Abstract
Ideas are no longer generated solely within a firm’s internal boundaries but also sourced from the external knowledge environment. Therefore, firms can no longer rely solely on internal knowledge to develop new ideas or solve problems. This paper is based on empirical research which investigates different knowledge acquisition strategies utilized by firms during the innovation process. It suggests that there is a relationship between the kind of innovative activity (cumulative or radical) and the sourcing of knowledge (i.e., the internal and/or external environment). Two hypotheses are derived from the literature and tested empirically. These hypotheses are based on the premise that cumulative type organizations focus primarily on internal knowledge or existing core competencies within the firm and are less likely to scan the external environment for ideas and knowledge, whereas radical type organizations are continually pushing out the boundaries of knowledge and replacing existing core competencies with new ideas and knowledge and are therefore predisposed toward utilizing external knowledge. The research findings confirm the hypotheses and enable the development of a third dimension based on a dual ability to focus on both cumulative and radical innovation aligned with the most appropriate knowledge acquisition strategy.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
Argote, L., and Ingram, P. “Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process (82:1), 2000, pp. 150–169.
Argote, L., Mc Evily, B., and Reagans, R. “Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Intergrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes,” Management Science (49:4), 2003, pp. 571–582.
Baden-Fuller, C, and Pitt, M. Strategic Innovation, London: Routledge, 1996.
Barney, J. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management (17:1), 1991, pp. 99–120.
Baum, J., and Ingram, P. “Survival-Enhancing Learning in the Manhattan Hotel Industry,” Management Science (36:7), 1998, pp. 140–154.
Bessant, J. Challenges in Innovation Management: The International Handbook on Innovation, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd., 2003a, pp. 761–774.
Bessant, J. High-Involvement Innovation: Building and Sustaining Competitive Advantage Through Continuous Change, New York: Wiley, 2003b.
Chesbrough, H. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003.
Christensen, C. M. The Innovators Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
Cockburn, I. M., and Henderson, R. M. “Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery,” Journal of Industrial Economics (46:2), 1998, pp. 157–182.
Cohen, W. M., and Levinthal, D. A. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly (35:1), 1990, pp. 128–152.
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., and Walsh, J. P. “Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D,” Management Science (48:1), 1990, pp. 1–23.
Cooper, R. “Doing it Right: Winning at New Products” Ivey Business Journal (64:6), 2000, pp. 54–60.
Darr, E, Argote, D., and Epple, D. “The Acquisition, Transfer and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises,” Management Science (41:11), 1995, pp. 1750–1762.
Darroch, J. “Knowledge Management, Innovation and Firm Performance,” Journal of Knowledge Management (9:3), 2005, pp. 101–115
Dosi, G. “Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories,” Research Policy (11), 1982, pp. 147–162.
Etzkowitz, H. “Networks of Innovation: Science, Technology and Development in the Triple Helix Era,” International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development (1:1), 2002, pp. 7–20.
Fahy, J. “The Resource-Based View of the Firm: Some Stumbling-Blocks on the Road to Understanding Sustainable Competitive Advantage,” Journal of European Industrial Training (24:2–4), 2000, pp. 94–104.
Garcia, R., and Calantone, R. “A Critical Look at Technological Innovation Typology and Innovativeness Terminology: A Literature Review,” The Journal of Product Innovation Management (19:2), 2002, pp. 112–132.
Grant, R. “The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formation,” California Management Review (33:3), 1991, pp. 114–35.
Hamel, G. Leading the Revolution, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000.
Hamel, G. “Strategy as Revolution,” Harvard Business Review (74:4), July–August 1996, pp. 69–82.
Herstatt, C, and von Hippel, E. “From Experience: Developing New Product Concepts Via the Lead User Method: A Case Study in a ‘Low Tech’ Field,” Journal of Product Innovation Management (9), 1992, pp. 213–221.
Kaplan, S. M. “Discontinuous Innovation and the Growth Paradox,” Strategy and Leadership, March/April 1999, pp. 16–21.
Kogut, B., and Zander, U. “What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity and Learning,” Organization Science (7:5), 1996, pp. 502–519.
Kusunoki, K. “Incapability of Technological Capability: a Case Study on Product Innovation in the Japanese Facsimile Machine Industry,” Journal of Product Innovation Management (14:5), 1997, pp. 368–382.
Leifer R., MdDermott, C. M., O’Connor, G. C, Peters, L. S., Rice, M. P., and Veryzer, R. W. Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000.
March, J. G. “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning,” Organization Science (2:1), 1991, pp. 71–87.
Menon, T., and Pfeffer, J. “Valuing Internal Versus External Knowledge,” Management Science (49:4), 2003, pp. 497–513.
O’Connor, G., and Ayers, A. D. “Building a Radical Innovation Competency,” Journal of Research and Technology Management (48:1), 1005, pp. 309–334.
O’Reilly, C, and Tushman, M. “The Ambidextrous Organization,” Harvard Business Review (82:4), 2004, pp. 74–81.
Prahalad, C, and Hamel, G. “The Core Competencies of the Corporation,” Harvard Business Review, May/June 1994, pp. 79–91.
Slappendel, C. “Perspectives on Innovation in Organizations,” Organizational Studies (17:1), 1997, pp. 107–129.
Stalk, G., Evans, P., and Shulan, L. “Competing on Capabilities: The New Rules of Corporate Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, March/April, 1992, pp. 57–69.
Teece D. J “Strategies for Managing Knowledge Assets: The Role of Firm Structure and Industrial Context,” Long Range Planning (33:1), 2000, pp. 35–54.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management,” Strategic Management Journal (18:7), 1997, pp. 509–533.
Vidgen, R. “Adaptive Information Systems Development,” in Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.6 Working Conference on IT Innovation for Adaptability and Competitiveness, Leixlip, Ireland, May 31–June 2, 2004, pp. 1–16.
von Hippel, E. The Sources of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.
Yin, R. K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (rev. ed.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1989.
Zott, C. “Dynamic Capabilities and the Emergence of Intra-industry Differential Firm Performance: Insights from a Simulation Study,” Strategic Management Journal (24:2), 2003, pp. 97–125.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Deverell, A., Lassen, A.H. (2006). The challenge of Managing Knowledge in Innovative Organizations: Internal Versus External Knowledge Acquisition. In: Donnellan, B., Larsen, T.J., Levine, L., DeGross, J.I. (eds) The Transfer and Diffusion of Information Technology for Organizational Resilience. TDIT 2006. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 206. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34410-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34410-1_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-34409-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-34410-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)