Abstract
It has always been a motivation for qualitative reasoning in general and qualitative spatial reasoning in particular that the ways of representing and reasoning about knowledge in these fields are considered to be similar to the ways of human cognition. In many cases, however, this purely relies on the researchers intuition rather than on actual empirical data. As Cohn [26,p.22] wrote in his overview article on qualitative spatial reasoning, “An issue which has not been much addressed yet in the QSR literature is the issue of cognitive validity — claims are often made that qualitative reasoning is akin to human reasoning, but with little or no empirical justification.” This is particularly true for the topological calculi described in Chapter 4 which are studied throughout this work. Although Randell et al. [138] and Egenhofer [44] identified the same set of eight topological relations using completely different approaches, and there thus seems to be a natural agreement about what is a reasonable level of granularity of topological relations, there is no indication so far that these relations are also interesting from a cognitive point of view.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2002). Cognitive Properties of Topological Spatial Relations. In: Renz, J. (eds) Qualitative Spatial Reasoning with Topological Information. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2293. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-70736-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-70736-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43346-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70736-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive