Summary
The near-polar CHAMP and GRACE satellites are now acquiring vitally important new information on the geoid and gravity field of the polar regions. This investigation demonstrates that CHAMP and GRACE data are dramatically reducing the large gaps in our knowledge of the Arctic region, constraining the long wavelength geopotential (>300 km) and beginning to yield the high accuracy marine geoid which is needed for Arctic oceanographic and sea ice studies. Using a detailed Arctic surface gravity field and an independent altimetric gravity field as benchmarks we have evaluated the intermediate-to-long wavelength (> 300km) component of seven CHAMP and two GRACE satellite-only gravity models such as the GFZ EIGEN, the NASA PGS and UT/CSR. We evaluate, spectrally, the errors in - and differences between - these satellite-only models in the Arctic at wavelengths from 300 to 2500 km. The GRACE models accurately resolve Arctic gravity to full wavelengths as short as 500 km while the CHAMP models do so to full wavelengths as short as 1000 km. However the CHAMP models continue to show improved resolution as more and better (e.g. lower elevation) data are incorporated. The best CHAMP models agree well with the detailed Arctic ARC-GP model to an rms (error of commission) of better than 2.06 mGal (gravity)and 31 cm (geoid) for all wavelengths (full) longer than 1100 km. GRACE-only geoids are precise to 40 cm or better (all wavelengths) over large areas of the Arctic. CHAMP and GRACE-based geoids could have the accuracy required to detect (together with altimetry) the poorly known dynamic topography of the Arctic Ocean. As an example, a GRACE/detailedgravity hybrid geoid is presented.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biancale R, Balmino G, Lemoine, J-M, Marty J-C, Moynot B, Barlier F, Exertier P, Laurain O, Gegout P, Schwintzer P, Reigber Ch, Bode A, König R, Massmann F-H, Raimondo J-C, Schmidt R, Zhu SY (2000) A New global Earth's Gravity Field Model from Satellite Orbit Perturbations: GRIM5-S1. Geophys Res Lett 27: 3611–3614.
Childers V, McAdoo DC, Brozena, J, Laxon, S (2001) New gravity data in the Arctic Ocean: Comparison of airborne and ERS gravity. J Geophys Res 105(B5).
Farrell SL, Laxon SW, McAdoo DC (2003) Sea Ice Thickness Determination Using Laser Altimetry. Arctic Climate System Study (ACSYS), Final Science Conference "Progress in Understanding the Arctic Climate System”, submitted.
Forsberg R and Kenyon SC and Arctic Gravity Project (ARC-GP) working group under the International Gravity and Geoid Commission, International Association of Geodesy (2002) See http://earth-info.nima.mil/GandG/agp/ and Eos Trans. AGU 80(46), Fall Meeting Suppl., Abstract F992, 1999.
Gerlach C, Foldvary L, Svehla D, Gruber Th, Wermuth M, Sneeuw N, Frommknecht, B, Oberndorfer H, Peters Th, Rummel R (2003) A CHAMP-only gravity field from kinematic orbits using the energy integral. Geophys Res Lett 30(20): 2037.
Han S-C, Shum CK, Jekeli C, Braun A, Chen Y, Kuo C (2004) CHAMP Gravity Field Solutions and Geophysical Constraint Studies. This issue.
Howe E, Stenseng L, Tscherning CC (2003) CHAMP Gravity Field Model UCPH2003. Geophys. Res. Abstracts (EGS/AGU) v. 5, 09582, also http://www.gfy.ku.dk/~eva/ en/sagrada.php
Laxon SW and McAdoo DC (1994) Arctic Ocean gravity field derived from ERS-1 satellite altimetry. Science 265: 621–624.
Laxon SW and DC McAdoo (1998) Satellites provide new insights into polar geophysics. EOS Trans. AGU 79(6), 69: 72–73.
Lemoine FG, Kenyon SC, Factor JK, Trimmer RG, Pavlis NK, Chinn DS, Cox CM, Klosko SM, Luthcke SB, Torrence MH, Wang, YM, Williamson RG, Pavlis EC, Rapp RH, Olson TR (1998) The development of the joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) geopotential model EGM96. NASA Technical Paper NASA/TP-1998-206861, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt.
Maslowski W, Newton B, Schlosser P, Semtner AJ and Martinson DG (2000) Modeling Recent Climate Variability in the Arctic Ocean. Geophys Res Lett 27(22): 3743–3746.
Peacock NR and Laxon SW (2003) Sea surface height determination in the Arctic Ocean from ERS altimetry. J Geophys Res, in press.
Reigber Ch, Schmidt R, Flechtner F, König R, Meyer U, Neumayer KH, Schwintzer P, Zhu SY (2003a) First EIGEN Gravity Field Model based on GRACE Mission Data Only. (in preparation for Geophys Res Lett).
Reigber Ch, Schwintzer P, Stubenvoll R, König R, Neumayer H, Förste Ch, Barthelmes F, Balmino G, Biancale R, Lemoine J-M, Loyer S, Bruinsma S, Perosanz F, Fayard T (2003b) CHAMP Global Gravity Field Recovery — Status in Satellite-Only and Combined Mean Field Solution. IUGG 2003 (abstract).
Reigber Ch, Schwintzer P, Neumayer K-H, Barthelmes F, König R, Förste Ch, Balmino G, Biancale R, Lemoine J-M, Loyer S, Bruinsma S, Perosanz F, Fayard T (2003c) The CHAMP-only Earth Gravity Field Model EIGEN-2. Adv Space Res 31(8): 1883–1888 (doi: 10.1016/S0273—1177(03)00162-5).
Tapley B et al. (2003) The GRACE Gravity Model 01 (GGM01) released on July 21, 2003. This model was based upon a preliminary analysis of 111 days of in-flight data gathered during the commissioning phase of the GRACE mission (2003) see http://www.csr.utexas.edu/grace/gravity/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McAdoo, D., Wagner, C., Laxon, S. (2005). Improvements in Arctic Gravity and Geoid from CHAMP and GRACE: An Evaluation. In: Reigber, C., Lühr, H., Schwintzer, P., Wickert, J. (eds) Earth Observation with CHAMP. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26800-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26800-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22804-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-26800-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)