Abstract
This article analyses and discusses whether there is an association between environmental performance and corporate environmental reporting in the paper and electricity industries in Germany and the United Kingdom and what the influence of environmental management accounting is on this link. After discussing environmental performance measurement and environmental reporting in general, the chapter introduces a measurement framework for both as the basis of an empirical study. Subsequently, the major empirical findings from a cross-sectional survey of corporate environmental reports and environmental statements as well as environmental performance indicators for air and water emissions in the above industries and countries are reported. These findings suggest that consistency between environmental performance and environmental reporting (operationalised empirically in terms of statistical correlation) is relatively rare, although (as is argued in the article) future credibility of companies will most likely depend on it. The findings also reveal that environmental performance tend to be linked to country location whereas quality of corporate environmental reports tend to be associated to sector membership. The chapter attempts an explanation of this, relating the findings to differences in environmental legislation in both countries. It concludes with implications for the use of environmental reports by third parties as well as a number of recommendations, especially concerning the need for more standardised indicators and reporting procedures.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Environmental Performance
- Electricity Sector
- Environmental Report
- Corporate Environmental Performance
- Sulphur Dioxide Emission
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Bennett, M. and James, P. (1997), Environment-Related Performance Measurement: Current Practice and Trends. Ashridge: Ashridge Management College.
Bennett, M. and James, P. (1998), Environment under the Spotlight — Current Practice and Future Trends in Environment-Related Performance Measurement for Business. London: Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA).
Brophy, M. and Starkey, R. (1996), Environmental Reporting. In: Welford, R. (ed.) Corporate Environmental Management — Systems and Strategies. London: Earthscan, pp. 150–176.
Cable, J. (1984), Employee Participation and Firm Performance: A Prisoners’Dilemma Framework (EUI Working Paper 84/126) Florence: European University Institute.
CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (1993), EU Regulation (EEC) No 1836/93 of 29 June 1993 Allowing Voluntary Participation By Companies in the Industrial Sector in a Community Eco-Management and Audit Scheme. Bruxelles: CEC.
CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (2001), Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No. 761/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 Allowing Voluntary Participation by Organisations in a Community Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS). Official Journal of the European Communities L114 24 April 2001.
Ditz D. and Ranganathan J. (1997), Measuring Up. Towards a Common Framework for Tracking Corporate Environmental Performance. Washington DC: World Resources Institute (WRI).
Endres, A. (1994), Umweltökonomie (Environmental Economics). Tübingen: Verlag Cansier (available only in German).
EPA (1995), Introduction to Environmental Accounting. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) (2002), Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Boston: GRI.
Gordon, J. (1994), Environmental Policy in Britain and Germany: Some Comparisons. European Environment 4(3): 9–12.
Grafe-Buckens, A. (1998), Environmental Statements: Meeting the User’s Needs. Paper presented at the International Institute of Industrial Environmental Economics (IIIEE) Invitational Seminar “Continuity, Credibility and Comparability” 13–16 June Eze, France.
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1998), Multivariate data analysis with readings (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Handler, T. (1997), Environmental Regulation in England and Wales. In: Handler, T (ed.) Regulating the European Environment (2nd ed.). Chichester & New York: John Wiley, pp. 55–73.
Hillary, R. (2000), ISO 14001 Case Studies and Practical Experiences. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
Hitchens, D., Birnie, J., McGowan, A., Triebswetter, U. and Cottica, A. (1998), The Firm, Competitiveness and Environmental Regulation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Hitchens, D., Triebswetter, U., Birnie, J., Thompson, W., Bertossi, P. and Bessori, L. (2000), Environmental Regulation and Competitive Advantage — A Study of Packaging Waste in the European Supply Chain. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
IRRC (Investor Responsibility Research Centre) (1995), Environmental Reporting and Third Party Statements. Washington, DC: IRRC and Global Environmental Management Institute (GEMI).
ISO (International Standards Organisation) (1996), International Standard ISO 14031 Environmental Management — Environmental Performance Evaluation. Geneva: ISO.
ISO (International Standards Organisation) (1999), ISO 14031. Environmental Management. Environmental Performance Evaluation — Guidelines. Geneva: ISO.
James, P., Prehn, M. and Steger, U. (1997), Corporate Environmental Management in Britain and Germany. London/Berlin: Anglo-German Foundation for the Study of Industrial Society.
Peattie, K. and Ringler, A. (1994), Management and the Environment in the United Kingdom and Germany: A Comparison. European Management Journal 12(2): 216–225.
Schaltegger, S. and Burritt, R. (2000), Contemporary Environmental Accounting. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
Schaltegger, S. and Sturm, A. (1992), Ökologieorientierte Entscheidungen in Unternehmen. Ökologisches Rechnungswesen statt Ökobilanzierung: Notwendigkeit, Kriterien, Konzepte (Environmentally Oriented Decisions in Companies. Environmental Accounting instead of Ecobalancing: Necessity, Criteria, Concepts) (1st ed.). Bern: Haupt (available only in German).
Schaltegger, S. and Synnestvedt, T. (2002), The Link between “Green” and Economic Success: Environmental Management as the Crucial Trigger between Environmental and Economic Performance. Journal of Environmental Management 65: 339–346.
Scherer, J. (1997), Environmental Regulation in the Federal Republic of Germany. In: Handler, T. (ed.) Regulating the European Environment (2nd ed.). Chichester & New York: John Wiley, pp. 89–112.
Skillius, A. and Wennberg, U. (1998), Continuity, Credibility and Comparability: Key Challenges for Corporate Environmental Performance Measurement and Communication. Lund/Sweden: International Institute of Industrial Environmental Economics (IIIEE)/Lund University.
Tyteca, D. (1996), On the Measurement of the Environmental Performance of Firms — A Literature Review and a Productive Efficiency Perspective. Journal of Environmental Management 46: 281–308.
Tyteca, D., Carlens, J., Berkhout, F., Hertin, J., Wehrmeyer, W. and Wagner, M. (2002), Corporate Environmental Performance Evaluation: Evidence from the MEPI Project. Business Strategy and the Environment 11: 1–13.
Wehrmeyer, W. and Tyteca, D. (1998), Measuring Environmental Performance for Industry: From Legitimacy to Sustainability? International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 5: 111–124.
Young, C.W. and Rikhardsson, P.M. (1996), Environmental Performance Indicators for Business. Eco-Management and Auditing 3: 113–125.
Young, W. and Welford, R. (1998), An Environmental Performance Management Framework for Business. Greener Management International 21: 30–49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wagner, M. (2005). Environmental Performance and the Quality of Corporate Environmental Reports: The Role of Environmental Management Accounting. In: Rikhardsson, P.M., Bennett, M., Bouma, J.J., Schaltegger, S. (eds) Implementing Environmental Management Accounting: Status and Challenges. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3373-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3373-7_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3371-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3373-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)