This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Austin, J. R. (2000). Knowing what and whom other people know: Linking transactive memory with external connections in organizational groups. Best Paper Proceedings (CD). Briarcliff Manor: Academy of Management.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.
Blanning, R. W., & King, D. R. (1995). An overview of organizational intelligence. In R. W. Blanning & D. R. King (Eds.), Organizational intelligence (pp. 1–9). Los Alamos: IEEE Computer Society Press.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (1999). UCINET 5.0 Version 1.00. Natick: Analytic Technologies.
Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). On the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning by experts, intermediates and novices. Cognitive Science, 16, 164–184.
Brooking, A. (1999). Corporate memory: Strategies for knowledge management. London: International Thompson Business Press.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1999). The social life of information. Harvard: Business School Press.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social practice perspective. Organization Science, 12, 198–213.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Burt, R. S. (1999). Entrepreneurs, distrust, and third parties: A strategic look at the dark side of dense networks. In L. L. Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 213–243). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organisational Behavior, 22, 345–423.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.
Crampton, S. M., & Hodge, J. W. (1998). The informal communication network: Factors affecting grapevine activity. Public Personnel Management, 27, 569–585.
Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-life laboratories. In R. J. Stenberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365–395). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273–305.
Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1997). Issues of expert flexibility in contexts characterized by complexity and change. In P. J. Feltovich, K. M. Ford, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Expertise in context (pp. 125–146). Menlo Park: AAAI Press.
Frank, K., & Yasumoto, J. Y. (1998). Linking action to social structure within a system: Social capital within and between subgroups. American Journal of Sociology 104, 642–686.
Friedman, R. A., & Podolny, J. (1992). Differentiation of boundary spanning roles: Labor negotiations and implications for role conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly 37, 28–48.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82–102.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink. Psychological studies of policy decision. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity. Conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741–763.
Kameda, T., Otshubo, Y., & Takezawa, M. (1997). Centrality in sociocognitive networks and social influence: An illustration in a group decision-making process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 296–309.
Kameda, T., & Sugimori, S. (1993). Psychological entrapment in group decision making: An assigned decision rule and a groupthink phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 282–292.
Keister, L. A. (1999). Where do strong ties come from? A dyad analysis of the strength of interfirm exchange relations during China’s economic transition. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 7, 5–25.
Kitcher, P. (1990). The division of cognitive labor. The Journal of Philosophy, 87, 5–22.
Krackhard, D. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organisations. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 342–369.
Larson, A. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 76–104.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mason, R. M. (1995). Strategic information systems: Use of information technology in a learning organization. In R. W. Blanning & D. R. King (Eds.), Organizational intelligence. AI in organizational design, modeling, and control (pp. 218–227). Los Alamos: IEEE Computer Society Press.
Moreland, R. L. (1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In L. L Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M. Messic (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 3–31). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Nardi, B., Whittaker, S., & Schwarz, H. (2000). It’s not what you know, it’s who you know: Work in the information age. First Monday, 5, 5. URL: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_5/nardi/index.html
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rikers, R. M. J. P., Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2000). Knowledge encapsulation and the intermediate effect. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 150–160.
Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1993). On acquiring expertise in medicine. Educational Psychology Review 5, 205–221.
Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis. A handbook. London: Sage.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors of learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher 27(2), 4–13.
Shanteau J. (1992). How much information does an expert use? Is it relevant? Acta Psychologica, 81, 75–86.
Stein, E. W. (1997). A look at expertise from a social perspective. In P. J. Feltovich, K. M. Ford, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Expertise in context (pp.181–194). Menlo Park: AAAI Press.
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35–67.
Van de Wiel, M. W. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (2000). Knowledge restructuring in expertise development: Evidence from pathophysiological representations of clinical cases by students and physicians. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 12, 323–355.
Vartiainen, M., Hakonen, M., Simola, A., Kokko, N., & Rantamäki, T. (1999, July). Learning project model and transfer of experience. Paper presented at the 6th EIASM International Product Development Conference, Cambridge, UK.
Vicente, K. J., & Wang, J. H. (1998). An ecological theory of expertise effects in memory recall. Psychological Review, 105, 33–57.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis. Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wegner, D. M. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–248). London: Kogan Page.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wittenbaum, G. M., & Stasser, G. (1996). Management of information in small groups. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What’s social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 3–28). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Wong, S., & Sitkin, S. B. (2000). Shaping collective cognition and behavior through collective learning. Academy of Management Proceedings (MOC:B1). Location: Publisher.
Ylirenko, H. (1999). Dependence, social capital and learning in key customer relationships. Effects on performance of technology-based new firms. Espoo: Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Palonen, T., Hakkarainen, K., Talvitie, J., Lehtinen, E. (2004). Network Ties, Cognitive Centrality, and Team Interaction Within a Telecommunication Company. In: Boshuizen, H.P.A., Bromme, R., Gruber, H. (eds) Professional Learning: Gaps and Transitions on the Way from Novice to Expert. Innovation and Change in Professional Education, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2094-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2094-5_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2066-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2094-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive