Abstract
The epistemology that can be found in structural computing holds promise as a foundation for digital visual art. The fields of literature and art criticism and reception and communication theory have parallels with structural computing’s call for structure as a first class object. The concept of authoring structure can then be applied to the field of visual art. Using foundations taken from literary theory and theater montage, a theoretical scenario is proposed for constructing an authoring tool that can access and in.uence a changing, dynamic structure ofa multimedia work of visual art. The “holes” ofa multimedia presentation - its changing structure - can be added to the domain ofthe author.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aarseth, Espen J. “Nonlinearity and Literary Theory.” In Landow, George P. (ed.): “Hyper/Text/Theory.” The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1994, pp. 51–86.
Abbott, Edwin A.: “Flatland.” Dover Publications, New York, 1952.
Barthes, Roland. “The Rhetoric ofthe Image.” In “Image, Music, Text.” Hill and Wang, New York, 1982, pp. 32–51.
Barthes, Roland. “The Third Meaning.” In “Image, Music, Text.” Hill and Wang, New York, 1982, pp. 52–68.
Bateson, Gregory. “The Logical Categories ofLearning and Communication.” In “Steps to an Ecology ofMind.” Ballantine Books, New York 1972, pp. 279–308.
Darbyshire, A.E. “A Grammar ofSt yle.” Andre Deutsch Limited, London, 1971.
Fried, Michael. “Art and Objecthood”. In Battcock, Gregory (ed.), “Minimal Art: A Critical Anthology.” E.P. Dutton & Co., New York, 1968, pp. 116–147.
Gold, Rich. http://www.parc.xerox.com/red/members/richgold/PAIRTALK/ HTML/slide4.html.
Grigely, Joseph. “Textualterity: Art, Theory, and Textual Criticism.” The University ofMic higan Press, Ann Arbor, 1995.
Iser, Wolfgang. “The Act of Reading.” Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1980. Ch. 1, pp. 3–19.
Johnson, Steven. “Interface Culture.” Harper Edge, San Francisco, 1997, chapter 1.
Kitzmann, Andreas. “Paradigms ofthe Digital.” Source unknown; printed in compendium “Elektronik Kultur II”, MMA, Aarhus University, autumn 2000; reference to previously published version in “Convergence: the journal of Research in New Media Technologies.” Autumn 1998.
Napier, A. David. “Foreign Bodies: Performance, Art, and Symbolic Anthropology.” University ofCalifornia Press, Berkeley, 1992.
Ruffini, Franco. “Horizontal and Vertical Montage in the Theatre.” article 4 from NTQ, vol. II, no. 5, 1986.
Salton, Gerard; Allan, James; Buckley, Chris; Singhal, Amit. “Automatic Analysis, Theme Generation, and Summarization ofMac hine-Readable Texts.” In Card, Stuart; Mackinlay, Jock; Shneiderman, Ben. “Readings in Information Visualization”, Morgan Kaufmann Inc., San Francisco, 1999, pp. 413–418.
Whorf, Benjamin Lee. “Languages and Logic.” In “Language, Thought & Reality”, The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1962, pp. 233–245.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shapiro, S. (2002). Writing the Holes; “Structural” Reflections of a Visual Artist. In: Reich, S., Tzagarakis, M.M., De Bra, P.M.E. (eds) Hypermedia: Openness, Structural Awareness, and Adaptivity. AH 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2266. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45844-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45844-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43293-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45844-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive