Skip to main content

A Compilation of Updates plus Preferences

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2424))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We show how to compile programs formalizing update plus preference reasoning into standard generalized logic programs and show the correctness of the transformation.

This work was partially supported by POCTI project 40958 “FLUX - FleXible Logical Updates”. The second author acknowledges a Research Grant by the Stiftelsen Lars Hiertas Minne.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. J. Alferes, P. Dell’Acqua, and L. M. Pereira. A compilation of updates plus preferences. Technical report, LiTH-ITN-R-2002-7, Dept. of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Sweden, 2002. Available at: http://www.itn.liu.se/english/research/.

  2. J. J. Alferes, J. A. Leite, L. M. Pereira, H. Przymusinska, and T. C. Przymusinski. Dynamic updates of non-monotonic knowledge bases. The J. of Logic Programming, 45(1–3):43–70, 2000.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. J. J. Alferes and L. M. Pereira. Updates plus preferences. In M. O. Aciego, I. P. de Guzman, G. Brewka, and L. M. Pereira (eds.) Logics in AI, Procs. JELIA’00, LNAI 1919, pp. 345–360, Berlin, 2000. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. J. Alferes and L. M. Pereira. Logic Programming Updating-a guided approach-Essays in honour of Robert Kowalski. In A. Kakas and F. Sadri (eds.) Computational Logic: From Logic Programming into the Future. Springer, 2002. To appear. Available at: http://centria.di.fct.unl.pt/~lmp/.

  5. G. Brewka. Well-founded semantics for extended logic programs with dynamic preferences. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 4, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Brewka and T. Eiter. Preferred answer sets for extended logic programs. Artificial Intelligence, 109, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Brewka and T. Eiter. Preferred answer sets for extended logic programs. Artificial Intelligence, 109:297–356, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Cui and T. Swift. Preference logic grammars: Fixed-point semantics and application to data standardization. Artificial Intelligence, 2002. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Delgrande, T. Schaub, and H. Tompits. A compilation of Brewka and Eiter’s approach to prioritization. In M. O. Aciego, I. P. de Guzman, G. Brewka, and L. M. Pereira (eds.), Logics in AI, Procs. JELIA’00, LNAI 1919, pp. 376–390, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Gelfond and V. Lifschitz. The stable model semantics for logic programming. In R. A. Kowalski and K. Bowen (eds.) Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Logic Programming, pp. 1070–1080, 1988. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Grosof. Courteous logic programs: Prioritized conflict handling for rules. Research Report RC 20836, IBM, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Inoue and C. Sakama. Negation as failure in the head. Journal of Logic Programming, 35:39–78, 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. V. Lifschitz and T. Woo. Answer sets in general non-monotonic reasoning (preliminary report). In B. Nebel, C. Rich, and W. Swartout (eds.) KR’92. Morgan-Kaufmann, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Prakken. Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law, volume 32 of Law and Philosophy Library. Kluwer academic publishers, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Alferes, J.J., Dell’Acqua, P., Pereira, L.M. (2002). A Compilation of Updates plus Preferences. In: Flesca, S., Greco, S., Ianni, G., Leone, N. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2424. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45757-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45757-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44190-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45757-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics