Abstract
This paper investigates the methodological foundations of a new research field called chance discovery, which aims to detect future opportunities and risks. By drawing on concepts from cybernetics and system theory, it is argued that chance discovery best applies to open systems that are equipped with regulatory and anticipatory mechanisms. Non-determinism, freedom (entropy) and open systems property are motivated as basic assumptions underlying chance discovery. The prediction-explanation asymmetry and evaluation of chance discovery models are discussed a fundamental problems of this field.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashby, W. R. (1964) An Introduction to Cybernetics. London.
Botkin, J. W.; Elmandjra, M.; and Malitza, M. (1998) No Limits To Learning. Bridging The Human Gap. A Report to the Club of Rome. Pergamon Press.
Deutsch, D. (1985): Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle and the universal quantum computer. In Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 97–117.
Fayyad, U.; Piatetsky-Shapiro, G.; and Smyth, P. (1996): Knowledge discovery and data mining: Towards a unifying framework. In Proceedings 2nd InternationalConference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-96).
Feynman, R. (1982) Simulating physics with computers. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21:467–488.
McBurney, P.; Parsons, S. (2001): Chance discovery using dialectical argumentation. In Y. Ohsawa (ed.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Chance Discovery, 37–45.
Ogawa, S. (2000): Building of trust evaluation model based on the failure prediction. In Y. Ohsawa (ed.), Workshop on Chance Discovery and Management. In conjunction with KES’2000, Brighton, UK.
Ohsawa, Y.; Benson, N. E.; and Yachida, M. (1998): KeyGraph: automatic indexing by co-occurrence graph based on building construction metaphor. In Proceedings Advanced DigitalLibr ary Conference (IEEE ADL-98), 12–18.
Ohsawa, Y., ed. (2000) Workshop on Chance Discovery and Management. In conjunction with the Forth International Conference on Knowledge-based Intelligent Engineering Systems and Allied Technologies (KES’2000). Brighton, UK: IEEE, Inc.
Popper, K. (1963) Conjectures and Refutations. Routledge and Keagan Paul. London.
Schurz, G. (1995): Scientific explanation: A critical survey. Foundations of Science 3:429–465.
Schurz, G. (1999): Normic laws as system laws: Foundations of nonmonotonic reasoning. In Proceedings 4th Dutch-German Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning Techniques and Their Applications (DGNMR-99).
Spector, L.; Barnum, H.; Bernstein, H. J.; and Swamy, N. (1999): Quantum computation and AI. In Proceedings 16th NationalConfer ence on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-99). Invited Talk.
Stolze, M; Ströbel, M. (2001): Utility-based decision tree optimization: A framework for adaptive interviewing. In Proceedings 8th InternationalConference on User Modeling (UM-01), 105–116.
Suppes, P. (2000) Freedom and uncertainty. In Natke, H., and Ben-Haim, Y., eds., Uncertainty: Models and Measures, Mathematical Reasearch. Academie Verlag. 69–83.
v. Bertalanffy, L. (1979) General System Theory. New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Prendinger, H., Ishizuka, M. (2001). Methodological Considerations on Chance Discovery. In: Terano, T., Ohsawa, Y., Nishida, T., Namatame, A., Tsumoto, S., Washio, T. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2253. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45548-5_58
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45548-5_58
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43070-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45548-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive