Abstract
The availability of sex-disaggregated data in the fields of research, technology and development is extremely important for supporting the growing political commitment to promote and monitor women participation in the different fields of S&T. During the late 1990s the European Commission identified as a priority the availability of this data. Even if scientific publications and patents are widely accepted indicators of scientific and technological performances, until now it has been impossible to measure bibliometric and patent output by gender in a large set of data. Starting from a feasibility study carried out for the European Commission on the whole set of patents published in 1998 by the European Patent Office and on 30,000 authors of items published in 1995 on scientific journals of international relevance, the paper demonstrates that it is possible to obtain robust gender indicators on S&T output.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Bibliometric Indicator
- European Patent Office
- Technological Performance
- Female Contribution
- International Patent Classification
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Bochow, M., Joas, H. (1987). Wissenschaft und Karriere, der berufliche Verbleib der akademischen Mittelbaus. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
Campanelli, G., Segnana, M.L., Soci, A. (1999).Attività didattica, visibilità e pubblicazioni dei giovani economisti italiani. Una prospettiva di genere. In Carabelli, A., Parisi, D., Rosselli, A., 1999, Che genere di economista? Bologna: Il Mulino.
Cole, J.R., Cole, S. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: University Chicago Press.
Di Cesare, R., Luzi, D., Valente, A. (2003). La produzione scientifica del Cnr nelle scienze sociali: considerazioni di genere. In A. Valente, D. Luzi (Eds.), Partecipare la scienza. Roma: Biblink (in press)
European Commission — Directorate-General for Research, Science and Society. (2003). She figures: women and science, statistics and indicators. EUR 20733.
European Commission — Directorate-General for Research, Knowledge-based economy and society competitiveness, economic analysis and indicators (2003). Third European Report on science and technology indicators, towards a knowledge based economy. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
Harding, S., Mc Gregor, E. (1996). The conceptual framework. In World Science Report (pp. 303–324). Paris: Unesco.
Kaplan, S.H., Sullivan, L.M., Dukes, K.A., Phillis, C.F., Kelch, R.P., Schaller, J.G. (1996). Sex differences in academic advancement, England Journal of Medicine, 335, 1282–1289.
Long, J.S. (Ed.). (2001). From Scarcity to Visibility: Gender Differences in the Careers of Doctoral Scientist and Engineers. Panel for the study of gender differences in career outcomes of science and engineering Ph.D.s. Washington: National Academy Press.
Long, J.S. (1992). Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces, 71 (1), 159–178.
Naldi, F., Vannini Parenti, I. (2002). Scientific and technological performance by gender — A feasibility study on patents and bibliometric indicators. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Osborn, et al. (2000). ETAN Report science policies in the European Union — promoting excellence through mainstreaming gender equality. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Palomba, R. (ed.) (2000). Figlie di Minerva. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Siltanen, J., et al. (1995). Gender inequicity in the labour market. Geneva: ILO.
Sonnert, G., Holton, G. (1996). Career pattern of women and men in sciences. American Scientist, 84, 67–71.
Verspagen, B., van Moergastel, T., Slabbers, M. (1994). MERIT concordance table: IPC — ISIC (rev.2). RM1994-004, http://www.merit.unimaas.nl/publications.
Xie, Y., Shauman, K.A. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity. New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, Official Journal of the American Sociological Association, 63, 847–870.
Zuckerman, H., Cole, J.R., Bruer, J.T. (Eds.). (1992). The outer circle, women in scientific community. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Naldi, F., Luzi, D., Valente, A., Vannini Parenti, I. (2004). Scientific and Technological Performance by Gender. In: Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U. (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2702-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2755-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)