Senetta R, Duregon E, Sonetto C, Spadi R, Mistrangelo M, Racca P, Chiusa L, Munoz FH, Ricardi U, Arezzo A, Cassenti A, Castellano I, Papotti M, Morino M, Risio M, Cassoni P (2015) YKL–40/c–Met expression in rectal cancer biopsies predicts tumor regression following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a multi–institutional study. PLoS One 10:e0123759
Shao R, Hamel K, Petersen L, Cao QJ, Arenas RB, Bigelow C, Bentley B, Yan W (2009) YKL–40, a secreted glycoprotein, promotes tumor angiogenesis. Oncogene 28:4456–4468
Tajima S, Waki M, Tsuchiya T, Hoshi S (2014) Granulocyte colony–stimulating factor–producing undifferentiated carcinoma of the colon mimicking a pulmonary giant cell carcinoma: a case showing overexpression of CD44 along with highly proliferating nestin–positive tumor vessels. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 7:7034–7041
Tanaka T, Tanaka M, Tanaka T, Ishigamori R (2010) Biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Int J Mol Sci 11:3209–3225
Tarpgaard LS, Guren TK, Glimelius B, Christensen IJ, Pfeiffer P, Kure EH, Sorbye H, Ikdahl T, Yilmaz M, Johansen JS, Tveit KM (2014) Plasma YKL–40 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first line oxaliplatin–based regimen with or without cetuximab: RESULTS from the NORDIC VII Study. PLoS One 9:e87746
Tatarelli C, Linnenbach A, Mimori K, Croce CM (2000) Characterization of the human TESTIN gene localized in the FRA7G region at 7q31.2. Genomics 68:1–12
Teranishi N, Naito Z, Ishiwata T, Tanaka N, Furukawa K, Seya T, Shinji S, Tajiri T (2007) Identification of neovasculature using nestin in colorectal cancer. Int J Oncol 30:593–560
Tomisaki S, Ohno S, Ichiyoshi Y, Kuwano H, Maehara Y, Sugimachi K (1996) Microvessel quantification and its possible relation with liver metastasis in colorectal cancer. Cancer 77(8 Suppl):1722–1728
Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet–Tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65:87–108
Vind I, Johansen JS, Price PA, Munkholm P (2003) Serum YKL–40, a potential new marker of disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 38:599–605
Ye HM, Lu YZ, Liang XM, Lin YZ, Li Y, Zhang ZY, Tzeng CM (2014) Clinical significance of combined testing of YKL–40 with CEA in Chinese colorectal cancer patients. Clin Lab 60:397–405
Yongbin Y, Jinghua L, Zhanxue Z, Aimin Z, Youchao Y, Yanhong S, Manjing J (2014) TES was epigenetically silenced and suppressed the epithelial–mesenchymal transition in breast cancer. Tumour Biol 35:11381–11389
Acknowledgments
Funded by Wroclaw Medical University grant no. ST.E020.17.050.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this article.
Ethical Approval
This review article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Szymańska-Chabowska, A., Juzwiszyn, J., Jankowska-Polańska, B., Tański, W., Chabowski, M. (2020). Chitinase 3-Like 1, Nestin, and Testin Proteins as Novel Biomarkers of Potential Clinical Use in Colorectal Cancer: A Review. In: Pokorski, M. (eds) Health and Medicine. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology(), vol 1279. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2020_506
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2020_506
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51120-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51121-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)