Skip to main content

Evaluating the Usability of the Scale Metaphor for Querying Semantic Spaces

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2205))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Information visualizations have become popular tools for extracting knowledge from large bodies of information. Very little is known on the usability of such ‘visual knowledge tools’ for information access. The goal of this paper is to show the usability of the spatial metaphor ‘scale’ to access a large semantic document space. An experiment was conducted to examine whether different user groups can associate graphical changes in resolution in spatialized views with changes of level of detail in an index hierarchy of a digital document collection. Test participants were asked to utilize zoom tools to explore a spatialized subset of the GeoRef database, an extensive collection of geology and earth sciences documents. The outcomes of the experiment suggest that people are able to associate graphical changes in resolution of spatialized views (zooms) with changes in levels of detail of a document collection (hierarchical order). These results are independent of user group membership, but for some displays it takes people longer to make a decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., and Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in Information Visualization. Using Vision to Think, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catarci, T. (2000). What’s New in Visual Query Systems? Proceedings, First International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Savannah, GA, Oct. 28–31, 2000. (http://www.giscience.org/GIScience2000/invited/Catarci.pdf)

  • Chen, C., Czerwinski, M., (Eds.) (2000). Special Issue on Empirical Evaluation of Information Visualisations. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 53(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Czerwinski, M., and Macredie R. (Eds.) (2000). Special Issue on Individual Differences in Virtual Environments. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 51(6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. and Yue, Y. (2000). Empirical Studies of Information Visualization: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53: 851–866.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., and Derman, D. (1976). Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests. Princeton, NJ, Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabrikant, S. I. and Buttenfield, B. P. (2001). Formalizing Semantic Spaces For Information Access. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91: 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrikant, S. I. (2000). Spatial Metaphors for Browsing Large Data Archives. Unpublished Disseration, University of Colorado-Boulder, Department of Geography, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freundschuh, S. M. and Egenhofer, M. J. (1997). Human Conceptions of Spaces: Implications for GIS. Transactions in GIS, 2: 361–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R. G. (1995). Primitives of Spatial Knowledge. In Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction for Geographic Information Systems, Nyerges, T. L., Mark, D. M., Laurini, R., and Egenhofer, M. J. (eds.), Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic: 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, B. A. (1997). GeoRef Thesaurus. Alexandria, VA, American Geological Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D. and Burke, P. J. (1980). Log-Linear Models. Sage University Paper Number 20. Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraak, M. J. (1988). Computer-Assited Cartographical Three-Dimensional Imaging Techniques. Dissertation. Delft, The Netherlands, Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, And Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About The Mind. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. (1991). Inner and Outer Theory in HCI. In Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interaction Interface, Carroll, J. M. (ed.), Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press: 154–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, T. P., Hardy, J. K., and Hirtle, S. C. (1989). Subjective Hierarchies in Spatial Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15: 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montello, D. R., Golledge, R. G. (1999). Scale and Detail in the Cognition of Geographic Information. Varenius Project Report, Specialist Meeting, May 14–16, 1998, Santa Barbara, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, E., Lewis, M., and Olsen, K. A. (2000). Evaluating Visualizations: Using a Taxonomic Guide. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 53: 637–662.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. Boston, MA, Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1993). Things That Make Us Smart. Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirolli, P., Card, S. K., and Van Der Wege, M. M. (2000). Visual Information Foraging in a Focus + Context Visualization. Xerox PARC, Technical Report, IR-R-2000-14. URL: http://www.parc.xerox.com/istl/projects/uir/pubs/pdf/UIRR-2000-14-Pirolli-TechReport-VIFinFocusContext.pdf (Jan. 2001).

  • Robertson, G. (1998). Keynote Address: Leveraging Human Capabilities in Information Perceptualizationd. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis’ 98), Oct. 19–20, 1998, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. URL: http://www.research.microsoft.com/~ggr/infovis98.ppt (Jan. 2001).

  • Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stasko, J., Catrambone, R., Guzdial, M., and McDonald, K. (2000). An Evaluation of Space-Filling Information Visualizations for Depicting Hierarchical Structures. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53: 663–694.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fabrikant, S.I. (2001). Evaluating the Usability of the Scale Metaphor for Querying Semantic Spaces. In: Montello, D.R. (eds) Spatial Information Theory. COSIT 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2205. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45424-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45424-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42613-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45424-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics