Skip to main content

Flux-vector splitting for the Euler equations

  • Contributed Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Eighth International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 170))

Abstract

For the full or isenthalpic Euler equations combined with the ideal-gas law, the flux-vector splitting presented here is, by a great margin, the simplest means to implement upwind differencing. For a polytropic gas law, with γ > 1, closed formulas have not yet been derived.

The scheme produces steady shock profiles with two interior zones. There is evidence [10] that, among implicit versions of upwind methods, those with a two-zone steady-shock representation give faster convergence to a steady solution than those with a one-zone representation.

A disadvantage in using any flux-vector splitting is that it leads to numerical diffusion of a contact discontinuity at rest. This diffusion can be removed; present research is aimed at achieving this with minimal computational effort.

Numerical solutions by first- and second-order schemes including the above split fluxes can be found in Refs. [6], [7] (one-dimensional) and [8], r91 (two-dimensional).

Research was supported under NASA Contract No. NAS1-15810 while the author was in residence at ICASE, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23665.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P.L. Roe, J. Computational Phys. 43 (1981), 357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Osher, “Numerical solution of singular perturbation problems and hyperbolic systems of conservation laws”, North-Holland Mathematical Studies 47 (1981), 179.T

    Google Scholar 

  3. R.H. Sanders and K.H. Prendergast, Astrophys. J. 188 (1974), 489.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.L. Steger and R.F. Warming, J. Computational Phys. 40 (1981), 263.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Harten, P.D. Lax and B. van Leer, “Upstream differencing and Godunov-type schemes”, ICASE Report No. 82-5; to appear in SIAM Review.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.L. Steger, “A preliminary study of relaxation methods for the inviscid conservative gasdynamics equations using flux-vector splitting”, Report No. 80-4, August 1980, Flow Simulations, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G.D. van Albada, B. van Leer and W.W. Roberts, Jr., “A comparative study of computational methods in cosmic gas dynamics”, Astron. Astrophys. 108 (1982), 76.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G.D. van Albada and W.W. Roberts, Jr., Ap. J. 246 (1981), 740.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M.D. Salas, “Recent developments in transonic flow over a circular cylinder”, NASA Technical Memorandum 83282 (April 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P.M. Goorjian and R. van Buskirk, “Implicit calculations of transonic flow using monotone methods”, AIAA Paper 81-331 (198,1).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

E. Krause

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

van Leer, B. (1982). Flux-vector splitting for the Euler equations. In: Krause, E. (eds) Eighth International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 170. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-11948-5_66

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-11948-5_66

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-11948-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39532-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics