Abstract
Task scheduling is known to be NP-complete in its general form as well as in many restricted cases. Thus to find a near optimal solution in, at most, polynomial time different heuristics were proposed. The basic Grahamś task graph model [1] was extended to other list-based priority schedulers [2] where increased levels of communication overhead were included [3]. Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) have been used in the past to implement the allocation of the components (tasks) of a parallel program to processors [4], [5]. In this paper five evolutionary algorithms are compared. All of them use the conventional Single Crossover Per Couple (SCPC) approach but they differ in what is represented by the chromosome: processor dispatching priorities, tasks priority lists, or both priority policies described in a bipartite chromosome. Chromosome structure, genetic operators, experiments and results are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Graham R. L.: Bounds on Multiprocessing Anomalies and Packing Algorithms. Proceedings of the AFIPS 1972 Spring Joint Computer Conference, pp 205–217, 1972.
Adam T.L., Chandy K.M., and Dickson J.R., A comparison of list schedules for parallel processing systems. Communications of the ACM, 17:685–9, 1974.
Kruatrachue B., Static task scheduling and grain paccking in parallel processing systems. PhD Thesis, Oregon State University, 1987.
Zomaya A., Genetic scheduling for parallel processor systems: Comparative studies and performance issues. IEEE Trans. Parallel and Distributed Systems. Vol. 10, No. 8, 1999.
Kidwell M.:Using Genetic Algorithms to Schedule Tasks on a Bus-based System. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp 368–374, 1993.
Cena M., Crespo M., Gallard R.,: Transparent Remote Execution in LAHNOS by Means of a Neural Network Device. ACM Press, Operating Systems Review, Vol. 29, Nr. 1, pp 17–28, 1995.
Ercal F.: Heuristic Approaches to Task Allocation for Parallel Computing. Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio State University, 1988.
Flower J., Otto S., Salama M.: Optimal mapping of irregular finite element domains to parallel processors. Caltech C3P#292b, 1987.
Al_Mouhamed M. and Al_Maasarani A., Performance evaluation of scheduling precedence-constrained on message-passing systems. IEEE Trans. Parallel and Distributed Systems. 5(12):1317–1322, 1994.
Bagchi S., Uckum S., Miyabe Y., Kawamura K.: Exploring Problem Specific Recombination Operators for Job Shop Scheduling. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp 10–17, 1991.
Pinedo M.,: Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms and Systems. Prentice Hall International Series in Industrial and Systems Engineering, 1995.
Esquivel S., Gatica C., Gallard R.: Conventional and Multirecombinative Evolutionary Algorithms for the Parallel Task Scheduling Problem, LNCS 2037: “Applications of Evolutionary Computing”, pp. 223–232, Springer, April 2001.
Bierwirth C., Mattfeld D., Kopfer H: On Permutation representations for Scheduling Problems, PPSN IV, Springer-Verlag. pp310–318, 1996.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Esquivel, S., Gatica, C., Gallard, R. (2002). Performance of Evolutionary Approaches for Parallel Task Scheduling under Different Representations. In: Cagnoni, S., Gottlieb, J., Hart, E., Middendorf, M., Raidl, G.R. (eds) Applications of Evolutionary Computing. EvoWorkshops 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2279. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46004-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46004-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43432-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46004-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive