Abstract
In “Demonstratives” Kaplan claims that the occurrence of a demonstrative must be supplemented by an act of demonstration, like a pointing (a feature of the objective context). Conversely in “Afterthoughts” Kaplan argues that the occurrence of a demonstrative must be supplemented by a directing intention (a feature of the intentional context). I present the two theories in competition and try to identify the constraints an intention must satisfy in order to have semantic relevance. My claim is that the analysis of demonstrative reference provides a reliable test for our intuitions on the relation between objective and intentional context. I argue that the speaker’s intentions can play a semantic role only if they satisfy an Availability Constraint: an intention must be made available or communicated to the addressee, and for that purpose the speaker can exploit any feature of the objective context. This thesis implies the reconciliation between “Demonstratives” and “Afterthoughts”.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almog, J., Perry, J. and Wettstein, H. (eds.): Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989)
Bach, K.: Communicative Intentions, Plan Recognition, and Pragmatics: Comments on Thomason and on Litman and Allen. In Cohen Ph. et al. (eds.): Intentions in Communication. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge (MA) (1990) 389–400
Bach, K.: Paving the road to reference. Philosophical Studies 67 (1992) 295–300
Bach, K.: Intentions and Demonstrations. Analysis 52 (1992) 140–146
Bach, K. and Harnish, R. M.: Linguistic Communications and Speech Acts. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge (MA) (1979)
Bach, K. and Harnish, R. M.: How Performatives Really Work: A Reply to Searle. Linguistics and Philosophy 15 (1992) 93–110
Bianchi, C.: Tree Forms of Contextual Dependence. In P. Bouquet et al. (eds.): Modeling and Using Context, Second International and Interdisciplinary Conference, Context’99, Proceedings. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York (1999) 67–76
Bianchi, C.: La dipendenza contestuale. Per una teoria pragmatica del significato. Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, Napoli (2001)
Bianchi, C.: Context of Utterance and Intended Context. In V. Akman et al. (eds): Modeling and Using Context. Third International and Interdisciplinary Conference, Context’ 01. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York (2001) 73–86
Clark, H.: Arenas of Language Use. The University of Chicago Press & CSLI (1992)
Donnellan, K.: Putting Humpty Dumpty Together Again. The Philosophical Review 77 (1968) 203–215
Garcia-Carpintero, M.: Indexicals as Token-Reflexives. Mind 107 (1998) 529–563.
Gauker, Ch.: Domain of Discourse. Mind 106 (1997) 1–32
Gauker, Ch.: What is a context of utterance? Philosophical Studies 91 (1998) 149–172
Hale, B. and Wright, C. (eds.): A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Blackwell, Oxford (1997)
Kaplan, D.: Demonstratives. An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals. In Perry, J. and Wettstein, H. (eds.): Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989) [1] 481–563
Kaplan, D.: Dthat. In P. French, T. Uehling and H. Wettstein (eds.): Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language (1979) 383–400
Kaplan, D.: Afterthoughts. In Perry, J. and Wettstein, H. (eds.): Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989) [1] 565–614
Lewis, D.: General Semantics. Synthese 22 (1970) 18–67
Montague, R.: Pragmatics. In Montague, R.: Formal Semantics. Yale University Press, New Haven (1974) 95–118
Penco, C.: Objective and Cognitive Context. In P. Bouquet et al. (eds.): Modeling and Using Context, Second International and Interdisciplinary Conference, Context’99, Proceedings. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York (1999) 270–283
Penco, C.: Context and Contract. In P. Bouquet and L. Serafini (eds.): Perspectives on Context. CSLI, Stanford (2003) forthcoming
Perry, J.: Indexicals and Demonstratives. In Wright, C. (eds.): A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Blackwell, Oxford (1997) [15] 586–612
Perry, J.: Indexicals, Contexts and Unarticulated Constituents. Proceedings of the 1995 CSLI-Amsterdam Logic, Language and Computation Conference. CSLI Publications, Stanford (1998) 1–16
Reimer, M.: Demonstratives, Demonstrations, and Demonstrata. Philosophical Studies 67 (1991) 187–202
Reimer, M.: Do Demonstratives Have Semantic Significance? Analysis 51 (1991) 177–183
Reimer, M.: Demonstrating with Descriptions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (1992) 877–893
Roberts, L. D.: How Demonstrations Connect with Referential Intentions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (1997) 190–200
Sbisà, M.: Speech acts in context. Language and Communication (2003) forthcoming
Stalnaker, R.: Context and Content. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)
Travis, Ch.: Saying and Understanding. Blackwell, Oxford (1975)
Travis, Ch.: The True and the False: the Domain of Pragmatics. Benjamins, Amsterdam (1981)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bianchi, C. (2003). How to Refer: Objective Context vs. Intentional Context. In: Blackburn, P., Ghidini, C., Turner, R.M., Giunchiglia, F. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2680. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44958-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44958-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40380-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44958-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive