Skip to main content

COTS Evaluation Using Desmet Methodology & Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Product Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2559))

Abstract

Diversity on COTS selection is causing that certain companies spend large amount of time and effort evaluating those COTS for integration within their custom made systems. This evaluation is most of the times based on de-facto rules and techniques that unfortunately may lead the company in choosing the worse or not the best component for its system. This research gives an interpretation on how to evaluate COTS making use of two different methodologies for software selection and decision making respectively. The purpose is to present how the DESMET methodology along with the AHP methodology can be combined in such a way that COTS selection would be easier and more accurate than before. This new evaluation approach will make COTS selection less human dependable and more straight forward, providing with the mean for ranking the different alternatives in a numerical way so deciding becomes more empirical base and less human base.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barbara Ann Kitchenham: Evaluating Software Engineering Methods and Tool. National Computing Centre, Manchester, England

    Google Scholar 

  2. Michael A. Trick: Analytic Hierarchy Process. Carnegie Mellon University. Available online at: http://mat.gsia.cmu.edu/mstc/multiple/node4.html

  3. Yan Jianyuan: Using Analytic Hierarchy process as the auxiliary decision of computer integrated system for library management (CISLM). Nankai University, Tianjin, China. Available online at: http://web.simmons.edu/~chen/nit/NIT'92/387-yan.htm

  4. Les Frair: Student Peer Evaluations using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Method. University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, Department of Industrial Engineering. Available online at: http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie95/4c3/4c31/4c31.htm

  5. David Carney, Kurt Wallnau: COTS Evaluation. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Morera, D. (2002). COTS Evaluation Using Desmet Methodology & Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). In: Oivo, M., Komi-Sirviö, S. (eds) Product Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2559. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36209-6_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36209-6_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00234-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36209-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics